THE EFFECT OF SIMULATION ON NURSING STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE ABOUT COLOSTOMY IRRIGATION: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Q2 Nursing

Texto Contexto Enfermagem Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-0011en

Silvia Kalyma Paiva Lucena, Luana Souza Freitas, Isabelle Pereira da Silva, Simone Karine da Costa Mesquita, Julliana Fernandes de Sena, A. C. D. S. Oliveira, R. D. O. E. Araújo, I. F. Costa

{"title":"THE EFFECT OF SIMULATION ON NURSING STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE ABOUT COLOSTOMY IRRIGATION: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY","authors":"Silvia Kalyma Paiva Lucena, Luana Souza Freitas, Isabelle Pereira da Silva, Simone Karine da Costa Mesquita, Julliana Fernandes de Sena, A. C. D. S. Oliveira, R. D. O. E. Araújo, I. F. Costa","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-0011en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effect of clinical simulation and of a lectured class on Nursing students' knowledge about the colostomy irrigation procedure. Method: a quasi-experimental study conducted in September 2019 with Nursing students attending Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte in Natal, Brazil. The instruments used were a questionnaire targeted at sociodemographic issues and a knowledge analysis tool at three different moments. The Control Group had a lectured class and the Intervention Group took part in the laboratory simulation. The Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney tests were used for data analysis. Results: no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the sociodemographic profile. In the analysis of the means of correct answers, better measures were observed in the post-test of both groups when compared to the pre-test; however, in the retention test, the students from the Intervention Group had better and statistically significant results than those from the Control Group (p-value=0.015). Conclusion: it is noticed that both teaching strategies exerted a positive effect on the students' learning process. Although both are equally important and effective, simulation showed better performance in knowledge retention. It is expected that this research enables educators to reflect on their work and allows them to use strategies that enhance their teaching practice, in order to benefit teaching and the students' development.","PeriodicalId":51188,"journal":{"name":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-0011en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effect of clinical simulation and of a lectured class on Nursing students' knowledge about the colostomy irrigation procedure. Method: a quasi-experimental study conducted in September 2019 with Nursing students attending Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte in Natal, Brazil. The instruments used were a questionnaire targeted at sociodemographic issues and a knowledge analysis tool at three different moments. The Control Group had a lectured class and the Intervention Group took part in the laboratory simulation. The Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney tests were used for data analysis. Results: no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the sociodemographic profile. In the analysis of the means of correct answers, better measures were observed in the post-test of both groups when compared to the pre-test; however, in the retention test, the students from the Intervention Group had better and statistically significant results than those from the Control Group (p-value=0.015). Conclusion: it is noticed that both teaching strategies exerted a positive effect on the students' learning process. Although both are equally important and effective, simulation showed better performance in knowledge retention. It is expected that this research enables educators to reflect on their work and allows them to use strategies that enhance their teaching practice, in order to benefit teaching and the students' development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

模拟对护生结肠造口灌洗知识的影响:一项准实验研究

【摘要】目的:比较临床模拟与课堂讲授对护生结肠造口灌洗术知识的影响。方法:于2019年9月在巴西纳塔尔省北里奥格兰德联邦大学的护理专业学生中进行准实验研究。所使用的工具是针对社会人口问题的问卷调查和三个不同时刻的知识分析工具。对照组进行授课，干预组进行实验室模拟。采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行数据分析。结果:在社会人口统计方面，各组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在正确率均值分析中，两组的后测结果均优于前测;然而，在记忆测试中，干预组学生的成绩优于对照组，且有统计学意义(p值=0.015)。结论:两种教学策略对学生的学习过程都有积极的影响。虽然两者同样重要和有效，但模拟在知识保留方面表现得更好。期望本研究能使教育工作者反思他们的工作，并使他们能够运用策略来提高他们的教学实践，以有利于教学和学生的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Texto Contexto Enfermagem Nursing-General Nursing

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Texto & Contexto Enfermagem provides space for reflection and deepening of knowledge about issues of practice, teaching and research in health and nursing, at national and international levels. The journal is published quarterly in the rolling pass or Continuous flow mode, accepting manuscripts in Portuguese, English or Spanish, in the categories original article, reflection, experience report and review. Contributions designated to the dissemination of unpublished original research results are prioritized for publication. Special issues are published at the discretion of the Board of Directors and Associate Editors. All manuscripts are published in two versions, one of which is English, aiming to cover the largest number of readers worldwide. The editorial policy of Texto & Contexto Enfermagem is based on rigorous quality criteria for indexing and publishing (including technical and normative aspects, graphic and textual quality and excellence in scientific content); on responsibility for shared management between the Board of Directors, Editorial Board and Internal and External Editors Associates; and on the rigorous and constructive peer review, preserving the anonymity of authors and reviewers (double blinded).