Medication Adherence, Persistence and Cost in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Oral vs Parenteral Treatment

F. Santoleri, R. Lasala, Andrea Logreco, M. Hassani, A. Costantini
{"title":"Medication Adherence, Persistence and Cost in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Oral vs Parenteral Treatment","authors":"F. Santoleri, R. Lasala, Andrea Logreco, M. Hassani, A. Costantini","doi":"10.15344/2394-1502/2016/117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the medication adherence of MS patients to oral and parenteral self-administration therapy. The secondary outcome was to study how the adherence varies respect of the length of treatment and calculate the daily cost of therapy. The adherence was evaluated by the ratio between the Received Daily Dose (RDD) and the Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD); the persistence to treatment was plotted with the Kaplan Meier method. The daily cost of theraphy was calculated as cost per RDD. The adherence in function of time was calculated using 30 days intervals. The average adherence values were 0.91 for Avonex, 0.81 for Rebif®, 0.83 for Betaferon®, 0.81 for Extavia®, 0.90 for Copaxone®, 0.89 for Gilenya®, 0.83 for Aubagio®. The persistence on 3 years of therapy was 64% for Rebif®, 62% for Betaferon®, 58% for Gilenya®, 48% for Copaxone®, 45% for Avonex. As regards the variation of adherence in function of time, it shows up that after a year of treatment, the adherence values was stabilized at about 0.9 for Gilenya®, Copaxone® and Avonex, and between 0.8 and 0.85 for Rebif®, Betaferon® and Extavia®. The cost of the daily treatment ranges from a minimum of € 13.66 for Betaferon® to a maximum of 44 € for Gilenya®. The comparison of oral therapy and the injection one showed no significant differences, underlining that in the case of Multiple Sclerosis, oral formulation does not represent a parameter in favour of the adherence to treatment. To equal levels of adherence it is not justifiable the higher cost of fingolimod compared to all other analysed treatments.","PeriodicalId":90866,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-1502/2016/117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the medication adherence of MS patients to oral and parenteral self-administration therapy. The secondary outcome was to study how the adherence varies respect of the length of treatment and calculate the daily cost of therapy. The adherence was evaluated by the ratio between the Received Daily Dose (RDD) and the Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD); the persistence to treatment was plotted with the Kaplan Meier method. The daily cost of theraphy was calculated as cost per RDD. The adherence in function of time was calculated using 30 days intervals. The average adherence values were 0.91 for Avonex, 0.81 for Rebif®, 0.83 for Betaferon®, 0.81 for Extavia®, 0.90 for Copaxone®, 0.89 for Gilenya®, 0.83 for Aubagio®. The persistence on 3 years of therapy was 64% for Rebif®, 62% for Betaferon®, 58% for Gilenya®, 48% for Copaxone®, 45% for Avonex. As regards the variation of adherence in function of time, it shows up that after a year of treatment, the adherence values was stabilized at about 0.9 for Gilenya®, Copaxone® and Avonex, and between 0.8 and 0.85 for Rebif®, Betaferon® and Extavia®. The cost of the daily treatment ranges from a minimum of € 13.66 for Betaferon® to a maximum of 44 € for Gilenya®. The comparison of oral therapy and the injection one showed no significant differences, underlining that in the case of Multiple Sclerosis, oral formulation does not represent a parameter in favour of the adherence to treatment. To equal levels of adherence it is not justifiable the higher cost of fingolimod compared to all other analysed treatments.
多发性硬化症患者的药物依从性、持久性和成本:口服与非肠外治疗
本研究的主要目的是评估MS患者对口服和肠外自我给药治疗的药物依从性。次要结果是研究依从性如何随治疗时间的长短而变化,并计算每日治疗费用。采用每日剂量(RDD)与处方每日剂量(PDD)之比评价依从性;治疗持续时间用Kaplan Meier法绘制。每日治疗费用以每RDD的费用计算。以30 d为时间间隔计算依从性与时间的关系。Avonex的平均依从性值为0.91,Rebif®为0.81,Betaferon®为0.83,Extavia®为0.81,Copaxone®为0.90,Gilenya®为0.89,Aubagio®为0.83。3年治疗的持续时间为瑞比夫®64%,倍他龙®62%,吉列雅®58%,科帕松®48%,艾伏尼克斯45%。关于依从性随时间的变化,结果显示,治疗一年后,Gilenya®,Copaxone®和Avonex的依从性值稳定在0.9左右,而Rebif®,Betaferon®和Extavia®的依从性值在0.8 - 0.85之间。每日治疗费用从Betaferon®的最低13.66欧元到Gilenya®的最高44欧元不等。口服治疗和注射治疗的比较没有显示出显著差异,强调在多发性硬化症的情况下,口服制剂并不代表一个有利于坚持治疗的参数。为了达到相同的依从性水平,与所有其他分析的治疗方法相比,芬戈莫德的成本更高是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信