Pulmonary embolism: options for interventional treatment in the intermediate-high risk group

Q4 Medicine
S. I. Parkhomenko, K. B. Lapshin, T. Glebovskaya, K. Malikov, N. Marukyan, D. D. Zubarev, D. Alekseeva, O. Moiseeva, M. Simakova
{"title":"Pulmonary embolism: options for interventional treatment in the intermediate-high risk group","authors":"S. I. Parkhomenko, K. B. Lapshin, T. Glebovskaya, K. Malikov, N. Marukyan, D. D. Zubarev, D. Alekseeva, O. Moiseeva, M. Simakova","doi":"10.18705/1607-419x-2023-29-3-306-319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selective transcatheter thrombolysis (STT) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) with an intermediatehigh risk of 30-day mortality is an option for rapid lung reperfusion with a decrease in right ventricular (RV) afterload, which largely determines the prognosis of patients.Objective. Comparison of the efficacy of STT using reduced doses of alteplase and routine conservative treatment of patients with PE with an intermediate-high risk of 30-day mortality using a retrospective analysis of the data from Almazov National Medical Research Centre.Design and methods. The retrospective single-center study included 45 patients (18 men (40 %) and 27 women (60 %)) admitted to the anaesthesiology and resuscitation department of the Almazov National Medical Research Centre from January 1, 2021 to May 1, 2022 with the confirmed diagnosis of acute PE. Intermediate-high risk patients (22 people (57,9 %)) were divided into two groups according to the treatment strategy: the group receiving standard anticoagulant therapy (n = 15 (68,2 %)) and the group with STT by alteplase at a total dose of 50 mg (n = 7 (31,8 %)). In order to assess the effectiveness of treatment, the main laboratory and instrumental indicators were compared based on data from the medical information system.Results. Baseline clinical characteristics of the compared groups did not differ. Systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery (SPPA) in the transcatheter treatment group decreased from 59 [50; 82] to 35 [30; 65] mmHg; in the conservative treatment group: from 65 [50; 70] to 52 [40; 59] mmHg. In the selective thrombolysis group, there was a significant trend for a greater decrease SPPA compared to the anticoagulant therapy group: –25 [–29; –3] versus — 10 [–23; –6] mmHg, р = 0,047. There was a significant change in the level of leukocytes and platelets in the group of transcatheter treatment versus anticoagulant therapy: –5,0 [6,1; 4,1] × 109/l vs –2,8 [4,3; 1,8] × 109/l (p = 0,017) and 130 [32; 181] × 1012/l vs 31 [2; 56] × 1012/l (р = 0,044). There were no significant differences in the change in the RV size between the groups. The groups did not differ in the total number of hemorrhagic complications. When bleeding was divided by severity (according to the TIMI classification), moderate bleeding was more common in the selective thrombolysis group (2 cases versus 0 with a conservative approach, p = 0,014). There were no differences in the duration of treatment in the anaesthesiology and resuscitation department and the terms of inpatient treatment.Conclusions. A single center retrospective study demonstrated the high quality of approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of PE in terms of current guidelines. The STT with reduced doses of alteplase was associated with a more significant decrease SPPA and normalization of hemogram parameters when compared to the standard treatment approach. At the same time, selective thrombolysis was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. A prospective study of the efficacy and safety of prolonged STT with the selection of the dose of thrombolytic in patients with PE with an intermediate-high risk of 30-day mortality is needed.","PeriodicalId":37695,"journal":{"name":"Arterial Hypertension (Russian Federation)","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arterial Hypertension (Russian Federation)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419x-2023-29-3-306-319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selective transcatheter thrombolysis (STT) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) with an intermediatehigh risk of 30-day mortality is an option for rapid lung reperfusion with a decrease in right ventricular (RV) afterload, which largely determines the prognosis of patients.Objective. Comparison of the efficacy of STT using reduced doses of alteplase and routine conservative treatment of patients with PE with an intermediate-high risk of 30-day mortality using a retrospective analysis of the data from Almazov National Medical Research Centre.Design and methods. The retrospective single-center study included 45 patients (18 men (40 %) and 27 women (60 %)) admitted to the anaesthesiology and resuscitation department of the Almazov National Medical Research Centre from January 1, 2021 to May 1, 2022 with the confirmed diagnosis of acute PE. Intermediate-high risk patients (22 people (57,9 %)) were divided into two groups according to the treatment strategy: the group receiving standard anticoagulant therapy (n = 15 (68,2 %)) and the group with STT by alteplase at a total dose of 50 mg (n = 7 (31,8 %)). In order to assess the effectiveness of treatment, the main laboratory and instrumental indicators were compared based on data from the medical information system.Results. Baseline clinical characteristics of the compared groups did not differ. Systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery (SPPA) in the transcatheter treatment group decreased from 59 [50; 82] to 35 [30; 65] mmHg; in the conservative treatment group: from 65 [50; 70] to 52 [40; 59] mmHg. In the selective thrombolysis group, there was a significant trend for a greater decrease SPPA compared to the anticoagulant therapy group: –25 [–29; –3] versus — 10 [–23; –6] mmHg, р = 0,047. There was a significant change in the level of leukocytes and platelets in the group of transcatheter treatment versus anticoagulant therapy: –5,0 [6,1; 4,1] × 109/l vs –2,8 [4,3; 1,8] × 109/l (p = 0,017) and 130 [32; 181] × 1012/l vs 31 [2; 56] × 1012/l (р = 0,044). There were no significant differences in the change in the RV size between the groups. The groups did not differ in the total number of hemorrhagic complications. When bleeding was divided by severity (according to the TIMI classification), moderate bleeding was more common in the selective thrombolysis group (2 cases versus 0 with a conservative approach, p = 0,014). There were no differences in the duration of treatment in the anaesthesiology and resuscitation department and the terms of inpatient treatment.Conclusions. A single center retrospective study demonstrated the high quality of approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of PE in terms of current guidelines. The STT with reduced doses of alteplase was associated with a more significant decrease SPPA and normalization of hemogram parameters when compared to the standard treatment approach. At the same time, selective thrombolysis was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. A prospective study of the efficacy and safety of prolonged STT with the selection of the dose of thrombolytic in patients with PE with an intermediate-high risk of 30-day mortality is needed.
肺栓塞:中高危人群介入治疗的选择
选择性经导管溶栓(STT)治疗具有30天死亡率中高风险的肺栓塞(PE)患者是快速肺再灌注的一种选择,右心室(RV)后负荷降低,这在很大程度上决定了患者的预后。对来自Almazov国家医学研究中心的数据进行回顾性分析,比较使用减少剂量阿替普酶的STT和常规保守治疗对30天死亡中高风险PE患者的疗效。设计和方法。回顾性单中心研究纳入了45例患者,其中男性18例(40%),女性27例(60%),于2021年1月1日至2022年5月1日在Almazov国家医学研究中心麻醉和复苏科住院,确诊为急性PE。根据治疗策略将22例中高危患者分为两组:接受标准抗凝治疗组(n = 15(68.2%))和STT合并阿替普酶治疗组(n = 7(31.8%))。为了评估治疗效果,根据医疗信息系统的数据,对主要实验室指标和仪器指标进行了比较。对照组的基线临床特征没有差异。经导管治疗组肺动脉收缩压(SPPA)由59[50]下降;82] ~ 35 [30;65毫米汞柱;保守治疗组:65例[50例];70] ~ 52 [40;59]毫米汞柱。在选择性溶栓组中,与抗凝治疗组相比,SPPA有更大的下降趋势:-25 [-29;- 3] vs - 10 [- 23;-6] mmHg, vol = 0,047。经导管治疗组与抗凝治疗组白细胞和血小板水平有显著变化:- 5,0 [6,1;[4,1] × 109/l vs . - 2,8 [4,3;1,8] × 109/l (p = 0,017)和130 [32;× 1012/l vs . 31 [2;[56] × 1012/l (r = 0.044)。两组间RV大小的变化无显著差异。两组在出血性并发症的总数上没有差异。当出血按严重程度划分时(根据TIMI分类),选择性溶栓组中中度出血更为常见(2例,而保守方法为0例,p = 0.014)。两组患者在麻醉复苏科的治疗时间和住院时间均无差异。一项单中心回顾性研究表明,根据目前的指导方针,PE的诊断和治疗方法具有很高的质量。与标准治疗方法相比,减少阿替普酶剂量的STT与更显著的SPPA降低和血象参数正常化相关。同时,选择性溶栓与出血性并发症的高风险相关。需要对具有30天死亡率中高风险的PE患者进行延长STT治疗的有效性和安全性以及溶栓剂量的选择进行前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arterial Hypertension (Russian Federation)
Arterial Hypertension (Russian Federation) Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The main aims of the Journal include collecting and generalizing the knowledge in hypertensiology; education and professional development of cardiologists and medical doctors of other specialties, who deal with different issues regarding diagnostics, management and prevention of hypertension in both clinical practice and research. The Journal also calls attention to the most urgent and up-to-date questions in hypertensiology, cardiology and related sciences. There are additional objectives, such as increasing the availability, accessibility and recognition of Russian medical scientific achievements at the international level by improving the quality of the publication and the way they are presented; enabling the exchange of opinions and information between scientists and their wider communication. The main criteria for publication selection fit with the mentioned objectives and include currency, singularity, scientific and practical novelty, applied relevance etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信