Brewery Effluent Treatment with Conventional and Natural Coagulants

Ramesh Babu Aremanda, Filmon Berhane, Heaven Daniel, A. Mehari, Arsiema Tekle
{"title":"Brewery Effluent Treatment with Conventional and Natural Coagulants","authors":"Ramesh Babu Aremanda, Filmon Berhane, Heaven Daniel, A. Mehari, Arsiema Tekle","doi":"10.20961/equilibrium.v6i2.66528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In water scarce countries such as Eritrea, maintaining brewery industry remain ever challenging task. Currently, Asmara breweries is the only beer producing factory consuming 8.46 L of water per every L of beer produced which is notably higher than Brewer’s Association (BA) benchmark and consequently generates 7.53 L of wastewater/L of beer. Bottle cleaning and brewery activities ascertain ample effluent bases. Wastewater from bottle cleaning (BCWW), brewery (BWW) and mixed (MWW) have attributed a wide spectrum of 3500-160000 mg/L of COD and 327-26667 mg/L of BOD5, which are significantly overtops other reported brewery effluents. Physicochemical treatments including coagulation with conventional (alum) and natural (MO seed) flocculants have tested to remove higher COD and BOD5 concentrations of brewery effluents. Optimal coagulant dosage determined by accounting turbidity as a key performance indicator. Alum treatment of BCWW and MO seed flocculation of MWW have resulted in lower turbidity levels of 0.49 and 6.17 NTU at 60 mg/L of dosages respectively. The optimal quantities of 92.2 % and 86.6% (by weight) of water recovered from alum treatment of BCWW and MO seed coagulation of MWW respectively. Higher sludge volumes recorded as a major disadvantage in alum coagulation whereas natural coagulant, MO seed manifested competitive results in removal of COD, BOD5, Chlorine, Nitrogen, Sulphate, Sodium, TDS and TSS along with PH stabilization. In addition, 97.2% of influent turbidity removed through MO seed coagulation treatment, an equipollent to alum despite of four fold increment in potassium levels.","PeriodicalId":11866,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/equilibrium.v6i2.66528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In water scarce countries such as Eritrea, maintaining brewery industry remain ever challenging task. Currently, Asmara breweries is the only beer producing factory consuming 8.46 L of water per every L of beer produced which is notably higher than Brewer’s Association (BA) benchmark and consequently generates 7.53 L of wastewater/L of beer. Bottle cleaning and brewery activities ascertain ample effluent bases. Wastewater from bottle cleaning (BCWW), brewery (BWW) and mixed (MWW) have attributed a wide spectrum of 3500-160000 mg/L of COD and 327-26667 mg/L of BOD5, which are significantly overtops other reported brewery effluents. Physicochemical treatments including coagulation with conventional (alum) and natural (MO seed) flocculants have tested to remove higher COD and BOD5 concentrations of brewery effluents. Optimal coagulant dosage determined by accounting turbidity as a key performance indicator. Alum treatment of BCWW and MO seed flocculation of MWW have resulted in lower turbidity levels of 0.49 and 6.17 NTU at 60 mg/L of dosages respectively. The optimal quantities of 92.2 % and 86.6% (by weight) of water recovered from alum treatment of BCWW and MO seed coagulation of MWW respectively. Higher sludge volumes recorded as a major disadvantage in alum coagulation whereas natural coagulant, MO seed manifested competitive results in removal of COD, BOD5, Chlorine, Nitrogen, Sulphate, Sodium, TDS and TSS along with PH stabilization. In addition, 97.2% of influent turbidity removed through MO seed coagulation treatment, an equipollent to alum despite of four fold increment in potassium levels.
用常规混凝剂和天然混凝剂处理啤酒废水
在像厄立特里亚这样缺水的国家,维持酿酒厂仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。目前,阿斯马拉啤酒厂是唯一一家啤酒生产工厂,每生产1升啤酒消耗8.46升水,这明显高于英国啤酒协会(BA)的基准,因此每生产1升啤酒产生7.53升废水。瓶子清洗和啤酒厂活动确定了充足的排放基地。洗瓶废水(BCWW)、啤酒厂废水(BWW)和混合酒厂废水(MWW)的COD含量为3500-160000 mg/L, BOD5含量为327-26667 mg/L,明显高于其他报道的啤酒厂废水。物理化学处理,包括用常规(明矾)和天然(MO种子)絮凝剂进行混凝,已经过测试,可去除高浓度的COD和BOD5。混凝剂的最佳投加量以浊度为关键性能指标。明矾处理和MWW的MO种子絮凝在60mg /L投加量下的浊度分别为0.49和6.17 NTU。明矾处理的最佳水回收率为92.2%,MWW的最佳水回收率为86.6%(重量比)。污泥体积较大是明矾混凝的主要缺点,而天然混凝剂MO种子在去除COD、BOD5、氯、氮、硫酸盐、钠、TDS和TSS以及PH稳定方面表现出竞争优势。此外,通过MO种子混凝处理,97.2%的进水浑浊度被去除,相当于明矾,尽管钾水平增加了四倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信