When is it advisable to introduce analogies to foster creativity in education? (¿Cuándo es aconsejable introducir analogías para fomentar la creatividad en la educación?)

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Héctor M. Manrique, A. Marín, Henriette Zeidler
{"title":"When is it advisable to introduce analogies to foster creativity in education? (¿Cuándo es aconsejable introducir analogías para fomentar la creatividad en la educación?)","authors":"Héctor M. Manrique, A. Marín, Henriette Zeidler","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2022.2039536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reasoning by analogy is a form of inductive reasoning that in humans has been linked to fluid intelligence. It is a powerful driver of creativity as it allows us to make inferences in unknown domains by drawing parallels to domains we are familiar with, thus offering safe ground for speculation. Given that some of the most ingenious minds in human history (e.g., Leonardo da Vinci) stand out in their capacity to apply analogies to new fields of knowledge, and because actual scientific breakthroughs have been made based on analogical reasoning, it is reasonable to assume that analogies could be used as a mind-opener which helps students to foster their creativity and innovativeness. The question remains when children are mature enough for analogies to be introduced and profitably used in the classroom. We review how analogical reasoning and working memory develop throughout ontogeny in order to predict when children are sufficiently cognitively mature to benefit from using analogies as a learning tool.","PeriodicalId":51688,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"403 - 423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2039536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reasoning by analogy is a form of inductive reasoning that in humans has been linked to fluid intelligence. It is a powerful driver of creativity as it allows us to make inferences in unknown domains by drawing parallels to domains we are familiar with, thus offering safe ground for speculation. Given that some of the most ingenious minds in human history (e.g., Leonardo da Vinci) stand out in their capacity to apply analogies to new fields of knowledge, and because actual scientific breakthroughs have been made based on analogical reasoning, it is reasonable to assume that analogies could be used as a mind-opener which helps students to foster their creativity and innovativeness. The question remains when children are mature enough for analogies to be introduced and profitably used in the classroom. We review how analogical reasoning and working memory develop throughout ontogeny in order to predict when children are sufficiently cognitively mature to benefit from using analogies as a learning tool.
什么时候引入类比以促进教育的创造性?(什么时候引入类比以鼓励教育中的创造力?)
类比推理是归纳推理的一种形式,在人类中与流体智力有关。它是创造力的强大驱动力,因为它允许我们通过将我们熟悉的领域与未知领域进行类比来进行推断,从而为猜测提供安全的基础。考虑到人类历史上一些最聪明的人(如列奥纳多·达·芬奇)在将类比应用于新知识领域的能力上脱颖而出,而且由于实际的科学突破都是基于类比推理取得的,我们有理由认为类比可以被用来打开思维,帮助学生培养他们的创造力和创新精神。问题仍然是,孩子们什么时候才足够成熟,可以在课堂上引入并有益地使用类比。我们回顾了类比推理和工作记忆是如何在个体发育过程中发展的,以预测儿童何时认知成熟到足以从使用类比作为学习工具中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture and Education
Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信