Inquiry-Based Instruction in Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Literature

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jennifer Krawec, M. Steinberg
{"title":"Inquiry-Based Instruction in Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Literature","authors":"Jennifer Krawec, M. Steinberg","doi":"10.18666/ldmj-2019-v24-i2-9866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opportunities for students to learn mathematics through innovative, authentic experiences in an inquiry-based instructional approach have become much more common for students in regular and advanced math classes. Yet, the same cannot be said for students with learning disabilities. One of the primary reasons is that key tenets of the inquiry approach sit in opposition to the research-validated instructional approaches of direct/explicit instruction, which have been the mainstay of special education pedagogy across the academic domains. However, national trends continue to show significant gaps in the math proficiency of students with disabilities as compared to their peers without disabilities. This persistent discrepancy in achievement underscores the need for research to consider the potential of the inquiry approach for students with learning disabilities. As such, the authors reviewed the relevant literature from 2000 to 2019 to identify the characteristics and effectiveness of inquiry-based math interventions implemented with students with learning disabilities and found that only five studies have empirically tested the effectiveness of inquiry with this population. The implications of this lack of research are discussed. Subscribe to LDMJ","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2019-v24-i2-9866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Opportunities for students to learn mathematics through innovative, authentic experiences in an inquiry-based instructional approach have become much more common for students in regular and advanced math classes. Yet, the same cannot be said for students with learning disabilities. One of the primary reasons is that key tenets of the inquiry approach sit in opposition to the research-validated instructional approaches of direct/explicit instruction, which have been the mainstay of special education pedagogy across the academic domains. However, national trends continue to show significant gaps in the math proficiency of students with disabilities as compared to their peers without disabilities. This persistent discrepancy in achievement underscores the need for research to consider the potential of the inquiry approach for students with learning disabilities. As such, the authors reviewed the relevant literature from 2000 to 2019 to identify the characteristics and effectiveness of inquiry-based math interventions implemented with students with learning disabilities and found that only five studies have empirically tested the effectiveness of inquiry with this population. The implications of this lack of research are discussed. Subscribe to LDMJ
基于探究的学习障碍学生数学教学:文献综述
在普通和高等数学课上,学生通过探究性教学方法的创新、真实体验来学习数学的机会已经变得越来越普遍。然而,对于有学习障碍的学生来说,情况并非如此。其中一个主要原因是,探究方法的关键原则与研究验证的直接/显性教学方法相反,后者一直是学术领域特殊教育教学法的支柱。然而,全国趋势继续显示,残疾学生的数学能力与非残疾学生相比存在显著差距。这种持续的成绩差异强调了研究的必要性,以考虑探究方法对有学习障碍的学生的潜力。因此,作者回顾了2000年至2019年的相关文献,以确定对有学习障碍的学生实施的基于探究的数学干预的特征和有效性,并发现只有五项研究对这一人群的探究有效性进行了实证检验。本文还讨论了这种缺乏研究的影响。订阅LDMJ
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信