The Use of Intact Fish Skin as a Novel Treatment Method for Deep Dermal Burns Following Enzymatic Debridement: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Christoph Wallner, Jana Holtermann, Marius Drysch, Sonja Schmidt, Felix Reinkemeier, Johannes Maximilian Wagner, Mehran Dadras, Alexander Sogorski, Khosrow Siamak Houschyar, Mustafa Becerikli, Marcus Lehnhardt, Björn Behr
{"title":"The Use of Intact Fish Skin as a Novel Treatment Method for Deep Dermal Burns Following Enzymatic Debridement: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.","authors":"Christoph Wallner, Jana Holtermann, Marius Drysch, Sonja Schmidt, Felix Reinkemeier, Johannes Maximilian Wagner, Mehran Dadras, Alexander Sogorski, Khosrow Siamak Houschyar, Mustafa Becerikli, Marcus Lehnhardt, Björn Behr","doi":"10.3390/ebj3010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal therapy for deep burn wounds is based on the early debridement of necrotic tissue followed by wound coverage to avoid a systemic inflammatory response and optimize scar-free healing. The outcomes are affected by available resources and underlying patient factors, which represent challenges in burn care and suboptimal outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine optimal burn-wound management using enzymatic debridement (NexoBrid™, MediWound Germany GmbH, Rüsselsheim, Germany) and intact fish skin (Kerecis<sup>®</sup> Omega3 Wound, Isafjordur, Iceland).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, 12 patients with superficial or deep dermal burn wounds were treated with enzymatic debridement followed by fish skin, Suprathel<sup>®</sup> (PolyMedics Innovations GmbH, Denkendorf, Germany), or a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Patients' outcomes regarding healing and scar quality were collected objectively and subjectively for 12 months after the burn injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wounds treated with fish skin demonstrated accelerated wound healing, a significantly higher water-storage capacity, and better pain relief. Furthermore, improved functional and cosmetic outcomes, such as elasticity, skin thickness, and pigmentation, were demonstrated. The pain and itch expressed as POSAS scores (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) for fish skin decreased compared to those for wounds managed with an STSG or Suprathel. Importantly, fish skin-treated wounds had significantly improved sebum production and skin elasticity than those treated with Suprathel but showed no significant superiority compared to STSG-treated wounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enzymatic debridement in combination with intact fish skin grafts resulted in the faster healing of burn wounds and better functional and aesthetic outcomes than split-thickness skin grafts and Suprathel treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"75 1","pages":"43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal therapy for deep burn wounds is based on the early debridement of necrotic tissue followed by wound coverage to avoid a systemic inflammatory response and optimize scar-free healing. The outcomes are affected by available resources and underlying patient factors, which represent challenges in burn care and suboptimal outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine optimal burn-wound management using enzymatic debridement (NexoBrid™, MediWound Germany GmbH, Rüsselsheim, Germany) and intact fish skin (Kerecis® Omega3 Wound, Isafjordur, Iceland).

Methods: In this retrospective case series, 12 patients with superficial or deep dermal burn wounds were treated with enzymatic debridement followed by fish skin, Suprathel® (PolyMedics Innovations GmbH, Denkendorf, Germany), or a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Patients' outcomes regarding healing and scar quality were collected objectively and subjectively for 12 months after the burn injury.

Results: Wounds treated with fish skin demonstrated accelerated wound healing, a significantly higher water-storage capacity, and better pain relief. Furthermore, improved functional and cosmetic outcomes, such as elasticity, skin thickness, and pigmentation, were demonstrated. The pain and itch expressed as POSAS scores (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) for fish skin decreased compared to those for wounds managed with an STSG or Suprathel. Importantly, fish skin-treated wounds had significantly improved sebum production and skin elasticity than those treated with Suprathel but showed no significant superiority compared to STSG-treated wounds.

Conclusions: Enzymatic debridement in combination with intact fish skin grafts resulted in the faster healing of burn wounds and better functional and aesthetic outcomes than split-thickness skin grafts and Suprathel treatment.

使用完整鱼皮作为酶清创后深层皮肤烧伤的新型治疗方法:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
背景:深度烧伤创面的最佳治疗方法是早期清除坏死组织,然后覆盖创面,以避免全身炎症反应,优化无疤痕愈合。治疗效果受可用资源和患者潜在因素的影响,这些因素是烧伤护理中的挑战,也是治疗效果不理想的原因。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定使用酶清创法(NexoBrid™,德国 MediWound GmbH,德国吕塞尔斯海姆)和完整鱼皮(Kerecis® Omega3 Wound,冰岛 Isafjordur)的最佳烧伤创面处理方法:在这项回顾性病例系列研究中,对 12 名浅表或深层真皮烧伤创面患者进行了酶清创治疗,然后使用鱼皮、Suprathel®(PolyMedics Innovations GmbH,德国登肯多夫)或劈开式厚皮移植术(STSG)。在烧伤后的 12 个月内,客观和主观地收集了患者的愈合情况和疤痕质量:结果:使用鱼皮治疗的伤口愈合更快,储水能力显著提高,疼痛缓解效果更好。此外,弹性、皮肤厚度和色素沉着等功能和外观效果也得到了改善。与使用 STSG 或 Suprathel 处理的伤口相比,鱼皮的疼痛和瘙痒程度(以 POSAS 评分(患者和观察者疤痕评估量表)表示)均有所减轻。重要的是,与使用 Suprathel 处理的伤口相比,鱼皮处理的伤口在皮脂分泌和皮肤弹性方面有明显改善,但与 STSG 处理的伤口相比,鱼皮处理的伤口没有明显优势:结论:与分层植皮和 Suprathel 治疗相比,酶清创结合完整鱼皮移植可使烧伤创面更快愈合,并获得更好的功能和美学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信