Effects of complex-descending versus traditional resistance training on physical fitness abilities of female team sports athletes

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Biomedical Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2478/bhk-2023-0018

Aparna Rathi, D. Sharma, R. Thapa

{"title":"Effects of complex-descending versus traditional resistance training on physical fitness abilities of female team sports athletes","authors":"Aparna Rathi, D. Sharma, R. Thapa","doi":"10.2478/bhk-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study aim: The study compared the effects of six weeks of complex-descending training (CDT), traditional resistance training (RT), and sport-specific training (i.e., active control group [CG]) on measures of physical fitness. Material and methods: Thirty-one female team sport athletes were randomly assigned to either the CDT group (n = 11), the RT group (n = 10), or the CG (n = 10), and were assessed before and after intervention for linear sprint (10 m and 30 m), change of direction sprint (CODS), standing long jump (SLJ), running based anerobic sprint test (peak power, average power), resting heart rate, Cooper 12-min run test, and body fat percentage. Results: ANCOVA with baseline scores as covariates revealed significant between-group differences for 10 m and 30 m linear sprint, CODS, SLJ, and Cooper 12-min run test after the intervention. The further post-hoc tests revealed significant differences between CDT and CG in 10 m and 30 m sprints, CODS and SLJ, with results favoring CDT, and between RT and CG in 10 m linear sprint and Cooper 12-min run test, with results favoring RT. However, no significant differences were observed between CDT and RT in any dependent variable. Conclusion: CDT is effective in improving 10 m and 30 m linear sprints, CODS, and SLJ compared to CG, and RT is effective in improving 10 m sprint and Cooper 12-min run test compared to CG. Therefore, supplementing sport-specific training with either CDT or RT may offer additional benefits in improving specific physical fitness abilities of female team-sport athletes.","PeriodicalId":44223,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","volume":"77 6 1","pages":"148 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2023-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Study aim: The study compared the effects of six weeks of complex-descending training (CDT), traditional resistance training (RT), and sport-specific training (i.e., active control group [CG]) on measures of physical fitness. Material and methods: Thirty-one female team sport athletes were randomly assigned to either the CDT group (n = 11), the RT group (n = 10), or the CG (n = 10), and were assessed before and after intervention for linear sprint (10 m and 30 m), change of direction sprint (CODS), standing long jump (SLJ), running based anerobic sprint test (peak power, average power), resting heart rate, Cooper 12-min run test, and body fat percentage. Results: ANCOVA with baseline scores as covariates revealed significant between-group differences for 10 m and 30 m linear sprint, CODS, SLJ, and Cooper 12-min run test after the intervention. The further post-hoc tests revealed significant differences between CDT and CG in 10 m and 30 m sprints, CODS and SLJ, with results favoring CDT, and between RT and CG in 10 m linear sprint and Cooper 12-min run test, with results favoring RT. However, no significant differences were observed between CDT and RT in any dependent variable. Conclusion: CDT is effective in improving 10 m and 30 m linear sprints, CODS, and SLJ compared to CG, and RT is effective in improving 10 m sprint and Cooper 12-min run test compared to CG. Therefore, supplementing sport-specific training with either CDT or RT may offer additional benefits in improving specific physical fitness abilities of female team-sport athletes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

复杂下降与传统阻力训练对女子团体运动运动员体能能力的影响

摘要:研究目的:本研究比较了6周复杂下降训练(CDT)、传统阻力训练(RT)和运动专项训练(即积极对照组[CG])对身体健康指标的影响。材料与方法:将31名女子团体运动运动员随机分为CDT组(n = 11)、RT组(n = 10)和CG组(n = 10)，在干预前后分别进行线性冲刺(10米和30米)、转向冲刺(CODS)、立定跳远(SLJ)、基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试(峰值功率、平均功率)、静息心率、Cooper 12分钟跑测试和体脂率的评估。结果:以基线评分为协变量的ANCOVA显示，干预后10米和30米线性冲刺、CODS、SLJ和Cooper 12分钟跑测试组间差异显著。进一步的事后检验显示，CDT和CG在10米和30米短跑、CODS和SLJ中有显著差异，结果有利于CDT，而RT和CG在10米线性短跑和Cooper 12分钟跑步试验中有显著差异，结果有利于RT。然而，CDT和RT在任何因变量中均无显著差异。结论:CDT对10米、30米直线冲刺、CODS、SLJ较CG有改善作用，RT对10米冲刺、Cooper 12分钟跑试验较CG有改善作用。因此，用CDT或RT补充运动专项训练可能会在提高女性团队运动运动员的特定体能能力方面提供额外的好处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biomedical Human Kinetics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： The leading idea is the health-directed quality of life. The journal thus covers many biomedical areas related to physical activity, e.g. physiology, biochemistry, biomechanics, anthropology, medical issues associated with physical activities, physical and motor development, psychological and sociological issues associated with physical activities, rehabilitation, health-related sport issues and fitness, etc.