Combined analytical and empirical learning framework for branch and bound algorithms: the knapsack problem

M.J. Realff , P.H. Kvam , W.E. Taylor
{"title":"Combined analytical and empirical learning framework for branch and bound algorithms: the knapsack problem","authors":"M.J. Realff ,&nbsp;P.H. Kvam ,&nbsp;W.E. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/S0954-1810(99)00004-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Optimization methods are being applied to engineering problem solving with increasing frequency as computer hardware and software improves. The configuration of an optimization algorithm can make a significant difference to the efficiency of the solution process. This article examines the use of one such optimization strategy, branch and bound, for the solution of the classic knapsack problem. It is shown that the best configuration of the algorithm can be data dependent and hence that an ‘intelligent’ optimization system will need to automatically configure itself with the control knowledge appropriate to the problems the user is solving. A two-step approach is taken to configuring the algorithm. First, an analytical learning method, explanation based learning is used to derive a provably correct dominance condition for the knapsack problem. Second, the algorithm is configured with and without the condition, and subjected to a rigorous statistical test of performance, on the user's data, to decide which configuration is the best.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100123,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Engineering","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 287-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0954-1810(99)00004-7","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954181099000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Optimization methods are being applied to engineering problem solving with increasing frequency as computer hardware and software improves. The configuration of an optimization algorithm can make a significant difference to the efficiency of the solution process. This article examines the use of one such optimization strategy, branch and bound, for the solution of the classic knapsack problem. It is shown that the best configuration of the algorithm can be data dependent and hence that an ‘intelligent’ optimization system will need to automatically configure itself with the control knowledge appropriate to the problems the user is solving. A two-step approach is taken to configuring the algorithm. First, an analytical learning method, explanation based learning is used to derive a provably correct dominance condition for the knapsack problem. Second, the algorithm is configured with and without the condition, and subjected to a rigorous statistical test of performance, on the user's data, to decide which configuration is the best.

分支定界算法的综合分析与经验学习框架:背包问题
随着计算机硬件和软件的改进,优化方法越来越多地应用于工程问题的解决。优化算法的配置对求解过程的效率有显著影响。本文研究了一种这样的优化策略,分支定界,用于解决经典的背包问题。结果表明,算法的最佳配置可以依赖于数据,因此,“智能”优化系统将需要自动配置适合用户正在解决的问题的控制知识。采用两步方法来配置算法。首先,利用分析学习方法——基于解释的学习,推导出一个可证明正确的背包问题优势条件。其次,对算法配置了有条件和无条件,并对用户的数据进行了严格的性能统计测试,以确定哪种配置是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信