Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
E. Suzuki, E. Yamamoto
{"title":"Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework","authors":"E. Suzuki, E. Yamamoto","doi":"10.1515/jci-2021-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The attributable fraction (population) has attracted much attention from a theoretical perspective and has been used extensively to assess the impact of potential health interventions. However, despite its extensive use, there is much confusion about its concept and calculation methods. In this article, we discuss the concepts of and calculation methods for the attributable fraction and related measures in the counterfactual framework, both with and without stratification by covariates. Generally, the attributable fraction is useful when the exposure of interest has a causal effect on the outcome. However, it is important to understand that this statement applies to the exposed group. Although the target population of the attributable fraction (population) is the total population, the causal effect should be present not in the total population but in the exposed group. As related measures, we discuss the preventable fraction and prevented fraction, which are generally useful when the exposure of interest has a preventive effect on the outcome, and we further propose a new measure called the attributed fraction. We also discuss the causal and preventive excess fractions, and provide notes on vaccine efficacy. Finally, we discuss the relations between the aforementioned six measures and six possible patterns using a conceptual schema.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Causal Inference","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The attributable fraction (population) has attracted much attention from a theoretical perspective and has been used extensively to assess the impact of potential health interventions. However, despite its extensive use, there is much confusion about its concept and calculation methods. In this article, we discuss the concepts of and calculation methods for the attributable fraction and related measures in the counterfactual framework, both with and without stratification by covariates. Generally, the attributable fraction is useful when the exposure of interest has a causal effect on the outcome. However, it is important to understand that this statement applies to the exposed group. Although the target population of the attributable fraction (population) is the total population, the causal effect should be present not in the total population but in the exposed group. As related measures, we discuss the preventable fraction and prevented fraction, which are generally useful when the exposure of interest has a preventive effect on the outcome, and we further propose a new measure called the attributed fraction. We also discuss the causal and preventive excess fractions, and provide notes on vaccine efficacy. Finally, we discuss the relations between the aforementioned six measures and six possible patterns using a conceptual schema.
归因分数与相关测度:反事实框架中的概念关系
归因分数(人口)从理论角度引起了人们的广泛关注,并被广泛用于评估潜在健康干预措施的影响。然而,尽管它被广泛使用,但在其概念和计算方法上却存在许多混乱。在本文中,我们讨论了在有和没有协变量分层的反事实框架中归因分数和相关测度的概念和计算方法。一般来说,当兴趣的暴露对结果有因果影响时,归因分数是有用的。然而,重要的是要明白,这种说法适用于暴露的群体。虽然归因部分(人群)的目标人群是总人口,但因果效应不应出现在总人口中,而应出现在受照人群中。作为相关度量,我们讨论了可预防分数和预防分数,当兴趣暴露对结果有预防作用时,它们通常是有用的,我们进一步提出了一个新的度量,称为归因分数。我们还讨论了因果性和预防性的过量分数,并提供了关于疫苗功效的说明。最后,我们使用概念图式讨论了上述六种度量和六种可能模式之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Causal Inference
Journal of Causal Inference Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
86 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Causal Inference (JCI) publishes papers on theoretical and applied causal research across the range of academic disciplines that use quantitative tools to study causality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信