Data Collection Practices for Compiling Confucian School Library Book Lists in Ming and Qing Local Gazetteers

IF 0.4 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Joseph Dennis
{"title":"Data Collection Practices for Compiling Confucian School Library Book Lists in Ming and Qing Local Gazetteers","authors":"Joseph Dennis","doi":"10.1080/02549948.2021.1989783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local gazetteers are a key source for Chinese history, but relatively little is known about how compilers obtained the information they presented in their finished works. Examining data collection practices for gazetteers is not only important to understanding the production processes and contents, but also can shed light on a variety of questions related to locality and geographical knowledge in imperial China. Tensions between standardization and localization may be revealed, the politics of geographical knowledge can be highlighted, and who was served by geographical knowledge may be shown through analysis of collection practices. This article explores data collection for Confucian school library book lists in the Ming and Qing and argues that list data came from various sources: accounting registers, on-site inspections, transcriptions of stelae and wooden plaques that recorded book acquisitions, other gazetteers, and court publications. List compilers approached their lists in different ways and lists could be comprehensive, selective, or normative in nature.","PeriodicalId":41653,"journal":{"name":"Monumenta Serica-Journal of Oriental Studies","volume":"544 1","pages":"487 - 513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monumenta Serica-Journal of Oriental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.2021.1989783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local gazetteers are a key source for Chinese history, but relatively little is known about how compilers obtained the information they presented in their finished works. Examining data collection practices for gazetteers is not only important to understanding the production processes and contents, but also can shed light on a variety of questions related to locality and geographical knowledge in imperial China. Tensions between standardization and localization may be revealed, the politics of geographical knowledge can be highlighted, and who was served by geographical knowledge may be shown through analysis of collection practices. This article explores data collection for Confucian school library book lists in the Ming and Qing and argues that list data came from various sources: accounting registers, on-site inspections, transcriptions of stelae and wooden plaques that recorded book acquisitions, other gazetteers, and court publications. List compilers approached their lists in different ways and lists could be comprehensive, selective, or normative in nature.
明清地方志儒家书库书目编制的数据收集实践
地方志是了解中国历史的重要来源,但对于编纂者如何获得他们在完成的作品中呈现的信息,人们知之甚少。检查地名词典的数据收集实践不仅对了解生产过程和内容很重要,而且可以阐明与中国帝制地区和地理知识有关的各种问题。可以揭示标准化与地方化之间的紧张关系,突出地理知识的政治性,并可以通过收集实践的分析显示地理知识为谁服务。本文探讨了明清时期儒家图书馆图书目录的数据收集,并认为目录数据来自各种来源:会计登记簿、现场检查、记录图书收购的石碑和木匾的抄写、其他地名志和宫廷出版物。列表编纂者以不同的方式处理他们的列表,列表可以是全面的、选择性的或规范性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信