Comparison Between Feature-Based and Convolutional Neural Network–Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Classification in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Siwa Chan, J. Yeh
{"title":"Comparison Between Feature-Based and Convolutional Neural Network–Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Classification in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis","authors":"Siwa Chan, J. Yeh","doi":"10.32861/jbr.51.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising new technique for breast cancer diagnosis. DBT has the potential to overcome the tissue superimposition problems that occur on traditional mammograms for tumor detection. However, DBT generates numerous images, thereby creating a heavy workload for radiologists. Therefore, constructing an automatic computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for DBT image analysis is necessary. This study compared feature-based CAD and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based CAD for breast cancer classification from DBT images. The research methods included image preprocessing, candidate tumor identification, three-dimensional feature generation, classification, image cropping, augmentation, CNN model design, and deep learning. The precision rates (standard deviation) of the LeNet-based CNN CAD and the feature-based CAD for breast cancer classification were 89.84 (0.013) and 84.46 (0.082), respectively. The T value was -4.091 and the P value was 0.00 < 0.05, which indicate that the LeNet-based CNN CAD significantly outperform the feature-based CAD. However, there is no significantly differences between the LeNet-based CNN CAD and the feature-based CAD on other criteria. The results can be applied to clinical medicine and assist radiologists in breast cancer identification.","PeriodicalId":15122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biotechnology Research Center","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biotechnology Research Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32861/jbr.51.1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising new technique for breast cancer diagnosis. DBT has the potential to overcome the tissue superimposition problems that occur on traditional mammograms for tumor detection. However, DBT generates numerous images, thereby creating a heavy workload for radiologists. Therefore, constructing an automatic computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for DBT image analysis is necessary. This study compared feature-based CAD and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based CAD for breast cancer classification from DBT images. The research methods included image preprocessing, candidate tumor identification, three-dimensional feature generation, classification, image cropping, augmentation, CNN model design, and deep learning. The precision rates (standard deviation) of the LeNet-based CNN CAD and the feature-based CAD for breast cancer classification were 89.84 (0.013) and 84.46 (0.082), respectively. The T value was -4.091 and the P value was 0.00 < 0.05, which indicate that the LeNet-based CNN CAD significantly outperform the feature-based CAD. However, there is no significantly differences between the LeNet-based CNN CAD and the feature-based CAD on other criteria. The results can be applied to clinical medicine and assist radiologists in breast cancer identification.
基于特征和卷积神经网络的计算机辅助诊断在数字乳腺断层合成中乳腺癌分类的比较
数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)是一种很有前途的乳腺癌诊断新技术。DBT有潜力克服传统乳房x光检查中出现的组织重叠问题。然而,DBT产生了大量的图像,从而给放射科医生带来了沉重的工作量。因此,构建一个用于DBT图像分析的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统是必要的。本研究比较了基于特征的CAD和基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的CAD对DBT图像的乳腺癌分类。研究方法包括图像预处理、候选肿瘤识别、三维特征生成、分类、图像裁剪、增强、CNN模型设计、深度学习等。基于lenet的CNN CAD和基于feature的CAD用于乳腺癌分类的准确率(标准差)分别为89.84(0.013)和84.46(0.082)。T值为-4.091,P值为0.00 < 0.05,表明基于lenet的CNN CAD显著优于基于feature的CAD。然而,基于lenet的CNN CAD与基于特征的CAD在其他标准上没有显著差异。研究结果可应用于临床医学,辅助放射科医师进行乳腺癌鉴别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信