Towards a Theory of Performance Reception

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
E. Hall
{"title":"Towards a Theory of Performance Reception","authors":"E. Hall","doi":"10.5040/9781472540430.ch-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"theoretical issues facing the classicist who wants to study the ways in which ancient Greece and Rome have been \"re ceived\" in performed media. It attempts to identify an intel lectual ancestry for this type of scholarship, above all in schools of aesthetics deriving from German idealism, and thereby to define what it is about performance arts that makes the study of the ways they use Greek and Roman an tiquity different from Reception in non-performed arts. Since this inquiry addresses cultural phenomena extending from the Renaissance to the twenty-first century, it does not engage with the scholarly controversy surrounding the legit imacy of the concept of performance in relation to the an cient world, which knew neither the term nor the category it denotes.1 While acknowledging that performance is a concept with its own (relatively recent) historical specificity, the discussion nevertheless assumes a commonsense defini tion of the word performance as it is used in our own time: to say that something from ancient Greece or Rome has been performed implies an aesthetic phenomenon in which humans have realized an archetypal text, narrative or idea by acting, puppet manipulation, dance, recital, or song; the category Performance Reception therefore excludes individ uals reading a text to themselves, or the visual arts (except, hypothetically, when they are of a type requiring the label performance art).","PeriodicalId":39571,"journal":{"name":"ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS","volume":"30 1 1","pages":"51-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472540430.ch-002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

theoretical issues facing the classicist who wants to study the ways in which ancient Greece and Rome have been "re ceived" in performed media. It attempts to identify an intel lectual ancestry for this type of scholarship, above all in schools of aesthetics deriving from German idealism, and thereby to define what it is about performance arts that makes the study of the ways they use Greek and Roman an tiquity different from Reception in non-performed arts. Since this inquiry addresses cultural phenomena extending from the Renaissance to the twenty-first century, it does not engage with the scholarly controversy surrounding the legit imacy of the concept of performance in relation to the an cient world, which knew neither the term nor the category it denotes.1 While acknowledging that performance is a concept with its own (relatively recent) historical specificity, the discussion nevertheless assumes a commonsense defini tion of the word performance as it is used in our own time: to say that something from ancient Greece or Rome has been performed implies an aesthetic phenomenon in which humans have realized an archetypal text, narrative or idea by acting, puppet manipulation, dance, recital, or song; the category Performance Reception therefore excludes individ uals reading a text to themselves, or the visual arts (except, hypothetically, when they are of a type requiring the label performance art).
表演接受理论初探
古典主义者在研究古希腊和古罗马在表演媒体中被“接受”的方式时所面临的理论问题。它试图确定这类学术的智力祖先,首先是源于德国唯心主义的美学流派,从而定义表演艺术是什么,使他们使用希腊和罗马文化的方式的研究不同于非表演艺术中的接受。由于本研究涉及从文艺复兴时期延伸到21世纪的文化现象,因此它不涉及围绕与古代世界有关的表演概念的合法性的学术争议,古代世界既不知道这个术语,也不知道它所表示的类别虽然承认表演是一个具有自身(相对较近)历史特殊性的概念,但讨论仍然假设了表演一词的常识性定义,因为它在我们自己的时代被使用:说古希腊或罗马的某些东西已经被表演,意味着一种审美现象,在这种现象中,人类通过表演、木偶操纵、舞蹈、朗诵或歌曲实现了原型文本、叙事或想法;因此,“表演接受”这一范畴排除了个人为自己阅读文本或视觉艺术(除非,假设,当它们属于需要贴上“表演艺术”标签的类型时)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: MORE THAN humane philology is essential for keeping the classics as a living force. Arion therefore exists to publish work that needs to be done and that otherwise might not get done. We want to stimulate, provoke, even "plant" work that now finds no encouragement or congenial home elsewhere. This means swimming against the mainstream, resisting the extremes of conventional philology and critical fashion into which the profession is now polarized. But occupying this vital center should in no way preclude the crucial centrifugal movement that may lead us across disciplinary lines and beyond the academy. Our commitment is to a genuine and generous pluralism that opens up rather than polarizes classical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信