Progress in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Water Vapor Emissions and Respiratory Inorganics

Decis. Sci. Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.3390/sci3030033
A. Andrae
{"title":"Progress in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Water Vapor Emissions and Respiratory Inorganics","authors":"A. Andrae","doi":"10.3390/sci3030033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life cycle assessment (LCA) is being included formally in EcoDesign regulations. Especially product carbon footprint will be mandatory in Europe. However, life cycle impact assessment, including global warming potential (GWP) in LCA, is hampered by several challenges. One of these is a lack of water vapor characterization indexes for GWP. A life cycle inventory profile for air transport fuel, including water vapor emissions, is evaluated with state-of-the-art practice, i.e., Environmental Footprint (EF) Method and International Life Cycle Data (ILCD) 2011 Mid-point+, neglecting water vapor’s high altitude GWP compared to carbon dioxide. Then, the characterization factor in GWP over 100 years (GWP100) for water vapor and alternate normalization for particulates are introduced. The results are compared. The main findings are that the previous EF method and ILCD both generate rather realistic results for Particulate Matter and Respiratory Inorganics mid-point indicators, respectively, but the number of premature deaths should be better allocated to different specific emissions, and that water vapor may dominate the GWP100 result over the usual carbon dioxide. Respiratory inorganics may need one impact category, each starting with particles smaller than 2.5 µm. LCIA mid-points need measurable and understandable bases. The common knowledge of water vapor’s GWP100 should not be neglected in LCIA for air transport and beyond where relevant.","PeriodicalId":10987,"journal":{"name":"Decis. Sci.","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sci3030033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is being included formally in EcoDesign regulations. Especially product carbon footprint will be mandatory in Europe. However, life cycle impact assessment, including global warming potential (GWP) in LCA, is hampered by several challenges. One of these is a lack of water vapor characterization indexes for GWP. A life cycle inventory profile for air transport fuel, including water vapor emissions, is evaluated with state-of-the-art practice, i.e., Environmental Footprint (EF) Method and International Life Cycle Data (ILCD) 2011 Mid-point+, neglecting water vapor’s high altitude GWP compared to carbon dioxide. Then, the characterization factor in GWP over 100 years (GWP100) for water vapor and alternate normalization for particulates are introduced. The results are compared. The main findings are that the previous EF method and ILCD both generate rather realistic results for Particulate Matter and Respiratory Inorganics mid-point indicators, respectively, but the number of premature deaths should be better allocated to different specific emissions, and that water vapor may dominate the GWP100 result over the usual carbon dioxide. Respiratory inorganics may need one impact category, each starting with particles smaller than 2.5 µm. LCIA mid-points need measurable and understandable bases. The common knowledge of water vapor’s GWP100 should not be neglected in LCIA for air transport and beyond where relevant.
生命周期影响评估研究进展:水蒸气排放和呼吸性无机物
生命周期评估(LCA)已正式纳入生态设计法规。特别是产品的碳足迹将在欧洲强制执行。然而,生命周期影响评估,包括LCA的全球变暖潜势(GWP),受到一些挑战的阻碍。其中之一是缺乏GWP的水汽表征指标。航空运输燃料的生命周期清单概况,包括水蒸气排放,采用最先进的实践进行评估,即环境足迹(EF)方法和国际生命周期数据(ILCD) 2011中点+,忽略了与二氧化碳相比,水蒸气的高海拔GWP。然后,介绍了100年全球变暖潜能值(GWP100)中水汽的表征因子和颗粒物的交替归一化。对结果进行了比较。主要发现是,先前的EF方法和ILCD分别对颗粒物和呼吸性无机物中点指标产生了相当现实的结果,但过早死亡的数量应该更好地分配给不同的特定排放,并且水蒸气可能比通常的二氧化碳主导GWP100的结果。呼吸性无机物可能需要一个影响类别,每个类别的颗粒小于2.5µm。LCIA中点需要可测量和可理解的基础。在航空运输的LCIA中,水蒸气GWP100的常识不应被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信