E. Akbari, F. Sarbazi, A. Karimi, B. Nouri, Shahla Noori Ardebili
{"title":"Comparison of Laparoscopic Myomectomy Outcomes Based on Myoma Weight: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"E. Akbari, F. Sarbazi, A. Karimi, B. Nouri, Shahla Noori Ardebili","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Myomas are the most common non-malignant pelvic neoplasm in women’s reproductive life. The aim of present study was to compare the outcome of large myoma Laparoscopy in Iranian reproductive-age women. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 women with symptomatic uterine myoma who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy between December 2013 and October 2018. Participants were divided into two groups based on the myoma weight (<80 (n=15) and ≥80 g (n=71)). Finally, age, body mass index, number of myomas removed, duration of surgery, postoperative hospitalization, amount of blood transfusion, and hemoglobin reduction were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Results: The mean age of participants were similar in both groups (P=0.48). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding body mass index (P=0.56) and indications for laparoscopic myomectomy (P=0.46). The mean weight of myoma and duration of surgery were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001 and P<0.007, respectively). Changes in hemoglobin and days of hospitalization after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The length of hospital stay and blood loss in laparoscopic myomectomy did not differ significantly based on myoma weight. So, laparoscopic myomectomy could be considered a minimally invasive alternative for managing symptomatic large myoma.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives: Myomas are the most common non-malignant pelvic neoplasm in women’s reproductive life. The aim of present study was to compare the outcome of large myoma Laparoscopy in Iranian reproductive-age women. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 women with symptomatic uterine myoma who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy between December 2013 and October 2018. Participants were divided into two groups based on the myoma weight (<80 (n=15) and ≥80 g (n=71)). Finally, age, body mass index, number of myomas removed, duration of surgery, postoperative hospitalization, amount of blood transfusion, and hemoglobin reduction were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Results: The mean age of participants were similar in both groups (P=0.48). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding body mass index (P=0.56) and indications for laparoscopic myomectomy (P=0.46). The mean weight of myoma and duration of surgery were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001 and P<0.007, respectively). Changes in hemoglobin and days of hospitalization after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The length of hospital stay and blood loss in laparoscopic myomectomy did not differ significantly based on myoma weight. So, laparoscopic myomectomy could be considered a minimally invasive alternative for managing symptomatic large myoma.
目的:子宫肌瘤是女性生殖期最常见的非恶性盆腔肿瘤。本研究的目的是比较伊朗育龄妇女大肌瘤腹腔镜检查的结果。材料与方法:本横断面研究对2013年12月至2018年10月期间行腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的86例有症状的子宫肌瘤患者进行了研究。根据肌瘤重量(<80 g (n=15)和≥80 g (n=71))将参与者分为两组。最后比较两组患者的年龄、体重指数、肌瘤切除数、手术时间、术后住院时间、输血量、血红蛋白下降情况。数据采用SPSS软件22进行分析。结果:两组患者平均年龄相近(P=0.48)。两组患者的体重指数(P=0.56)和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的指征(P=0.46)差异无统计学意义。两组肌瘤的平均重量和手术时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001和P<0.007)。两组患者术后血红蛋白及住院天数变化无明显差异。结论:腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的住院时间和出血量与子宫肌瘤重量无显著差异。因此,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术可以被认为是治疗有症状的大肌瘤的微创选择。