Epistemology and academic performance in research methodology

Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.57188/ricso.2022.001
Wilmer Chorres Saldarriaga, Samuel David Ancajima Mena, Víctor Francisco Cruz Cisneros, Adilson Crepalde, Plinio Pereira Filho
{"title":"Epistemology and academic performance in research methodology","authors":"Wilmer Chorres Saldarriaga, Samuel David Ancajima Mena, Víctor Francisco Cruz Cisneros, Adilson Crepalde, Plinio Pereira Filho","doi":"10.57188/ricso.2022.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, few universities are dedicated to train students with an epistemological prole, due to many factors in the university professorship; as well as, there is a lack of interest by authorities, professors, students in directing the love for science, for the simple reason of not investing more budget or other factors. The purpose of this research is to show that the basic epistemological knowledge of history and philosophy improves learning in university students in the rst cycle in the subject called Methodology of Research or University Work; many times, epistemology is confused with the theory of knowledge or gnoseology. The object of the study was to determine the existence and relationship of variables about the epistemology workshop and academic performance. For this research work, the type of pre-experimental applied study was used; the design employed was experimental. The population and sample consisted of 31 students. The research resulted that most students have a high command of analysis, inference and explanation;however,despitetheexperimentationofeachofthesewithacademic performance, it was not signicant. Similarly, the correlation between critical thinking and performance in the subject of Methodology was not signicant, although there was a slight correlation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57188/ricso.2022.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, few universities are dedicated to train students with an epistemological prole, due to many factors in the university professorship; as well as, there is a lack of interest by authorities, professors, students in directing the love for science, for the simple reason of not investing more budget or other factors. The purpose of this research is to show that the basic epistemological knowledge of history and philosophy improves learning in university students in the rst cycle in the subject called Methodology of Research or University Work; many times, epistemology is confused with the theory of knowledge or gnoseology. The object of the study was to determine the existence and relationship of variables about the epistemology workshop and academic performance. For this research work, the type of pre-experimental applied study was used; the design employed was experimental. The population and sample consisted of 31 students. The research resulted that most students have a high command of analysis, inference and explanation;however,despitetheexperimentationofeachofthesewithacademic performance, it was not signicant. Similarly, the correlation between critical thinking and performance in the subject of Methodology was not signicant, although there was a slight correlation.
分享
查看原文
认识论与研究方法论的学术表现
目前,由于大学教授的诸多因素,很少有大学致力于培养具有认识论能力的学生;此外,当局、教授和学生对引导对科学的热爱缺乏兴趣,原因很简单,没有投入更多的预算或其他因素。本研究的目的是为了表明,历史和哲学的基本认识论知识可以改善大学生在第一周期的研究或大学工作方法论的学习;很多时候,认识论与知识论或灵知学混淆。本研究的目的是确定认识论工作坊与学业成绩变量的存在及其关系。本研究工作采用预实验应用研究的方式;所采用的设计是实验性的。总体和样本包括31名学生。研究结果表明,大多数学生具有较高的分析、推理和解释能力;然而,尽管实验将这些能力与学习成绩联系起来,但效果并不显著can。同样,批判性思维和方法论科目的表现之间的相关性不显著can,尽管有轻微的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信