Ethical Challenges at the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic – A Systematic Review

P. Thangaraju, Hemasri Velmurugan
{"title":"Ethical Challenges at the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic – A Systematic Review","authors":"P. Thangaraju, Hemasri Velmurugan","doi":"10.2174/2666796704666230815142955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented influx of patients in hospitals, raising ethical concerns not just about triage and life-support decisions but also about family visits and the quality of end-of-life care. The value of ethics in the public healthcare system cannot be overstated; nonetheless, the ethics-related problems (or issues) identified during this epidemic have been linked to a lack of accountability, resource allocation challenges, and a loss of trust in healthcare providers. These elements have the ability to shake our ethical ideas, exacerbate ethical dilemmas, and put carers in dangerous situations.\n\n\n\nTo determine the prevalence and distribution of ethical principles in COVID-19-related research publications.\n\n\n\nThe keywords were used to check the articles published on ethics-related problems at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, published between January 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022. Secondly, we aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of these ethical principles in research publications related to COVID-19.\n\n\n\nA total of 6152 articles were identified; 2816 were included for abstract and title screening. Of the 159 articles, 134 were excluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The remaining 25 articles were scrutinised extensively. There were 17 (68%) literature reviews, 5 (20%) systematic reviews, 1 (4%) integrative review, 1 (4%) cross-sectional study, and 1 (4%) observational study.\n\n\n\nIt is evident from the multitude of papers on the issue that medical ethical challenges, as well as ethical discussions and debates, continue to develop virtually every day. We attempted to portray the COVID-19 whirlpool, encompassing the scope, nature, and urgency of the issues that developed in a highly charged political atmosphere. There have been efforts to use ethical considerations to justify triage procedures. An imbalance between utilitarian and individual ethics, regardless of perspective, leads to insoluble discomforts that carers must overcome.\n","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"29 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666796704666230815142955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented influx of patients in hospitals, raising ethical concerns not just about triage and life-support decisions but also about family visits and the quality of end-of-life care. The value of ethics in the public healthcare system cannot be overstated; nonetheless, the ethics-related problems (or issues) identified during this epidemic have been linked to a lack of accountability, resource allocation challenges, and a loss of trust in healthcare providers. These elements have the ability to shake our ethical ideas, exacerbate ethical dilemmas, and put carers in dangerous situations. To determine the prevalence and distribution of ethical principles in COVID-19-related research publications. The keywords were used to check the articles published on ethics-related problems at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, published between January 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022. Secondly, we aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of these ethical principles in research publications related to COVID-19. A total of 6152 articles were identified; 2816 were included for abstract and title screening. Of the 159 articles, 134 were excluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The remaining 25 articles were scrutinised extensively. There were 17 (68%) literature reviews, 5 (20%) systematic reviews, 1 (4%) integrative review, 1 (4%) cross-sectional study, and 1 (4%) observational study. It is evident from the multitude of papers on the issue that medical ethical challenges, as well as ethical discussions and debates, continue to develop virtually every day. We attempted to portray the COVID-19 whirlpool, encompassing the scope, nature, and urgency of the issues that developed in a highly charged political atmosphere. There have been efforts to use ethical considerations to justify triage procedures. An imbalance between utilitarian and individual ethics, regardless of perspective, leads to insoluble discomforts that carers must overcome.
2019冠状病毒病大流行时期的伦理挑战——系统回顾
全球COVID-19大流行导致医院患者前所未有地涌入,不仅引发了对分诊和生命支持决定的伦理担忧,还引发了对家庭探视和临终关怀质量的伦理担忧。伦理在公共医疗体系中的价值怎么强调都不为过;尽管如此,在这次流行病期间发现的与道德有关的问题(或问题)与缺乏问责制、资源分配挑战以及对医疗保健提供者失去信任有关。这些因素有能力动摇我们的道德观念,加剧道德困境,并将护理人员置于危险的境地。确定伦理原则在covid -19相关研究出版物中的流行程度和分布情况。这些关键词用于检查2021年1月1日至2022年8月31日期间发表的关于新冠肺炎大流行时期伦理学相关问题的文章。其次,我们的目的是确定这些伦理原则在与COVID-19相关的研究出版物中的流行程度和分布。共鉴定出6152件物品;2816份纳入摘要和标题筛选。在159篇文章中,根据纳入和排除标准,134篇文章被排除在外。其余25篇文章经过了广泛审查。文献综述17篇(68%),系统综述5篇(20%),综合综述1篇(4%),横断面研究1篇(4%),观察性研究1篇(4%)。从大量关于这一问题的论文中可以明显看出,医学伦理挑战以及伦理讨论和辩论几乎每天都在继续发展。我们试图描绘COVID-19的漩涡,包括在高度紧张的政治气氛中发展起来的问题的范围、性质和紧迫性。人们一直在努力用伦理考虑来证明分诊程序的合理性。功利主义和个人道德之间的不平衡,无论从哪个角度来看,都会导致照顾者必须克服的无法解决的不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信