Large scale studies of holistic professional competence in vocational education and training (VET): The case of Norway

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Lahn, H. Nore
{"title":"Large scale studies of holistic professional competence in vocational education and training (VET): The case of Norway","authors":"L. Lahn, H. Nore","doi":"10.13152/IJRVET.6.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: In this paper, we review and discuss the piloting in Norway of a German methodology for competence diagnostics in vocational education and training: the Competence Development and Assessment in TVET (COMET) project. Our overarching theme is determining to what extent such large-scale assessment systems are valid for international comparisons in this sector. Method: We present the theoretical underpinnings of the COMET model and position our discussion within the broader context of the concept of “professional competence” (berufliche Kompetenz) and methodological guidelines for its measurement. Terminology from psychometrics on “measurement equivalence” is described and serves as a template for identifying challenges in using the Norwegian data for comparative purposes. Our pilot included students and apprentices in health care, industrial mechanics and electricians and was designed as a three-year follow-up study from the second year of upper secondary school through two years of apprenticeship. Each year, a test on professional competence and a context survey were administered. Similar studies have been conducted in Germany, China and South Africa.Results: In line with the results from these countries, the Norwegian participants had low scores, particularly the electricians. However, the diagnostic instrument was sensitive to the development of professional competence, and progress on the assessment was influenced by the quality of the learning support in the companies, as reported by apprentices in the context survey.Conclusions: The COMET platform may be a viable prototype for the development of diagnostic tools, which may support the monitoring of quality factors at different levels and inspire local improvement projects in schools, companies and training offices. Such an objective would be in line with the latest summaries of the COMET project, in which its contribution to a model for international large-scale assessment is toned down and replaced by a stronger emphasis on its potential for measuring competence development, evaluating contextual factors and generating data for didactic innovations.","PeriodicalId":37080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Context: In this paper, we review and discuss the piloting in Norway of a German methodology for competence diagnostics in vocational education and training: the Competence Development and Assessment in TVET (COMET) project. Our overarching theme is determining to what extent such large-scale assessment systems are valid for international comparisons in this sector. Method: We present the theoretical underpinnings of the COMET model and position our discussion within the broader context of the concept of “professional competence” (berufliche Kompetenz) and methodological guidelines for its measurement. Terminology from psychometrics on “measurement equivalence” is described and serves as a template for identifying challenges in using the Norwegian data for comparative purposes. Our pilot included students and apprentices in health care, industrial mechanics and electricians and was designed as a three-year follow-up study from the second year of upper secondary school through two years of apprenticeship. Each year, a test on professional competence and a context survey were administered. Similar studies have been conducted in Germany, China and South Africa.Results: In line with the results from these countries, the Norwegian participants had low scores, particularly the electricians. However, the diagnostic instrument was sensitive to the development of professional competence, and progress on the assessment was influenced by the quality of the learning support in the companies, as reported by apprentices in the context survey.Conclusions: The COMET platform may be a viable prototype for the development of diagnostic tools, which may support the monitoring of quality factors at different levels and inspire local improvement projects in schools, companies and training offices. Such an objective would be in line with the latest summaries of the COMET project, in which its contribution to a model for international large-scale assessment is toned down and replaced by a stronger emphasis on its potential for measuring competence development, evaluating contextual factors and generating data for didactic innovations.
职业教育和培训(VET)中全面专业能力的大规模研究:挪威的案例
背景:在本文中,我们回顾和讨论了德国在挪威试点的职业教育和培训能力诊断方法:TVET能力发展和评估(COMET)项目。我们的首要主题是确定这种大规模评估系统在多大程度上对该部门的国际比较有效。方法:我们提出了COMET模型的理论基础,并将我们的讨论置于“专业能力”(berufliche Kompetenz)概念和测量方法指南的更广泛背景下。本文描述了心理测量学中关于“测量等效性”的术语,并将其作为模板,用于确定将挪威数据用于比较目的的挑战。我们的试点包括卫生保健、工业机械和电工领域的学生和学徒,并设计为从高中二年级到两年学徒期的三年后续研究。每年进行一次专业能力测试和背景调查。德国、中国和南非也进行了类似的研究。结果:与这些国家的结果一致,挪威的参与者得分较低,尤其是电工。然而,诊断工具对专业能力的发展很敏感,评估的进展受到公司学习支持质量的影响,正如学徒在背景调查中报告的那样。结论:COMET平台可能是开发诊断工具的可行原型,可支持不同层次的质量因素监测,并可启发学校、公司和培训机构的地方改进项目。这一目标将符合COMET项目的最新摘要,其中降低了它对国际大规模评价模式的贡献,取而代之的是更加强调它在衡量能力发展、评价环境因素和为教学创新产生数据方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信