An Evaluation of the Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test by VITEK MS and VITEK 2 Systems in Blood Culture

K. Park, Young-Bin Yu, Keun-Dol Yook, Sang-Ha Kim, Sunghyun Kim, Young Kwon Kim
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test by VITEK MS and VITEK 2 Systems in Blood Culture","authors":"K. Park, Young-Bin Yu, Keun-Dol Yook, Sang-Ha Kim, Sunghyun Kim, Young Kwon Kim","doi":"10.15324/KJCLS.2017.49.3.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) in blood cultures were obtained by inoculating the bacteria directly into the VITEK MS and the VITEK 2 systems without subculturing in the blood culture positive medium. The obtained results were compared with the results using a standard method to evaluate their reliability and accuracy. The direct AST results in blood culture positive specimens were 97.9% (1,936/1,978), consistent with the standard AST results. Gram-positive bacteria showed a concordance rate of 97.2% (1,051/1,081), a very major error rate of 0.5% (5/1,081), a major error rate of 0.1% (1/1,081), and a minor error rate of 2.2% (24/1,081). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the main cause of discordance, and gentamicin (N=9) and fusidic acid (N=8) showed high errors. The overall concordance rate and minor error among the Gram-negative bacteria were 98.6% (885/897) and 1.4% (12/897), respectively. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the major causative bacteria of Gram-negative bacteria. Among them, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (N=3) showed high error. Direct AST met the CLSI criteria and shortened the reporting time by 24 hours; however, we found that there was a need to perform an addition test via disk diffusion for antimicrobials with very large errors. These results suggest that the method of direct AST in blood culture positive medium may be very useful in efficiently treating patients.","PeriodicalId":10080,"journal":{"name":"临床检验杂志","volume":"19 Suppl 1 1","pages":"279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床检验杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15324/KJCLS.2017.49.3.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The results of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) in blood cultures were obtained by inoculating the bacteria directly into the VITEK MS and the VITEK 2 systems without subculturing in the blood culture positive medium. The obtained results were compared with the results using a standard method to evaluate their reliability and accuracy. The direct AST results in blood culture positive specimens were 97.9% (1,936/1,978), consistent with the standard AST results. Gram-positive bacteria showed a concordance rate of 97.2% (1,051/1,081), a very major error rate of 0.5% (5/1,081), a major error rate of 0.1% (1/1,081), and a minor error rate of 2.2% (24/1,081). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the main cause of discordance, and gentamicin (N=9) and fusidic acid (N=8) showed high errors. The overall concordance rate and minor error among the Gram-negative bacteria were 98.6% (885/897) and 1.4% (12/897), respectively. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the major causative bacteria of Gram-negative bacteria. Among them, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (N=3) showed high error. Direct AST met the CLSI criteria and shortened the reporting time by 24 hours; however, we found that there was a need to perform an addition test via disk diffusion for antimicrobials with very large errors. These results suggest that the method of direct AST in blood culture positive medium may be very useful in efficiently treating patients.
VITEK MS和VITEK 2系统血培养快速药敏试验的评价
将细菌直接接种于VITEK MS和VITEK 2系统中,无需在血培养阳性培养基中进行传代培养,获得血培养物快速抗菌药敏试验(AST)结果。将所得结果与标准方法的结果进行比较,评价其可靠性和准确性。血培养阳性标本AST直接结果为97.9%(1936 / 1978),与AST标准结果一致。革兰氏阳性菌的符合率为97.2%(1051 / 1081),极严重错误率为0.5%(5/ 1081),严重错误率为0.1%(1/ 1081),轻微错误率为2.2%(24/ 1081)。表皮葡萄球菌是导致不一致的主要原因,庆大霉素(N=9)和夫西地酸(N=8)的误差较高。革兰氏阴性菌总体符合率为98.6%(885/897),轻微错误率为1.4%(12/897)。革兰氏阴性菌的主要病原菌为大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。其中阿莫西林/克拉维酸(N=3)误差较高。直接AST符合CLSI标准,报告时间缩短24小时;然而,我们发现有必要通过磁盘扩散对具有非常大误差的抗菌剂进行额外测试。这些结果提示,在血培养阳性培养基中直接应用谷草转氨酶可能是一种有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10649
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信