{"title":"Possessive and non-identity relations in Turkic switch-reference","authors":"András Bárány, I. Nikolaeva","doi":"10.1075/sl.19061.bar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an overview of non-canonical patterns of switch-reference involving the converb in -(V)p\n in selected Turkic languages. This converb is usually described as a \nsame-subject converb, but we show that it can conform to McKenzie’s \n(2012) extended definition of “same-subject” as expressing the identity \nof topic situations, rather than subject referents. In addition to \ntracking cross-clausal subject identity, -(V)p can be used when \nthe possessor of the subject of one clause corefers with the subject of \nanother clause and when the events expressed by the two clauses are in a\n close temporal and/or causal relationship. Based on Stirling (1993) and\n Barany & Nikolaeva (2019), we argue that the role of possessors in \nTurkic switch-reference is captured by lexically specified conditions \nlicensing the use of -(V)p when two subjects are in a possessive \nrelation. Finally, we suggest that both types of non-canonical \nswitch-reference can be seen as ensuring discourse continuity.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19061.bar","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of non-canonical patterns of switch-reference involving the converb in -(V)p
in selected Turkic languages. This converb is usually described as a
same-subject converb, but we show that it can conform to McKenzie’s
(2012) extended definition of “same-subject” as expressing the identity
of topic situations, rather than subject referents. In addition to
tracking cross-clausal subject identity, -(V)p can be used when
the possessor of the subject of one clause corefers with the subject of
another clause and when the events expressed by the two clauses are in a
close temporal and/or causal relationship. Based on Stirling (1993) and
Barany & Nikolaeva (2019), we argue that the role of possessors in
Turkic switch-reference is captured by lexically specified conditions
licensing the use of -(V)p when two subjects are in a possessive
relation. Finally, we suggest that both types of non-canonical
switch-reference can be seen as ensuring discourse continuity.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.