Rethinking Innovation and Development Discourses in the Light of COVID-19

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
F. Sheikh, Xiaobo Wu
{"title":"Rethinking Innovation and Development Discourses in the Light of COVID-19","authors":"F. Sheikh, Xiaobo Wu","doi":"10.1177/09717218231178199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has cast new light on worldwide socioeconomic susceptibility to exogenous shocks. This crisis has been framed unlike any other in modern memory (Schwab & Malleret, 2020). The virus was initially thought to be a mild outbreak in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 but soon spread to 216 countries (Ke & Hsiao, 2021). The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Covid dashboard indicated 540,923,532 confirmed cases of COVID-19 as of June 27, 2022, resulting in 6,325,785 deaths globally. WHO declared the virus a global health emergency as it quickly moved beyond China. The United Nations Secretary—General Antonio Guterres stated that the pandemic is responsible for the largest economic catastrophe and highest unemployment since the Great Depression; COVID-19 has also endangered human rights (Ke & Hsiao, 2021). Yet, these circumstances are not exactly unprecedented. Jordà et al. (2020) investigated pandemics dating back to the 14th century and identified considerable negative macroeconomic repercussions as outbreaks persisted for decades. Some economists have conten-ded that this pandemic will lead to severe economic crises (Gans, 2020) as well. Subsequent studies (e.g., Jordà et al., 2020) similarly suggested that COVID-19 will have enduring consequences on the world’s economy, such as considerably lower return rates, with no nation escaping untouched. Susskind and Vines (2020) pointed out that this pandemic has triggered the most severe global economic consequences since the South Sea Bubble burst in 1720. Indeed, a World Bank analysis showed that COVID-19 caused economic activity to fall in nearly 90% of countries in 2020—exceeding the proportion of nations that saw similar declines during the Great Depression in the 1930s and the two world wars combined. Global economic contraction of almost 3% and a generation-first rise in poverty","PeriodicalId":45432,"journal":{"name":"Science Technology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231178199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has cast new light on worldwide socioeconomic susceptibility to exogenous shocks. This crisis has been framed unlike any other in modern memory (Schwab & Malleret, 2020). The virus was initially thought to be a mild outbreak in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 but soon spread to 216 countries (Ke & Hsiao, 2021). The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Covid dashboard indicated 540,923,532 confirmed cases of COVID-19 as of June 27, 2022, resulting in 6,325,785 deaths globally. WHO declared the virus a global health emergency as it quickly moved beyond China. The United Nations Secretary—General Antonio Guterres stated that the pandemic is responsible for the largest economic catastrophe and highest unemployment since the Great Depression; COVID-19 has also endangered human rights (Ke & Hsiao, 2021). Yet, these circumstances are not exactly unprecedented. Jordà et al. (2020) investigated pandemics dating back to the 14th century and identified considerable negative macroeconomic repercussions as outbreaks persisted for decades. Some economists have conten-ded that this pandemic will lead to severe economic crises (Gans, 2020) as well. Subsequent studies (e.g., Jordà et al., 2020) similarly suggested that COVID-19 will have enduring consequences on the world’s economy, such as considerably lower return rates, with no nation escaping untouched. Susskind and Vines (2020) pointed out that this pandemic has triggered the most severe global economic consequences since the South Sea Bubble burst in 1720. Indeed, a World Bank analysis showed that COVID-19 caused economic activity to fall in nearly 90% of countries in 2020—exceeding the proportion of nations that saw similar declines during the Great Depression in the 1930s and the two world wars combined. Global economic contraction of almost 3% and a generation-first rise in poverty
新冠肺炎疫情下的创新与发展话语反思
2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球社会经济对外部冲击的易感性有了新的认识。这场危机的框架与现代记忆中的任何其他危机都不同(Schwab & Malleret, 2020)。该病毒最初被认为是2019年12月在中国武汉爆发的轻微疫情,但很快蔓延到216个国家(Ke & Hsiao, 2021年)。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的Covid仪表板显示,截至2022年6月27日,全球共有540,923,532例Covid -19确诊病例,导致6,325,785人死亡。随着该病毒迅速蔓延到中国以外,世卫组织宣布该病毒为全球卫生紧急事件。联合国秘书长安东尼奥·古特雷斯表示,新冠肺炎疫情造成了自大萧条以来最严重的经济灾难和最高失业率;COVID-19也危及人权(Ke & Hsiao, 2021)。然而,这些情况并非完全没有先例。jord等人(2020)调查了可追溯到14世纪的大流行,并发现疫情持续数十年,对宏观经济产生了相当大的负面影响。一些经济学家认为,这次大流行也将导致严重的经济危机(Gans, 2020)。随后的研究(如jord等人,2020年)同样表明,2019冠状病毒病将对世界经济产生持久影响,例如回报率大幅下降,没有一个国家能幸免。Susskind和Vines(2020)指出,这次大流行引发了自1720年南海泡沫破裂以来最严重的全球经济后果。事实上,世界银行的一项分析显示,2020年,COVID-19导致近90%的国家的经济活动下降,超过了上世纪30年代大萧条和两次世界大战期间出现类似下降的国家所占比例。全球经济收缩近3%,贫困人口首次出现增长
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Science, Technology and Society is an international journal devoted to the study of science and technology in social context. It focuses on the way in which advances in science and technology influence society and vice versa. It is a peer-reviewed journal that takes an interdisciplinary perspective, encouraging analyses whose approaches are drawn from a variety of disciplines such as history, sociology, philosophy, economics, political science and international relations, science policy involving innovation, foresight studies involving science and technology, technology management, environmental studies, energy studies and gender studies. The journal consciously endeavors to combine scholarly perspectives relevant to academic research and policy issues relating to development. Besides research articles the journal encourages research-based country reports, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信