In-situ Treatment of Oiled Sediment Shorelines

Gary A Sergy , Chantal C Guénette , Edward H Owens , Roger C Prince , Kenneth Lee
{"title":"In-situ Treatment of Oiled Sediment Shorelines","authors":"Gary A Sergy ,&nbsp;Chantal C Guénette ,&nbsp;Edward H Owens ,&nbsp;Roger C Prince ,&nbsp;Kenneth Lee","doi":"10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00040-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Experimental oil spill studies were conducted to quantify the effectiveness of selected <em>in-situ</em><span><span> shoreline treatment options to accelerate natural oil removal processes on mixed-sediment (sand and pebble) shorelines. At each of three distinct shoreline sites, treatment test plots and control plots were established within a 40-, 80- and 143-m continuous stretch of oiled shoreline. A total of 5500 l of oil was deposited along a 3-m wide swath in the upper intertidal zone at each site. Approximately one week after oiling, a different treatment technique was applied to each plot. The treatment techniques were: sediment relocation (surf washing), mixing (tilling), bioremediation (fertilizer application), and bioremediation combined with mixing. One plot at each site was monitored for </span>natural attenuation<span>. The quantity of oil removed from the plots was measured six times up to 60 days post-treatment and then again one year later. Changes in the physical character of the beach, oil penetration, movement of oil to the subtidal environment, toxicity, and biodegradation were monitored over the 400-day period.</span></span></p><p>The results verified quantitatively that relocation of oiled sediments significantly accelerated the rate of oil removal from the shoreline by more than one year. Microscopic observations and image analyses confirmed that the oil–mineral aggregate formation process was active and was increased by sediment relocation. Oil biodegradation occurred in this arctic environment, both in the oiled sediments and on the fine mineral particles removed from the sediment by natural physical processes. The biodegradation of oil in sediment was significantly stimulated by simple bioremediation protocols. Mixing (by tilling) did not clearly stimulate oil loss and natural recovery in the context of this experimental design. None of the treatment techniques elevated toxicity in the nearshore environment to unacceptable levels, nor did they result in consequential alongshore or nearshore oiling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101181,"journal":{"name":"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 237-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00040-9","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353256103000409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Experimental oil spill studies were conducted to quantify the effectiveness of selected in-situ shoreline treatment options to accelerate natural oil removal processes on mixed-sediment (sand and pebble) shorelines. At each of three distinct shoreline sites, treatment test plots and control plots were established within a 40-, 80- and 143-m continuous stretch of oiled shoreline. A total of 5500 l of oil was deposited along a 3-m wide swath in the upper intertidal zone at each site. Approximately one week after oiling, a different treatment technique was applied to each plot. The treatment techniques were: sediment relocation (surf washing), mixing (tilling), bioremediation (fertilizer application), and bioremediation combined with mixing. One plot at each site was monitored for natural attenuation. The quantity of oil removed from the plots was measured six times up to 60 days post-treatment and then again one year later. Changes in the physical character of the beach, oil penetration, movement of oil to the subtidal environment, toxicity, and biodegradation were monitored over the 400-day period.

The results verified quantitatively that relocation of oiled sediments significantly accelerated the rate of oil removal from the shoreline by more than one year. Microscopic observations and image analyses confirmed that the oil–mineral aggregate formation process was active and was increased by sediment relocation. Oil biodegradation occurred in this arctic environment, both in the oiled sediments and on the fine mineral particles removed from the sediment by natural physical processes. The biodegradation of oil in sediment was significantly stimulated by simple bioremediation protocols. Mixing (by tilling) did not clearly stimulate oil loss and natural recovery in the context of this experimental design. None of the treatment techniques elevated toxicity in the nearshore environment to unacceptable levels, nor did they result in consequential alongshore or nearshore oiling.

岸线含油沉积物的原位处理
进行了溢油实验研究,以量化选定的原位岸线处理方案的有效性,以加速混合沉积物(砂和卵石)岸线的自然除油过程。在三个不同的海岸线上,分别在40米、80米和143米的海岸线上建立了处理试验区和对照区。在每个地点,沿潮间带上部3米宽的狭长地带,共沉积了5500升石油。涂油后大约一周,对每个地块采用不同的处理技术。处理技术有:沉积物迁移(冲沙)、混合(耕作)、生物修复(施肥)和生物修复与混合相结合。每个地点都监测了一个地块的自然衰减情况。在处理后60天内,从地块中去除的油量测量了6次,然后在一年后再次测量。在400天的时间里,对海滩物理特性的变化、石油的渗透、石油向潮下环境的移动、毒性和生物降解进行了监测。结果定量地证实,油污沉积物的迁移使海岸线的除油速度显著加快了一年以上。显微观察和图像分析证实了油气集合体的形成过程是活跃的,并因沉积物迁移而增加。石油的生物降解发生在北极环境中,既发生在含油沉积物中,也发生在通过自然物理过程从沉积物中去除的细矿物颗粒上。简单的生物修复方案显著促进了沉积物中石油的生物降解。在这个实验设计的背景下,混合(通过耕作)并没有明显地刺激石油损失和自然采收率。这些处理技术都没有将近岸环境中的毒性提高到不可接受的水平,也没有导致沿岸或近岸的油污。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信