On the Importance of Reservoir Rock Mineralogy on Design and Performance of Surfactant-Based EOR Processes

V. Guillon, E. Delamaide, D. Rousseau, M. Morvan
{"title":"On the Importance of Reservoir Rock Mineralogy on Design and Performance of Surfactant-Based EOR Processes","authors":"V. Guillon, E. Delamaide, D. Rousseau, M. Morvan","doi":"10.2118/200247-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Chemical EOR processes based on surfactants are highly constrained by chemicals losses due to retention in porous media. Surfactant adsorption is usually considered as the main retention mechanism. It can lead to a decrease in process efficiency and to an increase in costs. Among the factors impacting surfactant adsorption – namely reservoir rock mineralogy, brine composition and chemicals types — mineralogy is known to be prominent with an impact that is hard to predict and should be dealt with. This paper presents a comprehensive review on the importance of reservoir rock mineralogy on laboratory design and performance evaluation of surfactant-based EOR processes, using several field cases as illustrations.\n First, the main effects of the various factors quoted above on surfactant adsorption will be presented. Then a summary of the mitigation strategies that can be applied on field, based on either brines treatments, chemical selection or specific injections processes, will be presented.\n Four representative cases studies of Surfactant-Polymer process design and evaluation at the lab scale on different mineralogies and conditions will be discussed. Each of them exhibits specific hurdles and requires solutions to mitigate mineralogy impact on designed process. Oil recovery corefloods on reservoir rock were conducted with surfactant in effluent and oil production measurements. Mineralogy analysis were also conducted using XRD, SEM and NMR experiments.\n The first case focuses on a low clay – low temperature sandstone, an apparently simple case which nonetheless shows a very high and unexpected surfactant adsorption due to a very particular clay repartition. The second case focuses on a high clay — high temperature sandstone: this expectedly difficult case was mitigated by the use of adsorption inhibitors, leading to a good oil recovery and a low adsorption. The third case focuses on an unconsolidated – low clay sandstone containing heavy oil which shows a pronounced sensitivity to fine mobilization by surfactant-polymer process. The selected solution was an adapted brine treatment. The last case focuses on a high temperature carbonate which classically shows high adsorptions. A combined process using brine treatment and adsorption inhibitor resulted in particularly low surfactant adsorption of 60 μg/g.\n Mineralogy is shown to be a key factor that controls surfactant adsorption in chemical EOR processes. Using representative mineralogy in the lab feasibility studies is therefore mandatory to design relevant Surfactant-Polymer processes. This review demonstrates that efficient strategies can be developed to mitigate the impact of mineralogy on SP chemical EOR processes in a wide range of challenging conditions.","PeriodicalId":10940,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 22, 2022","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 22, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200247-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Chemical EOR processes based on surfactants are highly constrained by chemicals losses due to retention in porous media. Surfactant adsorption is usually considered as the main retention mechanism. It can lead to a decrease in process efficiency and to an increase in costs. Among the factors impacting surfactant adsorption – namely reservoir rock mineralogy, brine composition and chemicals types — mineralogy is known to be prominent with an impact that is hard to predict and should be dealt with. This paper presents a comprehensive review on the importance of reservoir rock mineralogy on laboratory design and performance evaluation of surfactant-based EOR processes, using several field cases as illustrations. First, the main effects of the various factors quoted above on surfactant adsorption will be presented. Then a summary of the mitigation strategies that can be applied on field, based on either brines treatments, chemical selection or specific injections processes, will be presented. Four representative cases studies of Surfactant-Polymer process design and evaluation at the lab scale on different mineralogies and conditions will be discussed. Each of them exhibits specific hurdles and requires solutions to mitigate mineralogy impact on designed process. Oil recovery corefloods on reservoir rock were conducted with surfactant in effluent and oil production measurements. Mineralogy analysis were also conducted using XRD, SEM and NMR experiments. The first case focuses on a low clay – low temperature sandstone, an apparently simple case which nonetheless shows a very high and unexpected surfactant adsorption due to a very particular clay repartition. The second case focuses on a high clay — high temperature sandstone: this expectedly difficult case was mitigated by the use of adsorption inhibitors, leading to a good oil recovery and a low adsorption. The third case focuses on an unconsolidated – low clay sandstone containing heavy oil which shows a pronounced sensitivity to fine mobilization by surfactant-polymer process. The selected solution was an adapted brine treatment. The last case focuses on a high temperature carbonate which classically shows high adsorptions. A combined process using brine treatment and adsorption inhibitor resulted in particularly low surfactant adsorption of 60 μg/g. Mineralogy is shown to be a key factor that controls surfactant adsorption in chemical EOR processes. Using representative mineralogy in the lab feasibility studies is therefore mandatory to design relevant Surfactant-Polymer processes. This review demonstrates that efficient strategies can be developed to mitigate the impact of mineralogy on SP chemical EOR processes in a wide range of challenging conditions.
论储层岩石矿物学对基于表面活性剂的提高采收率工艺设计和性能的重要性
基于表面活性剂的化学提高采收率过程受到化学物质在多孔介质中滞留造成的损失的高度限制。表面活性剂吸附通常被认为是主要的保留机制。它可能导致流程效率的降低和成本的增加。在影响表面活性剂吸附的因素(即储层岩石矿物学、卤水组成和化学物质类型)中,矿物学的影响最为突出,且难以预测,必须加以处理。本文综合评述了储层岩石矿物学对基于表面活性剂的提高采收率工艺的实验室设计和性能评价的重要性,并以几个现场案例为例进行了说明。首先,介绍了上述各种因素对表面活性剂吸附的主要影响。然后,将根据盐水处理、化学品选择或特定注入工艺,概述可在现场应用的缓解策略。将讨论在不同矿物学和条件下,在实验室规模上对表面活性剂-聚合物工艺设计和评价的四个代表性案例。每一个都有特定的障碍,需要解决方案来减轻矿物学对设计过程的影响。采用表面活性剂对储层岩心进行了采油驱油,并进行了采油测量。采用XRD、SEM、NMR等实验对样品进行了矿物学分析。第一个案例的重点是低粘土-低温砂岩,这显然是一个简单的案例,但由于非常特殊的粘土重分配,表面活性剂的吸附性非常高,出乎意料。第二个案例的重点是高粘土-高温砂岩:使用吸附抑制剂缓解了这个预期的困难情况,从而获得了良好的采收率和低吸附性。第三种情况是含重油的松散低粘土砂岩,它对表面活性剂-聚合物工艺的精细动员表现出明显的敏感性。所选择的溶液是经过调整的盐水处理。最后一个例子是高温碳酸盐,它通常表现出高吸附性。采用卤水处理和吸附抑制剂联合处理,表面活性剂的吸附性较低,为60 μg/g。矿物学是化学提高采收率过程中控制表面活性剂吸附的关键因素。因此,在实验室可行性研究中使用代表性矿物学是设计相关表面活性剂-聚合物工艺的必要条件。该综述表明,在各种具有挑战性的条件下,可以制定有效的策略来减轻矿物学对SP化学提高采收率过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信