Understanding the low uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids: a review.

R. Powell, A. Wearden, S. M. Pardesi, K. Green
{"title":"Understanding the low uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids: a review.","authors":"R. Powell, A. Wearden, S. M. Pardesi, K. Green","doi":"10.1017/S0022215116009981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBone-anchored hearing aids improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids is low and it is important to understand why this is the case.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline bone-anchored hearing aids and satisfaction levels of people with bone-anchored hearing aids were reviewed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nReasons for declining bone-anchored hearing aids included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of the reasons for declining or accepting bone-anchored hearing aids were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with bone-anchored hearing aids. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with bone-anchored hearing aids.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nImportant avenues for further research are in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the decision-making process for bone-anchored hearing aids and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction of people who receive bone-anchored hearing aids with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.","PeriodicalId":76651,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","volume":"25 1","pages":"190-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bone-anchored hearing aids improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids is low and it is important to understand why this is the case. METHOD A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline bone-anchored hearing aids and satisfaction levels of people with bone-anchored hearing aids were reviewed. RESULTS Reasons for declining bone-anchored hearing aids included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of the reasons for declining or accepting bone-anchored hearing aids were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with bone-anchored hearing aids. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with bone-anchored hearing aids. CONCLUSION Important avenues for further research are in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the decision-making process for bone-anchored hearing aids and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction of people who receive bone-anchored hearing aids with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.
了解骨锚定助听器的低吸收:综述。
背景骨锚式助听器可以改善传统耳后助听器有问题的患者的听力。然而,骨锚式助听器的使用率很低,了解原因很重要。方法采用叙述性综述法。研究人员回顾了人们接受或拒绝骨锚助听器的原因以及人们对骨锚助听器的满意度。结果骨锚式助听器使用人数下降的原因包括认知效益有限、对手术的担忧、对美观的担忧和治疗费用。没有研究对拒绝或接受骨锚助听器的原因进行深入分析。对患者满意度的研究表明,大多数参与者都报告了使用骨锚助听器的好处。然而,大多数研究采用横断面和/或回顾性设计,并且只包括使用骨锚定助听器的人。结论深入的定性研究旨在充分了解骨锚定助听器的决策过程,严格的定量研究比较接受骨锚定助听器和接受替代(或不接受)治疗的人的满意度,是进一步研究的重要途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信