PCR-HRM for Detecting JAK2V617F Gene Mutation: Is It a Sensitive Assay?

M. Rezaei, M. Toutkaboni, Babak Salimi, S. Seifi, F. Sheikholeslami
{"title":"PCR-HRM for Detecting JAK2V617F Gene Mutation: Is It a Sensitive Assay?","authors":"M. Rezaei, M. Toutkaboni, Babak Salimi, S. Seifi, F. Sheikholeslami","doi":"10.18502/BCCR.V11I4.5722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A substitution of G to T at nucleotide 1849 in exon 14 of the Janus kinase2 (JAK2) gene is well recognized in myeloproliferative neoplastic disorders (MPNs). Based on WHO guidelines, detection of the mutation is very important to confirm the disease in suspected patients. Methods: Eighty-seven patients with different background diseases were tested for JAK2 V617F mutation by four different methods, including polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), polymerase chain reaction-high resolution melting (PCR-HRM), and two different commercial kits. Results: The mean age of patients was 53.38±17.43 years, 72.4% were males, and 37.6% were females. JAK2 mutation was detected in 16 patients (18.3%). Of those, 7 (43.75%) suffered from PV, 5 (31.25%) from ET, 3 (18.75%) from PMF, and 1 (6.15%) from unclassified neoplastic disorders. The frequency of JAK2 mutation was 71.4% (5/7) in PV, 80% (4/5) in ET, and 66.7% (2/3) in PMF patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and GE of PCR-HRM for detection of the JAK2 mutation was 86.7%, 100%, 100%, 97.3%, and 97.7%, respectively. While the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and GE of PCR-RFLP were 93.3%, 80.5%, 50%, 98.3%, and 82.7%, respectively. On the other hand, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and GE of ARMS assays were evaluated by about 80%, 96%, 100%, 96%, and 96.5%, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that PCR-HRM was a more sensitive assay to detect the JAK2 V617F mutation than the other assays. So, it can be used as a quick, easy, and effective method for screening the JAK2 V617F mutation in patients with MPNs disorders. PCR-RFLP must accompany it as a gold standard method for confirmation of the mutation of JAK2 V617F.","PeriodicalId":8706,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/BCCR.V11I4.5722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A substitution of G to T at nucleotide 1849 in exon 14 of the Janus kinase2 (JAK2) gene is well recognized in myeloproliferative neoplastic disorders (MPNs). Based on WHO guidelines, detection of the mutation is very important to confirm the disease in suspected patients. Methods: Eighty-seven patients with different background diseases were tested for JAK2 V617F mutation by four different methods, including polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), polymerase chain reaction-high resolution melting (PCR-HRM), and two different commercial kits. Results: The mean age of patients was 53.38±17.43 years, 72.4% were males, and 37.6% were females. JAK2 mutation was detected in 16 patients (18.3%). Of those, 7 (43.75%) suffered from PV, 5 (31.25%) from ET, 3 (18.75%) from PMF, and 1 (6.15%) from unclassified neoplastic disorders. The frequency of JAK2 mutation was 71.4% (5/7) in PV, 80% (4/5) in ET, and 66.7% (2/3) in PMF patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and GE of PCR-HRM for detection of the JAK2 mutation was 86.7%, 100%, 100%, 97.3%, and 97.7%, respectively. While the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and GE of PCR-RFLP were 93.3%, 80.5%, 50%, 98.3%, and 82.7%, respectively. On the other hand, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and GE of ARMS assays were evaluated by about 80%, 96%, 100%, 96%, and 96.5%, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that PCR-HRM was a more sensitive assay to detect the JAK2 V617F mutation than the other assays. So, it can be used as a quick, easy, and effective method for screening the JAK2 V617F mutation in patients with MPNs disorders. PCR-RFLP must accompany it as a gold standard method for confirmation of the mutation of JAK2 V617F.
PCR-HRM检测JAK2V617F基因突变:是一种敏感的检测方法吗?
背景:在骨髓增殖性肿瘤疾病(mpn)中,Janus激酶2 (JAK2)基因14外显子1849核苷酸G被T取代是公认的。根据世卫组织指南,检测突变对于在疑似患者中确认疾病非常重要。方法:采用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)、扩增难解突变系统(ARMS)、聚合酶链反应-高分辨率熔融(PCR-HRM)和两种不同的商用试剂盒对87例不同背景疾病患者进行JAK2 V617F突变检测。结果:患者平均年龄53.38±17.43岁,男性占72.4%,女性占37.6%。16例(18.3%)患者检测到JAK2突变。其中,PV 7例(43.75%),ET 5例(31.25%),PMF 3例(18.75%),未分类肿瘤疾病1例(6.15%)。JAK2突变频率在PV中为71.4% (5/7),ET中为80% (4/5),PMF中为66.7%(2/3)。PCR-HRM检测JAK2突变的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和GE分别为86.7%、100%、100%、97.3%和97.7%。PCR-RFLP的敏感性为93.3%,特异性为80.5%,PPV为50%,NPV为98.3%,GE为82.7%。ARMS法的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和GE分别约为80%、96%、100%、96%和96.5%。结论:PCR-HRM检测JAK2 V617F突变的灵敏度高于其他检测方法。因此,它可以作为一种快速、简便、有效的筛选mpn疾病患者JAK2 V617F突变的方法。PCR-RFLP必须作为确认JAK2 V617F突变的金标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信