Abū Bakr al-Rāzī, Doutes sur Galien, introduction, edition and French translation by Pauline Koetschet (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019), cxxxviii-347 p.
{"title":"Abū Bakr al-Rāzī, Doutes sur Galien, introduction, edition and French translation by Pauline Koetschet (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019), cxxxviii-347 p.","authors":"Fabian Käs","doi":"10.1017/S0957423919000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abū Bakr al-Rāzī, Doutes sur Galien, introduction, edition and French translation by Pauline Koetschet (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019), cxxxviii-347 p. One of the crucial questions often posed concerning the natural sciences of the Islamicate Middle Ages is that of their innovativeness. Especially regarding medicine, it was a commonplace point of criticism since the early modern period that its protagonists only preserved the achievements of Classical Antiquity without further developments. Modern research has challenged this theory pointing out that the medieval Arabs did not follow the ideas of Galen – by far the most prominent ancient medical authority – unquestioned in all circumstances. One of the principal works of this genre is Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Zakariyyāʾ al-Rāzī’s (d. ca. 313/925) Shukūk ʿalā Jālīnūs (“Doubts about Galen”), which has now been edited anew by Pauline Koetschet. Her edition accompanied by a superb French translation and rich annotations makes this fundamental medicophilosophical work for the first time accessible to a wider scientific public. Galen, who is famous for his claim that “the best physician must be a philosopher”, often dealt with philosophy in his medical works and wrote monographs on this topic, such as a lost voluminous book on logic entitled Περὶ ἀποδείξεως / Kitāb al-burhān and several others 1. These works, often contradicting classical Aristotelian approaches, aroused criticism already during his lifetime, when Alexander of","PeriodicalId":43433,"journal":{"name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"155 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423919000134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abū Bakr al-Rāzī, Doutes sur Galien, introduction, edition and French translation by Pauline Koetschet (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019), cxxxviii-347 p. One of the crucial questions often posed concerning the natural sciences of the Islamicate Middle Ages is that of their innovativeness. Especially regarding medicine, it was a commonplace point of criticism since the early modern period that its protagonists only preserved the achievements of Classical Antiquity without further developments. Modern research has challenged this theory pointing out that the medieval Arabs did not follow the ideas of Galen – by far the most prominent ancient medical authority – unquestioned in all circumstances. One of the principal works of this genre is Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Zakariyyāʾ al-Rāzī’s (d. ca. 313/925) Shukūk ʿalā Jālīnūs (“Doubts about Galen”), which has now been edited anew by Pauline Koetschet. Her edition accompanied by a superb French translation and rich annotations makes this fundamental medicophilosophical work for the first time accessible to a wider scientific public. Galen, who is famous for his claim that “the best physician must be a philosopher”, often dealt with philosophy in his medical works and wrote monographs on this topic, such as a lost voluminous book on logic entitled Περὶ ἀποδείξεως / Kitāb al-burhān and several others 1. These works, often contradicting classical Aristotelian approaches, aroused criticism already during his lifetime, when Alexander of
abi Bakr al-Rāzī,《Galien》,Pauline Koetschet的介绍、版本和法语翻译(柏林,波士顿:De Gruyter, 2019), cxxxii -347页。关于伊斯兰教中世纪的自然科学,经常提出的关键问题之一是它们的创新性。特别是在医学方面,自近代早期以来,人们就普遍批评医学的主角们只保留了古典时代的成就,没有进一步的发展。现代研究对这一理论提出了挑战,指出中世纪的阿拉伯人并没有在任何情况下毫无疑问地遵循盖伦的思想。盖伦是迄今为止最著名的古代医学权威。这一流派的主要作品之一是abybakr Muḥammad ibn zakariyyyahal-Rāzī ' s (d. ca. 313/925) Shukūk ' al ' Jālīnūs(“关于盖伦的怀疑”),现在由Pauline Koetschet重新编辑。她的版本伴随着精湛的法语翻译和丰富的注释,使这个基本的医学哲学工作第一次进入更广泛的科学公众。盖伦以其“最好的医生必须是哲学家”的主张而闻名,他在医学著作中经常涉及哲学,并撰写了关于这一主题的专著,例如一本失传的关于逻辑的大部头书,题为Περ ς ποδε到ξεως / Kitāb al-burhān和其他几本1。这些作品,经常与古典亚里士多德的方法相矛盾,在他的有生之年就已经引起了批评,当亚历山大
期刊介绍:
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy (ASP) is an international journal devoted to the Arabic sciences, mathematics and philosophy in the world of Islam between the eighth and eighteenth centuries, in a cross-cultural context. In 2009, the journal extended its scope to include important papers on scientific modernization from the nineteenth century in the Islamic world. Together with original studies on the history of all these fields, ASP also offers work on the inter-relations between Arabic and Greek, Indian, Chinese, Latin, Byzantine, Syriac and Hebrew sciences and philosophy. Casting new light on the growth of these disciplines, as well as on the social and ideological context in which this growth took place, ASP is essential reading for those interested in these areas.