Anti-doping Awareness among British and Japanese Judo Coaches

Y. Tanabe, Colin Mclver, Joyce Heron, Satomi Suzuki, T. Akama
{"title":"Anti-doping Awareness among British and Japanese Judo Coaches","authors":"Y. Tanabe, Colin Mclver, Joyce Heron, Satomi Suzuki, T. Akama","doi":"10.4172/2161-0673.1000191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To reveal the understanding among judo coaches from different countries on anti-doping, and their understanding of how this is intrinsically valuable to sport. \nDesign: Survey study. Participants: 74 British coaches (UK coaches) and 66 Japanese coaches (JPN coaches) certified by the British Judo Association or the All Japan Judo Federation, as appropriate. \nResults: Most of both countries' coaches knew National Anti-Doping Organization and World Anti-Doping Agency. Almost of JPN coaches had attended an anti-doping workshop, however many of UK coaches had never attended such a workshop. There are aimed to compare the two countries’ views of doping along the social, educational, ethical, and health-related aspects. The results from Question 7.1 (I agree with the act of doping), Question 7.6 (Doping enables judoka to improve their performance), and Question 7.9 (Prohibited substances are possibly included in certain legal medicines and food supplements) were significantly different between the UK coaches and JPN coaches groups. \nConclusions: Judo coaches around the world should be educated on anti-doping regimes.","PeriodicalId":17085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies","volume":"309 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0673.1000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To reveal the understanding among judo coaches from different countries on anti-doping, and their understanding of how this is intrinsically valuable to sport. Design: Survey study. Participants: 74 British coaches (UK coaches) and 66 Japanese coaches (JPN coaches) certified by the British Judo Association or the All Japan Judo Federation, as appropriate. Results: Most of both countries' coaches knew National Anti-Doping Organization and World Anti-Doping Agency. Almost of JPN coaches had attended an anti-doping workshop, however many of UK coaches had never attended such a workshop. There are aimed to compare the two countries’ views of doping along the social, educational, ethical, and health-related aspects. The results from Question 7.1 (I agree with the act of doping), Question 7.6 (Doping enables judoka to improve their performance), and Question 7.9 (Prohibited substances are possibly included in certain legal medicines and food supplements) were significantly different between the UK coaches and JPN coaches groups. Conclusions: Judo coaches around the world should be educated on anti-doping regimes.
英国和日本柔道教练的反兴奋剂意识
目的:揭示不同国家柔道教练对反兴奋剂的认识,以及他们对反兴奋剂对体育运动的内在价值的认识。设计:调查研究。参与者:74名英国教练(UK教练)和66名日本教练(JPN教练),由英国柔道协会或全日本柔道联合会(视情况而定)认证。结果:两国教练员对国家反兴奋剂组织和世界反兴奋剂机构的了解程度最高。几乎所有日本队的教练都参加过反兴奋剂研讨会,而许多英国教练从未参加过此类研讨会。目的是比较两国在社会、教育、道德和健康方面对兴奋剂的看法。问题7.1(我同意使用兴奋剂的行为)、问题7.6(兴奋剂使柔道运动员能够提高成绩)和问题7.9(某些合法药品和食品补充剂中可能含有违禁物质)的结果在英国教练组和日本教练组之间存在显著差异。结论:世界各地的柔道教练都应该接受反兴奋剂制度的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信