A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete

Caitlin M. Tibbetts Ph.D. , Kyle A. Riding Ph.D. , Christopher C. Ferraro Ph.D.
{"title":"A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete","authors":"Caitlin M. Tibbetts Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kyle A. Riding Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Christopher C. Ferraro Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2021.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Permeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs) are marketed as an option to improve the concrete durability and reduce water ingress in structures. Two categories of PRAs that have become more prominent recently are hydrophobic pore blockers and crystalline waterproofers. A literature review was performed to determine the composition, mechanism of action, test methods to indicate durability, and performance of PRAs in concrete, with focus on their use in infrastructure. The test methods for evaluating the performance of PRAs and their effects have varying degrees of frequency and standardization and there is a lack of consistency in the experimental methods used to evaluate PRAs based on the studies found in the literature; the dosage, water to cementitious ratio (w/cm), testing age, and mixture designs were variable. There remains a need for studies with both field and lab data to establish relationships between lab results and field performance to determine laboratory test method validity for PRAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922100013X/pdfft?md5=816ac328a40b46f0a41f222395fa4a55&pid=1-s2.0-S266654922100013X-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922100013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Permeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs) are marketed as an option to improve the concrete durability and reduce water ingress in structures. Two categories of PRAs that have become more prominent recently are hydrophobic pore blockers and crystalline waterproofers. A literature review was performed to determine the composition, mechanism of action, test methods to indicate durability, and performance of PRAs in concrete, with focus on their use in infrastructure. The test methods for evaluating the performance of PRAs and their effects have varying degrees of frequency and standardization and there is a lack of consistency in the experimental methods used to evaluate PRAs based on the studies found in the literature; the dosage, water to cementitious ratio (w/cm), testing age, and mixture designs were variable. There remains a need for studies with both field and lab data to establish relationships between lab results and field performance to determine laboratory test method validity for PRAs.

对混凝土中使用的降低渗透性外加剂的测试和效益的重要回顾
降低透水性外加剂(PRAs)作为提高混凝土耐久性和减少结构进水的一种选择而上市。最近,有两种类型的阻水性聚合物变得更加突出:疏水性孔阻滞剂和结晶防水剂。进行了文献综述,以确定其组成、作用机制、耐久性测试方法和在混凝土中的性能,重点是其在基础设施中的应用。评价公共服务质量及其效果的测试方法具有不同程度的频度和标准化,根据文献研究评价公共服务质量的实验方法缺乏一致性;剂量、水胶比(w/cm)、试验龄期和混合料设计是可变的。仍然需要对现场和实验室数据进行研究,以建立实验室结果与现场表现之间的关系,以确定实验室测试方法对pra的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信