Postfire Seedling Establishment of Desert Peach (Prunus fasciculata) and Joshua Tree (Yucca brevifolia) from Simulated Seed Caches in the Mojave Desert

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
M. Borchert
{"title":"Postfire Seedling Establishment of Desert Peach (Prunus fasciculata) and Joshua Tree (Yucca brevifolia) from Simulated Seed Caches in the Mojave Desert","authors":"M. Borchert","doi":"10.3398/064.082.0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Desert rodents in the western USA cache enormous numbers of seeds. Seed caches represent a reliable, although highly variable, source of seedling recruitment for numerous desert plants. Prefire caching of refractory seeds (i.e., those capable of forming persistent seed banks) is an important source of postfire seedling recruitment, but it is likely that prefire caches of short-lived seeds also may contribute to postfire regeneration. The primary objective of this study was to quantify seedling recruitment from artificial caches of 2 species with short-lived seeds planted after a stand-replacing wildfire in a singleleaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla) forest. I investigated the survival of 180 artificial caches of Yucca brevifolia and Prunus fasciculata. Caches were composed of 2, 4, or 8 seeds. Also, because soils of the burned area have unusually high coarse fragment volumes (59%), I examined, in greenhouse trials, how soil coarse fragment volumes (CFVs) impacted seedling establishment of these 2 species from caches. In greenhouse trials, the number of P. fasciculata seedlings increased with increasing CFVs. In contrast, Y. brevifolia seedling numbers decreased with increasing CFVs. In field transects, 17% of cached P. fasciculata seeds produced seedlings, whereas 12% of Y. brevifolia seeds recruited seedlings in the first year postfire. The advantage of P. fasciculata in greenhouse CFV trials was not replicated in field seedling recruitment. Seedling mortality over the first 3 years postfire was not statistically different among the 3 cache sizes for either species, nor did seedling sizes differ significantly by cache size and survey date. I conclude that, although the overall recruitment from postfire caches was low (12%–17%), prefire caches of short-lived seeds probably recruit postfire seedlings, but only in specific circumstances.","PeriodicalId":49364,"journal":{"name":"Western North American Naturalist","volume":"26 1","pages":"107 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western North American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3398/064.082.0110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Desert rodents in the western USA cache enormous numbers of seeds. Seed caches represent a reliable, although highly variable, source of seedling recruitment for numerous desert plants. Prefire caching of refractory seeds (i.e., those capable of forming persistent seed banks) is an important source of postfire seedling recruitment, but it is likely that prefire caches of short-lived seeds also may contribute to postfire regeneration. The primary objective of this study was to quantify seedling recruitment from artificial caches of 2 species with short-lived seeds planted after a stand-replacing wildfire in a singleleaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla) forest. I investigated the survival of 180 artificial caches of Yucca brevifolia and Prunus fasciculata. Caches were composed of 2, 4, or 8 seeds. Also, because soils of the burned area have unusually high coarse fragment volumes (59%), I examined, in greenhouse trials, how soil coarse fragment volumes (CFVs) impacted seedling establishment of these 2 species from caches. In greenhouse trials, the number of P. fasciculata seedlings increased with increasing CFVs. In contrast, Y. brevifolia seedling numbers decreased with increasing CFVs. In field transects, 17% of cached P. fasciculata seeds produced seedlings, whereas 12% of Y. brevifolia seeds recruited seedlings in the first year postfire. The advantage of P. fasciculata in greenhouse CFV trials was not replicated in field seedling recruitment. Seedling mortality over the first 3 years postfire was not statistically different among the 3 cache sizes for either species, nor did seedling sizes differ significantly by cache size and survey date. I conclude that, although the overall recruitment from postfire caches was low (12%–17%), prefire caches of short-lived seeds probably recruit postfire seedlings, but only in specific circumstances.
莫哈韦沙漠模拟种子库中沙漠桃树(Prunus fasciculata)和约书亚树(Yucca brevifolia)火后育苗
摘要美国西部的沙漠啮齿动物储藏了大量的种子。种子贮藏是一种可靠的种子来源,尽管对许多沙漠植物来说变化很大。耐火种子(即那些能够形成持久种子库的种子)的火前贮藏是火后幼苗招募的重要来源,但很可能短寿命种子的火前贮藏也有助于火后再生。本研究的主要目的是量化在单叶小松(Pinus monophylla)森林中,在换林后种植两种短寿命种子的人工贮藏库中幼苗的招募情况。研究了180株短叶丝兰和束状李人工贮藏苗的成活率。缓存由2颗、4颗或8颗种子组成。此外,由于燃烧区域的土壤具有异常高的粗碎片体积(59%),我在温室试验中检查了土壤粗碎片体积(CFVs)如何影响这两个物种从贮藏库中建立幼苗。在温室试验中,随着CFVs的增加,束草幼苗数量增加。相比之下,短叶青的幼苗数量随着CFVs的增加而减少。在田间样带中,17%贮藏的束状松种子在火灾后的第一年产生了幼苗,而12%的短叶松种子在火灾后的第一年产生了幼苗。在温室CFV试验中,花束草的优势没有在田间招募中得到复制。3种不同贮藏地的幼苗在火灾后3年内的死亡率无统计学差异,不同贮藏地和调查日期的幼苗死亡率也无显著差异。我的结论是,尽管从火后贮藏的总体招募率很低(12%-17%),但在特定情况下,短寿命种子的火前贮藏可能会招募火后幼苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western North American Naturalist
Western North American Naturalist 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Western North American Naturalist places neither restriction nor preference on manuscripts within the disciplines of the biological sciences. Each issue treats diverse taxa from the perspectives of various disciplines (e.g., ecology, population dynamics, behavior, systematics, anatomy, and physiology).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信