Clinical studies of radiation effects in man: a preliminary report of a retrospective search for dose-relationships in the prodromal syndrome.

Lushbaugh Cc, F. Comas, Ruth B. Hofstra
{"title":"Clinical studies of radiation effects in man: a preliminary report of a retrospective search for dose-relationships in the prodromal syndrome.","authors":"Lushbaugh Cc, F. Comas, Ruth B. Hofstra","doi":"10.2307/3583733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of total-body irradiation on man have been studied clinically since Walsh (1) first described \"radiation sickness\" in 1897. Thus it is well-known that exposure to ionizing radiations can result in a delayed illness that may prevent a man from working. The dose-response relationships are poorly known (2, 3), however, and present estimates are based largely on conjectures derived by extrapolation from animal experiments (3) or from experience with radiation accident victims (4-9), atomic bomb casualties (3, 10-12) and therapeutically irradiated patients (1-3, 13-17). Because these estimates are all we have, it has been necessary to use them in the past for guidance in civilian defense, radiotherapy, and occupational medicine. They are not, however, sufficiently accurate for prediction of the probability that sublethal doses of radiation will cause deleterious functional effects that could lead to sudden or delayed decrements in performance capabilities (2). In developing the estimated residual dose (ERD) concept on which most occupational and civilian defense medical plans are based today (18-20), the ERD Committee did not consider a form of radiation sickness so mild that medical care was not required but severe enough to cause performance failure that could result in death. The Committee's conclusion, that 9 out of 10 persons exposed to less than","PeriodicalId":77888,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research. Supplement","volume":"164 1","pages":"398-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation research. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3583733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The effects of total-body irradiation on man have been studied clinically since Walsh (1) first described "radiation sickness" in 1897. Thus it is well-known that exposure to ionizing radiations can result in a delayed illness that may prevent a man from working. The dose-response relationships are poorly known (2, 3), however, and present estimates are based largely on conjectures derived by extrapolation from animal experiments (3) or from experience with radiation accident victims (4-9), atomic bomb casualties (3, 10-12) and therapeutically irradiated patients (1-3, 13-17). Because these estimates are all we have, it has been necessary to use them in the past for guidance in civilian defense, radiotherapy, and occupational medicine. They are not, however, sufficiently accurate for prediction of the probability that sublethal doses of radiation will cause deleterious functional effects that could lead to sudden or delayed decrements in performance capabilities (2). In developing the estimated residual dose (ERD) concept on which most occupational and civilian defense medical plans are based today (18-20), the ERD Committee did not consider a form of radiation sickness so mild that medical care was not required but severe enough to cause performance failure that could result in death. The Committee's conclusion, that 9 out of 10 persons exposed to less than
人体辐射效应的临床研究:前驱综合征剂量关系回顾性研究的初步报告。
自1897年Walsh(1)首次描述“辐射病”以来,对人体全身照射的影响进行了临床研究。因此,众所周知,暴露在电离辐射下可导致迟发性疾病,这可能使人无法工作。然而,剂量-反应关系所知甚少(2,3),目前的估计主要基于从动物实验(3)或从辐射事故受害者(4-9)、原子弹伤亡(3,10 -12)和接受治疗的患者(1- 3,13 -17)的经验推断得出的猜想。因为这些估计是我们所拥有的全部,所以在过去有必要使用它们来指导民用防御、放射治疗和职业医学。然而,它们在预测亚致死剂量辐射将造成可能导致工作能力突然或延迟下降的有害功能影响的可能性方面不够准确(2)。在制定目前大多数职业和民用防御医疗计划所依据的估计残余剂量概念时(18-20),辐射灾害委员会没有考虑到一种不需要医疗护理的轻微辐射病,但严重到足以导致工作能力下降并可能导致死亡。委员会的结论是,10个人中有9个人接触不到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信