{"title":"Improved Correlations for the Unstretched Laminar Flame Properties of\n Mixtures of Air with Iso-octane and Gasoline Surrogates TRF86 and\n TRF70","authors":"Delong Li, Matthew J. Hall, R. Matthews","doi":"10.4271/03-16-08-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laminar flame properties embody the fundamental information in flame chemistry\n and are key parameters to understanding flame propagation. The current study\n focuses on two parameters: the unstretched laminar flame speed (LFS) and\n ϕm\n (the equivalence ratio at which the LFS reaches its maximum). Most\n existing correlations for LFS are either only applicable within a narrow range\n of conditions or built on a large number of coefficients. Few correlations are\n available for ϕm\n . Thus, the objectives of the current study are to provide accurate,\n while concise, correlations for both properties for a wide range of working\n conditions in internal combustion (IC) engines, including dilution effects. The\n original results were obtained for iso-octane and gasoline surrogates from\n one-dimensional (1D) simulations for a range of 300–950 K for unburned\n temperature, 1–120 bar for system pressure, 0.6–1.4 for equivalence ratio, and\n 0–0.5 for diluent mass fraction, and then were correlated using an improved\n power law method and an improved Arrhenius form method. Comparisons with the\n literature show that the predicted LFSs from both methods and\n ϕm\n s are close to the experimental measurements for a wide range of\n conditions. The predicted dilution factor has a similar trend with others, but\n fewer coefficients are needed. Overall, the improved Arrhenius form is\n recommended to calculate the LFS for future use, considering its lower standard\n errors. The experimental measurements at very high temperatures and pressures\n are limited, and thus the predictions under these conditions need further\n validation.","PeriodicalId":47948,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Engines","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Engines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-16-08-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Laminar flame properties embody the fundamental information in flame chemistry
and are key parameters to understanding flame propagation. The current study
focuses on two parameters: the unstretched laminar flame speed (LFS) and
ϕm
(the equivalence ratio at which the LFS reaches its maximum). Most
existing correlations for LFS are either only applicable within a narrow range
of conditions or built on a large number of coefficients. Few correlations are
available for ϕm
. Thus, the objectives of the current study are to provide accurate,
while concise, correlations for both properties for a wide range of working
conditions in internal combustion (IC) engines, including dilution effects. The
original results were obtained for iso-octane and gasoline surrogates from
one-dimensional (1D) simulations for a range of 300–950 K for unburned
temperature, 1–120 bar for system pressure, 0.6–1.4 for equivalence ratio, and
0–0.5 for diluent mass fraction, and then were correlated using an improved
power law method and an improved Arrhenius form method. Comparisons with the
literature show that the predicted LFSs from both methods and
ϕm
s are close to the experimental measurements for a wide range of
conditions. The predicted dilution factor has a similar trend with others, but
fewer coefficients are needed. Overall, the improved Arrhenius form is
recommended to calculate the LFS for future use, considering its lower standard
errors. The experimental measurements at very high temperatures and pressures
are limited, and thus the predictions under these conditions need further
validation.