Optimal Waist Circumference Cut-Off Point for Multiple Risk Factor Aggregation: Results from the Maracaibo City Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence Study

Valmore Bermúdez, Joselyn Rojas, J. Salazar, R. Añez, Mervin Chávez-Castillo, R. González, M. Martínez, Mayela Cabrera, Clímaco Cano, M. Velasco, J. López-Miranda
{"title":"Optimal Waist Circumference Cut-Off Point for Multiple Risk Factor Aggregation: Results from the Maracaibo City Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence Study","authors":"Valmore Bermúdez, Joselyn Rojas, J. Salazar, R. Añez, Mervin Chávez-Castillo, R. González, M. Martínez, Mayela Cabrera, Clímaco Cano, M. Velasco, J. López-Miranda","doi":"10.1155/2014/718571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context and Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine optimal waist circumference (WC) cut-off values for the detection of multiple risk factor aggregation in individuals from Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants and Methods. A total of 1,902 adult individuals of both genders belonging to MMSPS were included. Complete physical, laboratory, and anthropometric examination were done to evaluate Metabolic Syndrome (MS) components and insulin resistance. ROC curves were plotted for risk factor aggregation in order to assess WC cut-off point. Logistic regression models were constructed to assess risk factors associated with the WC. Results. There were 52.2% females and 47.8% males, with WC of  cm and  cm, respectively. ROC curves exhibited a WC cut-off point for women of 90.25 cm (68.4% sensitivity, 65.8% specificity) and 95.15 cm (71.1% sensitivity, 67.4% specificity) for men. HOMA2-IR and high blood pressure were associated with a WC over these cut-off points, as well as 2.5-fold risk increase for multiple risk factor aggregation (OR 2.56; CI 95%: 2.05–3.20; ). Conclusions. These population-specific WC cut-offs are readily applicable tools for detection of risk factor aggregation. Insulin resistance is closely associated with this definition of abdominal obesity, which may serve as a surrogate for its assessment.","PeriodicalId":89674,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology Research International","volume":"62 1 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/718571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Context and Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine optimal waist circumference (WC) cut-off values for the detection of multiple risk factor aggregation in individuals from Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants and Methods. A total of 1,902 adult individuals of both genders belonging to MMSPS were included. Complete physical, laboratory, and anthropometric examination were done to evaluate Metabolic Syndrome (MS) components and insulin resistance. ROC curves were plotted for risk factor aggregation in order to assess WC cut-off point. Logistic regression models were constructed to assess risk factors associated with the WC. Results. There were 52.2% females and 47.8% males, with WC of  cm and  cm, respectively. ROC curves exhibited a WC cut-off point for women of 90.25 cm (68.4% sensitivity, 65.8% specificity) and 95.15 cm (71.1% sensitivity, 67.4% specificity) for men. HOMA2-IR and high blood pressure were associated with a WC over these cut-off points, as well as 2.5-fold risk increase for multiple risk factor aggregation (OR 2.56; CI 95%: 2.05–3.20; ). Conclusions. These population-specific WC cut-offs are readily applicable tools for detection of risk factor aggregation. Insulin resistance is closely associated with this definition of abdominal obesity, which may serve as a surrogate for its assessment.
多重危险因素聚集的最佳腰围分界点:来自马拉开波市代谢综合征患病率研究的结果
背景和目标。本研究的目的是确定来自委内瑞拉马拉开波的个体检测多种危险因素聚集的最佳腰围(WC)临界值。参与者和方法。共有1,902名属于MMSPS的男女成年人被纳入。完成了完整的物理、实验室和人体测量检查,以评估代谢综合征(MS)成分和胰岛素抵抗。绘制危险因素聚集的ROC曲线,以评估WC分界点。建立Logistic回归模型来评估与WC相关的危险因素。结果。雌性占52.2%,雄性占47.8%,腰围分别为cm和cm。ROC曲线显示,女性的WC截止点为90.25 cm(敏感度68.4%,特异度65.8%),男性为95.15 cm(敏感度71.1%,特异度67.4%)。HOMA2-IR和高血压与超过这些分界点的WC相关,以及多危险因素聚集的风险增加2.5倍(OR 2.56;Ci 95%: 2.05-3.20;)。结论。这些特定人群的WC截止值是检测风险因素聚集的现成适用工具。胰岛素抵抗与腹部肥胖的定义密切相关,可以作为评估的替代指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信