Сhildfree in the Focus of Qualitative Sociological Research

IF 0.1 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
O. Zubariev
{"title":"Сhildfree in the Focus of Qualitative Sociological Research","authors":"O. Zubariev","doi":"10.26565/2227-6521-2021-47-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problematics of childfree in sociological discourse. It is noted that the concept of \"childfree\" appears in the context of rethinking the prevailing public discourse about childlessness. If the concept of “childless” refers to people who are childless for reasons beyond their control, then the concept of “childfree” refers to people who are childless because they themselves made such a choice. Attention is focused on the insufficient development of this issue in modern Ukrainian sociology. A review of sociological studies of the childfree phenomenon, implemented using qualitative methods, is carried out. In particular, the work of the British sociologist Josephine Davies, devoted to the question of how women who choose not to be mothers experience the period from 45 to 55; the study by J. Veevers, who singles out \"early articulators\", \"postponers\", \"aficionados\" and \"rejectors\" among the childfree; E. Campbell, who shows that sometimes the nature of the relationship between a woman and her mother can influence a woman's choice to be a childfree in the future; R. Gillespie, who studies in detail the formation of the identity of chіldfree women; P. Bonnici, who studies the impact of voluntary childlessness on a woman's identity; K. Park, which reveals the strategies of stigma management that use childfree; A. Campbell, who studies the social perception of women who have chosen sterilization as a permanent form of contraception. The opinion is expressed that the phenomenon of childfree can be considered in the context of \"aesthetics of existence\" or \"self-technique\" (M. Foucault), because the question of whether or not to have children is not subject to strict moral prohibitions, but rather intense moral issues. If voluntary childlessness is a form of stylization of life, then, accordingly, it can be analyzed in such aspects as: determination of ethical substance, way of self-subordination, form of ethical work and teleology of the moral subject.","PeriodicalId":53765,"journal":{"name":"Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2021-47-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the problematics of childfree in sociological discourse. It is noted that the concept of "childfree" appears in the context of rethinking the prevailing public discourse about childlessness. If the concept of “childless” refers to people who are childless for reasons beyond their control, then the concept of “childfree” refers to people who are childless because they themselves made such a choice. Attention is focused on the insufficient development of this issue in modern Ukrainian sociology. A review of sociological studies of the childfree phenomenon, implemented using qualitative methods, is carried out. In particular, the work of the British sociologist Josephine Davies, devoted to the question of how women who choose not to be mothers experience the period from 45 to 55; the study by J. Veevers, who singles out "early articulators", "postponers", "aficionados" and "rejectors" among the childfree; E. Campbell, who shows that sometimes the nature of the relationship between a woman and her mother can influence a woman's choice to be a childfree in the future; R. Gillespie, who studies in detail the formation of the identity of chіldfree women; P. Bonnici, who studies the impact of voluntary childlessness on a woman's identity; K. Park, which reveals the strategies of stigma management that use childfree; A. Campbell, who studies the social perception of women who have chosen sterilization as a permanent form of contraception. The opinion is expressed that the phenomenon of childfree can be considered in the context of "aesthetics of existence" or "self-technique" (M. Foucault), because the question of whether or not to have children is not subject to strict moral prohibitions, but rather intense moral issues. If voluntary childlessness is a form of stylization of life, then, accordingly, it can be analyzed in such aspects as: determination of ethical substance, way of self-subordination, form of ethical work and teleology of the moral subject.
Сhildfree在定性社会学研究的焦点
本文论述了社会学话语中的无子女问题。人们注意到,“无子女”的概念是在重新思考关于无子女的普遍公共话语的背景下出现的。如果“无子女”的概念是指那些因为自己无法控制的原因而没有孩子的人,那么“无子女”的概念是指那些因为自己做出了这样的选择而没有孩子的人。现代乌克兰社会学对这一问题的研究不够充分,引起了人们的关注。对使用定性方法实施的无子女现象的社会学研究进行了回顾。尤其是英国社会学家约瑟芬·戴维斯(Josephine Davies)的作品,她致力于研究那些选择不做母亲的女性如何经历45岁到55岁这段时间;j·维弗斯(J. Veevers)的研究,他在没有孩子的人中挑出了“早期发音者”、“推迟者”、“狂热者”和“拒绝者”;坎贝尔(E. Campbell)的研究表明,有时女性与母亲之间关系的性质会影响女性未来不生育的选择;R. Gillespie,他详细研究了无氯女性身份的形成;P. Bonnici,研究自愿不生育对女性身份认同的影响;K. Park,揭示了使用无子女的耻辱管理策略;坎贝尔(a . Campbell)研究社会对选择绝育作为永久避孕方式的女性的看法。有观点认为,无子女现象可以放在“存在美学”或“自我技术”(福柯)的语境中考虑,因为是否要孩子的问题不是严格的道德禁忌,而是激烈的道德问题。如果自愿无子女是一种生活的程式化形式,那么,相应地,它可以从以下几个方面进行分析:伦理实质的确定、自我服从的方式、伦理工作的形式和道德主体的目的论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies
Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信