Repensar los cuidados: de las prácticas a la ontopolítica

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
F. G. Selgas, María Teresa Martín Palomo
{"title":"Repensar los cuidados: de las prácticas a la ontopolítica","authors":"F. G. Selgas, María Teresa Martín Palomo","doi":"10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a theoretical review of the course followed by most of the main care researches, along with feminist claims of its centrality. We argue that it arrives at a concept of care as complex socio-practical processes which are fundamental for subjectivities, social consensus and the perpetuation of a common world. Thinking about interdependence in such practices, ‘ethics of care’ and the emergence of a post-humanist perspective, we are able to go, in a second movement, beyond that concept describing the specific logic of care practices as a tinkering logic and claiming for a transition from those ethics to an eventual ontology of “matters of care” which is inevitably political and changes our vision of ourselves and our placement in environment.","PeriodicalId":45827,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","volume":"78 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper is a theoretical review of the course followed by most of the main care researches, along with feminist claims of its centrality. We argue that it arrives at a concept of care as complex socio-practical processes which are fundamental for subjectivities, social consensus and the perpetuation of a common world. Thinking about interdependence in such practices, ‘ethics of care’ and the emergence of a post-humanist perspective, we are able to go, in a second movement, beyond that concept describing the specific logic of care practices as a tinkering logic and claiming for a transition from those ethics to an eventual ontology of “matters of care” which is inevitably political and changes our vision of ourselves and our placement in environment.
重新思考护理:从实践到本体政治
本文是对大多数主要护理研究所遵循的课程的理论回顾,以及女权主义者对其中心地位的主张。我们认为,它到达了一个概念的护理作为复杂的社会实践过程,这是基本的主体性,社会共识和共同世界的延续。考虑到这种实践中的相互依赖,“护理伦理”和后人文主义观点的出现,我们能够在第二个运动中超越这个概念,将护理实践的特定逻辑描述为修补逻辑,并声称从这些伦理过渡到最终的“护理事项”本体,这不可避免地是政治性的,改变了我们对自己和我们在环境中的位置的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信