Dropout at university level in Serbia: Analysis of measurement, research findings, services and prevention measures

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ivana Stepanović-Ilić, O. Tošković, Ksenija Krstić, Marina Videnović
{"title":"Dropout at university level in Serbia: Analysis of measurement, research findings, services and prevention measures","authors":"Ivana Stepanović-Ilić, O. Tošković, Ksenija Krstić, Marina Videnović","doi":"10.2298/ZIPI2002479S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dropout in higher education attracts great attention due to serious effects on an individual and on society. This is an exploratory study aimed at: analysing drop?out measurement and tracking in the Serbian higher education, reviewing studies on dropout causes, and identifying available services and prevention measures. Various techniques are used to achieve these goals (statistics analysis, literature review, qualitative content analysis). Our results show that: 1. There are no accepted dropout definitions nor official statistics, but some rate estimate could be given; 2. Research is not systematic, but covers three major dropout factors (individual, socio-demographic, studying conditions); 3. Services are sporadic and not visible enough; 4. Legislation reveals state interest in promoting higher education, but implemented measures are not adequate enough. We see establishment of the Unified Education Information System as an important step in precise dropout measurement. There is a need for flexible studying routes and increased financial support orientated more towards vulnerable student groups. International studies highlight the importance of intensification of teacher-student and peer interaction built in modern student-centred teaching practice. At the end, we advocate creating a new educational policy by combining two major frameworks in this field and relying on inclusive research.","PeriodicalId":42259,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2002479S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dropout in higher education attracts great attention due to serious effects on an individual and on society. This is an exploratory study aimed at: analysing drop?out measurement and tracking in the Serbian higher education, reviewing studies on dropout causes, and identifying available services and prevention measures. Various techniques are used to achieve these goals (statistics analysis, literature review, qualitative content analysis). Our results show that: 1. There are no accepted dropout definitions nor official statistics, but some rate estimate could be given; 2. Research is not systematic, but covers three major dropout factors (individual, socio-demographic, studying conditions); 3. Services are sporadic and not visible enough; 4. Legislation reveals state interest in promoting higher education, but implemented measures are not adequate enough. We see establishment of the Unified Education Information System as an important step in precise dropout measurement. There is a need for flexible studying routes and increased financial support orientated more towards vulnerable student groups. International studies highlight the importance of intensification of teacher-student and peer interaction built in modern student-centred teaching practice. At the end, we advocate creating a new educational policy by combining two major frameworks in this field and relying on inclusive research.
塞尔维亚大学辍学率:测量、研究成果、服务和预防措施的分析
高等教育中的辍学生由于其对个人和社会的严重影响而引起了人们的广泛关注。这是一项探索性研究,旨在分析drop?在塞尔维亚高等教育中衡量和跟踪辍学率,审查关于辍学原因的研究,并确定现有的服务和预防措施。为了实现这些目标,使用了各种技术(统计分析、文献回顾、定性内容分析)。我们的研究结果表明:1。没有公认的辍学定义,也没有官方统计数据,但可以给出一些比率估计;2. 研究不是系统的,但涵盖了三个主要的辍学因素(个人、社会人口、学习条件);3.服务是零星的,而且不够明显;4. 立法显示了国家对促进高等教育的兴趣,但实施措施还不够。我们认为建立统一的教育信息系统是精确测量辍学的重要一步。有必要为弱势学生群体提供灵活的学习路线和更多的财政支持。国际研究强调了在现代以学生为中心的教学实践中加强师生互动和同伴互动的重要性。最后,我们主张结合这一领域的两大框架,以包容性研究为依托,创造一种新的教育政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信