Education Leadership Students’ Reflections on a Conference Course

Q2 Social Sciences
Ayodele Bain, Maysaa Barakat, Francine Baugh, D. Pappas, Leila H. Shatara, Mary Wilson
{"title":"Education Leadership Students’ Reflections on a Conference Course","authors":"Ayodele Bain, Maysaa Barakat, Francine Baugh, D. Pappas, Leila H. Shatara, Mary Wilson","doi":"10.28945/4458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this case study is to describe the experiences of educational leadership doctoral students when taking a conference course for the fulfillment of their program’s experiential learning requirements. The research explains how the course added to students’ understanding of educational research and development as research scholars.\n\nBackground: Research on doctoral student learning experiences in the contexts of professional conferences is limited. The present research examines a unique group context and the perceptions of doctoral student learning and development through the lens of adult learning theory. \n\nMethodology: This basic qualitative case study includes doctoral student perspectives on their learning and development as a result of participation in a professional educational leadership conference as course experience. Researchers conducted a review of literature, engaged with participants in a focus group style debriefing, and completed a document analysis of participants’ written reflections following a multi-day conference. \n\nContribution: The present research contributes to the field of educational leadership research by providing first-hand accounts of participation in a conference as course experience to promote student learning and development as research scholars. \n\nFindings: Findings suggest that participant learning experiences varied when analyzed through the lens of adult learning theory and are categorized into three types of learning that include non-learning, non-reflective learning, and reflective learning. In addition, participants’ development as research scholars is reported to be influenced by the conference and course design elements that promoted relative autonomy, embedded reflection, and interpersonal support. \n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: The present research has implications for both doctoral program design and professional conference planning. Experiential learning activities that extend beyond classrooms present students with opportunities for learning and socialization into a field of study. \n\nRecommendation for Researchers: The paper informs and challenges researchers to focus on the experiences of conference attendees and highlights a need for a more nuanced evaluation of conference courses. \n\nImpact on Society: Professional conferences present opportunities for doctoral students to develop as research scholars that ask questions to address societal problems. The following research suggests that conference learning experiences may be enhanced through an experiential course design and principles of relative autonomy, incorporation of reflection, and embedded interaction.\n\nFuture Research: In the future, research of doctoral student learning at conferences may consider applying other methodologies (e.g., narrative research, quantitative) and consider the inclusion of student outcome variables like doctoral student motivation, interests, and social and emotional learning. \n\n","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this case study is to describe the experiences of educational leadership doctoral students when taking a conference course for the fulfillment of their program’s experiential learning requirements. The research explains how the course added to students’ understanding of educational research and development as research scholars. Background: Research on doctoral student learning experiences in the contexts of professional conferences is limited. The present research examines a unique group context and the perceptions of doctoral student learning and development through the lens of adult learning theory. Methodology: This basic qualitative case study includes doctoral student perspectives on their learning and development as a result of participation in a professional educational leadership conference as course experience. Researchers conducted a review of literature, engaged with participants in a focus group style debriefing, and completed a document analysis of participants’ written reflections following a multi-day conference. Contribution: The present research contributes to the field of educational leadership research by providing first-hand accounts of participation in a conference as course experience to promote student learning and development as research scholars. Findings: Findings suggest that participant learning experiences varied when analyzed through the lens of adult learning theory and are categorized into three types of learning that include non-learning, non-reflective learning, and reflective learning. In addition, participants’ development as research scholars is reported to be influenced by the conference and course design elements that promoted relative autonomy, embedded reflection, and interpersonal support. Recommendations for Practitioners: The present research has implications for both doctoral program design and professional conference planning. Experiential learning activities that extend beyond classrooms present students with opportunities for learning and socialization into a field of study. Recommendation for Researchers: The paper informs and challenges researchers to focus on the experiences of conference attendees and highlights a need for a more nuanced evaluation of conference courses. Impact on Society: Professional conferences present opportunities for doctoral students to develop as research scholars that ask questions to address societal problems. The following research suggests that conference learning experiences may be enhanced through an experiential course design and principles of relative autonomy, incorporation of reflection, and embedded interaction. Future Research: In the future, research of doctoral student learning at conferences may consider applying other methodologies (e.g., narrative research, quantitative) and consider the inclusion of student outcome variables like doctoral student motivation, interests, and social and emotional learning.
教育领导学生对会议课程的思考
目的/目的:本案例研究的目的是描述教育领导力博士生在参加会议课程以实现其项目的体验式学习要求时的经历。该研究解释了该课程如何增加了学生作为研究学者对教育研究与发展的理解。背景:在专业会议背景下对博士生学习经历的研究是有限的。本研究通过成人学习理论的视角考察了一个独特的群体背景和博士生的学习与发展观念。方法:这个基本的定性案例研究包括博士生对他们的学习和发展的观点,作为参加专业教育领导会议的课程经验。研究人员对文献进行了回顾,与参与者进行了焦点小组式的汇报,并对参与者在为期数天的会议后的书面反思进行了文件分析。贡献:本研究为教育领导研究领域做出了贡献,提供了参与会议作为课程经验的第一手资料,以促进学生作为研究学者的学习和发展。研究结果:研究结果表明,通过成人学习理论的视角分析,参与者的学习经历各不相同,并将其分为三种学习类型,包括非学习、非反思学习和反思学习。此外,据报道,参与者作为研究学者的发展受到会议和课程设计元素的影响,这些元素促进了相对自主性、嵌入式反思和人际支持。对从业者的建议:本研究对博士课程设计和专业会议规划都有启示。超越课堂的体验式学习活动为学生提供了学习和社交的机会。给研究人员的建议:这篇论文提醒和挑战研究人员关注会议与会者的经验,并强调需要对会议课程进行更细致入微的评估。对社会的影响:专业会议为博士生提供了发展为研究学者的机会,他们提出问题来解决社会问题。以下研究表明,会议学习体验可以通过体验式课程设计和相对自主原则、反思的结合以及嵌入式互动来增强。未来研究:在未来,关于博士生在会议上学习的研究可能会考虑应用其他方法(例如,叙事研究,定量研究),并考虑包括学生的结果变量,如博士生的动机,兴趣,以及社会和情感学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信