Russian Poetic Neo-avant-garde of the 2nd Half of the 20th Century: On Issue of the Term’s Use Boundaries

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE
M. Pavlovets
{"title":"Russian Poetic Neo-avant-garde of the 2nd Half of the 20th Century: On Issue of the Term’s Use Boundaries","authors":"M. Pavlovets","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-10-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the neo-avant-garde literary trend that emerged in the Soviet underground of the 2nd half of the 20th century. The paper states that the use of the term “neo-avant-garde” with respect to post-war avant-garde has already become conventional in European art and art studies, however it has not yet established in the Russian scientific vocabulary. Moreover, in the field of literary study a significant amount of research material has been collected, which allows us to indicate the existence of Russian poetic neo-avant-garde in the 2nd half of the 20th century. Its authors primarily were either localized within the uncensored literary underground, or abroad as emigres. The article concludes that the Russian neo-avant-garde differed from historical avant-garde (1900–1930s) in the same ways Western neo-avant-garde did: it rejected the socio-political utopianism in favor of an aesthetical utopia that implied the avoidance of any ideology with a virtually escapist concentration on solving solely art tasks. In addition, neo-avant-garde was interested in the issues of revival, continuation and completion of traditions of historical avant-garde, which in its own times manifested declaratively the breakup with every single tradition. Neo-avantgardists mainly inherited the most radical searches of historical avant-garde authors, who often converged their poetry with the boundaries of art as a whole or with zones of visual, acoustic, performative or other art that adjoin verbal poetry.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-10-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the neo-avant-garde literary trend that emerged in the Soviet underground of the 2nd half of the 20th century. The paper states that the use of the term “neo-avant-garde” with respect to post-war avant-garde has already become conventional in European art and art studies, however it has not yet established in the Russian scientific vocabulary. Moreover, in the field of literary study a significant amount of research material has been collected, which allows us to indicate the existence of Russian poetic neo-avant-garde in the 2nd half of the 20th century. Its authors primarily were either localized within the uncensored literary underground, or abroad as emigres. The article concludes that the Russian neo-avant-garde differed from historical avant-garde (1900–1930s) in the same ways Western neo-avant-garde did: it rejected the socio-political utopianism in favor of an aesthetical utopia that implied the avoidance of any ideology with a virtually escapist concentration on solving solely art tasks. In addition, neo-avant-garde was interested in the issues of revival, continuation and completion of traditions of historical avant-garde, which in its own times manifested declaratively the breakup with every single tradition. Neo-avantgardists mainly inherited the most radical searches of historical avant-garde authors, who often converged their poetry with the boundaries of art as a whole or with zones of visual, acoustic, performative or other art that adjoin verbal poetry.
20世纪下半叶俄罗斯新先锋诗歌:术语使用边界问题
这篇文章专门介绍了20世纪下半叶苏联地下出现的新先锋文学思潮。论文指出,“新前卫”一词与战后前卫艺术相关,在欧洲艺术和艺术研究中已经成为惯例,但它尚未在俄罗斯科学词汇中建立起来。此外,在文学研究领域,已经收集了大量的研究资料,这使我们能够表明20世纪下半叶俄罗斯诗歌新先锋主义的存在。它的作者主要是在不受审查的地下文学中,或者作为移民到国外。文章的结论是,俄罗斯新先锋派与历史先锋派(1900 - 1930)的不同之处在于西方新先锋派所做的同样的方式:它拒绝社会政治乌托邦主义,赞成美学乌托邦,这意味着避免任何意识形态,实际上是逃避现实,专注于解决艺术任务。此外,新先锋派对历史先锋派传统的复兴、延续和完成感兴趣,这些传统在其所处的时代表现出与每一个传统的决裂。新先锋派主要继承了历史上先锋派作家最激进的探索,他们经常将自己的诗歌与艺术的整体边界融合在一起,或者与视觉、听觉、表演或其他艺术毗邻的区域诗歌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信