Distinct impact of three different statins on arteriovenous fistula outcomes: a retrospective analysis.

Laisel Martinez, Juan C Duque, Luis A Escobar, Marwan Tabbara, Arif Asif, Fadi Fayad, Roberto I Vazquez-Padron, Loay H Salman
{"title":"Distinct impact of three different statins on arteriovenous fistula outcomes: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Laisel Martinez, Juan C Duque, Luis A Escobar, Marwan Tabbara, Arif Asif, Fadi Fayad, Roberto I Vazquez-Padron, Loay H Salman","doi":"10.5301/jva.5000612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Whether statins improve arteriovenous fistula (AVF) outcomes is still a matter of debate. Taking into consideration the existing physicochemical differences between individual drugs, this study evaluates the impact of three different statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin) on one-stage and two-stage AVF outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective cohort of 535 patients, we analyzed the effects of each statin on primary failure and primary patency using multivariate logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the three statins analyzed, only atorvastatin improved the overall primary failure of AVF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.18, p = 0.005). Comparisons between the two AVF types demonstrated that this effect was due to a prominent reduction in primary failure of one-stage (OR = 0.03; p = 0.005), but not two-stage fistulas (OR = 0.43; p = 0.25). In contrast, primary patency of two-stage (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.51; p = 0.024), but not one-stage fistulas (HR = 0.98; p = 0.95), was improved by all statins as a group, but not by individual drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the potential benefit of statins on AVF outcomes is a drug-specific and not a class effect, and that such effect is also influenced by the type of fistula.</p>","PeriodicalId":84992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","volume":"26 1","pages":"471-476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10970648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Whether statins improve arteriovenous fistula (AVF) outcomes is still a matter of debate. Taking into consideration the existing physicochemical differences between individual drugs, this study evaluates the impact of three different statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin) on one-stage and two-stage AVF outcomes.

Methods: Using a retrospective cohort of 535 patients, we analyzed the effects of each statin on primary failure and primary patency using multivariate logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: Out of the three statins analyzed, only atorvastatin improved the overall primary failure of AVF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.18, p = 0.005). Comparisons between the two AVF types demonstrated that this effect was due to a prominent reduction in primary failure of one-stage (OR = 0.03; p = 0.005), but not two-stage fistulas (OR = 0.43; p = 0.25). In contrast, primary patency of two-stage (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.51; p = 0.024), but not one-stage fistulas (HR = 0.98; p = 0.95), was improved by all statins as a group, but not by individual drugs.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the potential benefit of statins on AVF outcomes is a drug-specific and not a class effect, and that such effect is also influenced by the type of fistula.

三种不同他汀类药物对动静脉瘘预后的不同影响:回顾性分析。
目的:他汀类药物是否能改善动静脉瘘(AVF)的预后仍存在争议。考虑到不同药物之间存在的理化差异,本研究评估了三种不同他汀类药物(阿托伐他汀、罗苏伐他汀和辛伐他汀)对一期和二期动静脉瘘预后的影响:我们使用多变量逻辑回归和 Cox 比例危险模型,分析了每种他汀类药物对初次失败和初次通畅率的影响:结果:在分析的三种他汀类药物中,只有阿托伐他汀能改善动静脉瘘的总体初次失败率(几率比 [OR] = 0.18,P = 0.005)。两种动静脉瘘类型之间的比较表明,这种效应主要是由于一级瘘管(OR = 0.03;p = 0.005)的初次失败率显著降低,而不是二级瘘管(OR = 0.43;p = 0.25)。与此相反,所有他汀类药物作为一个群体,而不是单个药物,都能改善两段式瘘管的初次通畅率(危险比 [HR] = 0.51;p = 0.024),但不能改善一段式瘘管的初次通畅率(HR = 0.98;p = 0.95):我们的研究结果表明,他汀类药物对动静脉瘘预后的潜在益处是药物特异性效应,而不是类药物效应,而且这种效应还受到瘘管类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信