A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Different Functional Treatments for Acute Ankle Sprains

S. L. Kyaw, I. Moore, Min Lwin Oo
{"title":"A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Different Functional Treatments for Acute Ankle Sprains","authors":"S. L. Kyaw, I. Moore, Min Lwin Oo","doi":"10.4172/2161-0673.1000213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An ankle sprain is a very common sport-related injury and can reduce participation in sports and employment. It can also create further complications in the function of the joint. \nPurpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of different functional treatments and to ascertain which functional treatment is the most effective method for acute ankle sprains. \nStudy Design: Systematic review. \nMethods: The design of this systematic review was developed in accordance with PRISMA-P 2015 statement and performed according to its guidelines. A computerized literature search was performed from PubMed Central, MEDLINE via OVID and Cochrane library. Randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies, published within a ten-year period (2007 to 2017), in peer-reviewed journals, with full-text articles and written in English were included in this study. Any type of functional treatments being applied to treat acute ankle sprains were considered as an intervention and only adult participants were included in this review. Surgical methods, unpublished trials, not written in the English language or not experimental research were excluded. \nResults: From the pooled data of this review, the stocking was more effective at improving pain, swelling, functional outcomes, range of motion, and return to sport/work, and had higher patient satisfaction than the bandage. There was no evidence that the taping and lace-up brace were more effective than other functional interventions in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. Furthermore, the prevalence of complications was greatest for the taping and lace-up brace interventions. The semi-rigid or posterior rigid support group had a better functional recovery and higher patient satisfaction, but some complications were present. \nConclusion: The semi-rigid or posterior rigid support group and stocking were the most effective functional interventions for acute ankle sprain treatment. \nWhat is known about this subject: The functional treatments are becoming popular due to being effective, inexpensive and simplistic to apply. Different types of functional interventions have been used according to the choice of clinicians and patients in the treatment of ankle sprains. According to the previous researches, semi-rigid support, ankle braces, bandage and lace-up supports have greater advantages than other functional treatments from different perspectives (Example. the elastic bandage had a slower recovery rate than semi-rigid brace but less complications than taping, the lace-up support was better in swelling management than other functional treatments). \nWhat this study adds to existing knowledge: This study found that the stocking is an effective treatment for managing acute ankle sprains. It is valuable for the patient because the cost of the stocking is considerably cheaper than other functional treatments and it is very easy to wear. Some popular functional treatments like lace-up support; taping and semi-rigid braces were shown to have some complications.","PeriodicalId":17085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0673.1000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An ankle sprain is a very common sport-related injury and can reduce participation in sports and employment. It can also create further complications in the function of the joint. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of different functional treatments and to ascertain which functional treatment is the most effective method for acute ankle sprains. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: The design of this systematic review was developed in accordance with PRISMA-P 2015 statement and performed according to its guidelines. A computerized literature search was performed from PubMed Central, MEDLINE via OVID and Cochrane library. Randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies, published within a ten-year period (2007 to 2017), in peer-reviewed journals, with full-text articles and written in English were included in this study. Any type of functional treatments being applied to treat acute ankle sprains were considered as an intervention and only adult participants were included in this review. Surgical methods, unpublished trials, not written in the English language or not experimental research were excluded. Results: From the pooled data of this review, the stocking was more effective at improving pain, swelling, functional outcomes, range of motion, and return to sport/work, and had higher patient satisfaction than the bandage. There was no evidence that the taping and lace-up brace were more effective than other functional interventions in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. Furthermore, the prevalence of complications was greatest for the taping and lace-up brace interventions. The semi-rigid or posterior rigid support group had a better functional recovery and higher patient satisfaction, but some complications were present. Conclusion: The semi-rigid or posterior rigid support group and stocking were the most effective functional interventions for acute ankle sprain treatment. What is known about this subject: The functional treatments are becoming popular due to being effective, inexpensive and simplistic to apply. Different types of functional interventions have been used according to the choice of clinicians and patients in the treatment of ankle sprains. According to the previous researches, semi-rigid support, ankle braces, bandage and lace-up supports have greater advantages than other functional treatments from different perspectives (Example. the elastic bandage had a slower recovery rate than semi-rigid brace but less complications than taping, the lace-up support was better in swelling management than other functional treatments). What this study adds to existing knowledge: This study found that the stocking is an effective treatment for managing acute ankle sprains. It is valuable for the patient because the cost of the stocking is considerably cheaper than other functional treatments and it is very easy to wear. Some popular functional treatments like lace-up support; taping and semi-rigid braces were shown to have some complications.
不同功能治疗急性踝关节扭伤疗效的系统评价
背景:踝关节扭伤是一种非常常见的运动相关损伤,可以减少运动和就业的参与。它还会对关节功能造成进一步的并发症。目的:评价不同功能治疗的疗效,确定哪种功能治疗是治疗急性踝关节扭伤最有效的方法。研究设计:系统评价。方法:本系统评价的设计按照PRISMA-P 2015标准进行,并按照其指南进行。计算机检索PubMed Central、MEDLINE、OVID和Cochrane图书馆的文献。本研究纳入了十年内(2007年至2017年)发表在同行评议期刊上的随机对照试验或准实验研究,并附有全文文章,以英文撰写。用于治疗急性踝关节扭伤的任何类型的功能治疗都被认为是一种干预措施,并且只有成人参与者被纳入本综述。排除手术方法、未发表的试验、非英文文献或非实验性研究。结果:从本综述的汇总数据来看,长袜在改善疼痛、肿胀、功能结局、活动范围和恢复运动/工作方面更有效,并且患者满意度高于绷带。没有证据表明在治疗急性踝关节扭伤时,绑带和绑带支架比其他功能干预更有效。此外,并发症的流行率是最大的胶带和绑带支架干预。半刚性或后刚性支持组功能恢复较好,患者满意度较高,但存在并发症。结论:半刚性或后刚性支撑组和长袜是治疗急性踝关节扭伤最有效的功能干预措施。关于这一主题的了解:功能性治疗因其有效、廉价和简单而越来越受欢迎。根据临床医生和患者的选择,在治疗踝关节扭伤时采用了不同类型的功能干预措施。根据以往的研究,从不同的角度来看,半刚性支撑、踝关节支架、绷带和绑带支撑都比其他功能治疗有更大的优势。弹性绷带的恢复速度比半刚性支架慢,但并发症比胶布少,绑带支架在肿胀管理方面优于其他功能治疗)。这项研究对现有知识的补充:这项研究发现,长袜是治疗急性踝关节扭伤的有效方法。这对病人来说很有价值,因为袜子的费用比其他功能性治疗要便宜得多,而且很容易穿。一些流行的功能性治疗方法,如绑带支撑;胶带和半刚性支具显示有一些并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信