Ivan the Terrible’s Itinerarium: A Study of the Evidence

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
K. Erusalimskiy
{"title":"Ivan the Terrible’s Itinerarium: A Study of the Evidence","authors":"K. Erusalimskiy","doi":"10.18254/s207987840024757-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of sources on Ivan the Terrible’s travels and stays in capitals allows us to group the data into five types: certified acts (gramotas), narrative sources, registration data, ambassadorial documentation and memoria. A special section of the work proves the value of foreign sources, which do not form any special type in the classification. The acts of internal records provide very little information about Ivan the Terrible’s trips outside Moscow (6 % together with embassy documentation this percentage can be a little higher). At the same time, about 11 % of the localizations of the acts are of a formal nature and do not correspond to all the available information about the location of Ivan the Terrible at the time of their issuance. Narrative monuments have their own specifics. They are much more diverse than the acts: according the method elaborated for the case, 27 % of the exact localizations of official chronicles reflect the travels of the tsar and his family around the country. At the same time, the record books of the ranking department specify in detail (in some cases, day by day) the military campaigns in which Ivan Vasilievich personally took part. The difference between the early years of the reign under study from the “second half” of the reign only in the fact that the volume of record keeping over time increases, and the chronicle case comes to a standstill, and we have at our disposal a different range of verification sources. Chronicles are largely replaced by often far from accurate — despite their businesslike nature — certified gramotas, as well as sources of foreign origin. The total range of evidence studied is about 4 500 records (more or less precise dates / localizations), covering with varying completeness all periods of life of Ivan IV. It allows us to ask new questions about the movements of the Grand Duke and Tsar in Russia and abroad.","PeriodicalId":43742,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskaya Istoriya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskaya Istoriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840024757-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of sources on Ivan the Terrible’s travels and stays in capitals allows us to group the data into five types: certified acts (gramotas), narrative sources, registration data, ambassadorial documentation and memoria. A special section of the work proves the value of foreign sources, which do not form any special type in the classification. The acts of internal records provide very little information about Ivan the Terrible’s trips outside Moscow (6 % together with embassy documentation this percentage can be a little higher). At the same time, about 11 % of the localizations of the acts are of a formal nature and do not correspond to all the available information about the location of Ivan the Terrible at the time of their issuance. Narrative monuments have their own specifics. They are much more diverse than the acts: according the method elaborated for the case, 27 % of the exact localizations of official chronicles reflect the travels of the tsar and his family around the country. At the same time, the record books of the ranking department specify in detail (in some cases, day by day) the military campaigns in which Ivan Vasilievich personally took part. The difference between the early years of the reign under study from the “second half” of the reign only in the fact that the volume of record keeping over time increases, and the chronicle case comes to a standstill, and we have at our disposal a different range of verification sources. Chronicles are largely replaced by often far from accurate — despite their businesslike nature — certified gramotas, as well as sources of foreign origin. The total range of evidence studied is about 4 500 records (more or less precise dates / localizations), covering with varying completeness all periods of life of Ivan IV. It allows us to ask new questions about the movements of the Grand Duke and Tsar in Russia and abroad.
伊凡雷帝的旅行路线:证据研究
通过对伊凡雷帝旅行和在首都停留的资料的研究,我们可以将这些资料分为五类:经证实的行为(gramotas)、叙述资料、登记资料、大使文件和记忆。作品的特殊部分证明了外国来源的价值,这些来源在分类中不形成任何特殊类型。内部记录的行为提供了很少关于伊凡雷帝在莫斯科以外的旅行的信息(6%与大使馆文件一起,这个百分比可能会高一点)。与此同时,约11%的行为本地化是正式性质的,与发布时关于伊凡雷帝所在地的所有可用信息不相符。叙事性纪念碑有自己的特点。它们比法令更加多样化:根据为案例详细阐述的方法,官方编年史中27%的准确本地化反映了沙皇及其家人在全国各地的旅行。与此同时,高级部门的记录簿详细地(在某些情况下,逐日地)记录了伊万·瓦西里耶维奇亲自参加的军事行动。所研究的统治的早期与统治的“后半期”之间的区别只在于记录的数量随着时间的推移而增加,而编年史的情况则停滞不前,我们可以使用不同范围的验证来源。编年史在很大程度上被远不准确的——尽管它们具有商业性质——经认证的纪事,以及外国来源所取代。所研究的证据的总范围约为4500份记录(或多或少精确的日期/地点),涵盖了伊凡四世生活的各个时期,其完整性各不相同。这使我们能够对大公和沙皇在俄罗斯和国外的活动提出新的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信