Carving Status at Kŭmgangsan: Elite Graffiti in Premodern Korea by Maya K. H. Stiller (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Youenhee Kho
{"title":"Carving Status at Kŭmgangsan: Elite Graffiti in Premodern Korea by Maya K. H. Stiller (review)","authors":"Youenhee Kho","doi":"10.18399/acta.2023.26.1.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carving Status at Kŭmgangsan is the fruit of Maya Stiller’s dedicated fieldwork at Kŭmgangsan 金剛山, traditionally believed to be the most beautiful site on the Korean Peninsula, but inaccessible to South Koreans due to its location in North Korea. Stiller surveyed the entire mountain twice, photographing more than five thousand carved inscriptions and identifying the majority of carved autographs by cross-referencing a variety of written documentation in order to map the location and time when the carvings were made. She had originally intended to examine Buddhist remains at and religious pilgrimages to Kŭmgangsan. However, the rock carvings she found throughout the mountain and the inscription a scholar left beside a statue of Buddha which was popular with Chosŏn Confucian scholars (p. 53–57) led her to change her focus to the secular motivations of late Chosŏn travelers to Kŭmgangsan. Drawing on Michel Foucault and Edward Soja, she suggests in the introduction that Kŭmgangsan may have been “a heterotopia” or a “third place” during the premodern period of Korea, serving as a counter-place to the class-controlled society of Chosŏn. She also applies Pierre Nora’s concept of “memory site” to the places at Kŭmgangsan where travelers left their autographic inscriptions.1 Stiller investigates how much a trip to Kŭmgangsan cost and how such trips were financed. According to her analysis, the cost was one-third of what it would take to feed a family for a year (p. 22), and the successful completion of such a costly trip depended on a traveler’s social status. This focus on money, social class, and individual desire for selfexpression, together with insights into material culture, are remarkable in that it overcomes the limitations of previous research which has generally not looked at Kŭmgangsan from this perspective. This is due to the fact that Kŭmgangsan took on a sacredness under Japanese colonial rule in the early twentieth century, as shown in Ode to Kŭmgang (Kŭmgang yech’an, 金剛 禮讚) by Ch’oe Namsŏn (1924) and many paintings of Kŭmgang-san by Ko Huidong during 1930s and it has since become a special, forbidden place in the collective South Korean","PeriodicalId":42297,"journal":{"name":"Acta Koreana","volume":"5 1","pages":"177 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Koreana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18399/acta.2023.26.1.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carving Status at Kŭmgangsan is the fruit of Maya Stiller’s dedicated fieldwork at Kŭmgangsan 金剛山, traditionally believed to be the most beautiful site on the Korean Peninsula, but inaccessible to South Koreans due to its location in North Korea. Stiller surveyed the entire mountain twice, photographing more than five thousand carved inscriptions and identifying the majority of carved autographs by cross-referencing a variety of written documentation in order to map the location and time when the carvings were made. She had originally intended to examine Buddhist remains at and religious pilgrimages to Kŭmgangsan. However, the rock carvings she found throughout the mountain and the inscription a scholar left beside a statue of Buddha which was popular with Chosŏn Confucian scholars (p. 53–57) led her to change her focus to the secular motivations of late Chosŏn travelers to Kŭmgangsan. Drawing on Michel Foucault and Edward Soja, she suggests in the introduction that Kŭmgangsan may have been “a heterotopia” or a “third place” during the premodern period of Korea, serving as a counter-place to the class-controlled society of Chosŏn. She also applies Pierre Nora’s concept of “memory site” to the places at Kŭmgangsan where travelers left their autographic inscriptions.1 Stiller investigates how much a trip to Kŭmgangsan cost and how such trips were financed. According to her analysis, the cost was one-third of what it would take to feed a family for a year (p. 22), and the successful completion of such a costly trip depended on a traveler’s social status. This focus on money, social class, and individual desire for selfexpression, together with insights into material culture, are remarkable in that it overcomes the limitations of previous research which has generally not looked at Kŭmgangsan from this perspective. This is due to the fact that Kŭmgangsan took on a sacredness under Japanese colonial rule in the early twentieth century, as shown in Ode to Kŭmgang (Kŭmgang yech’an, 金剛 禮讚) by Ch’oe Namsŏn (1924) and many paintings of Kŭmgang-san by Ko Huidong during 1930s and it has since become a special, forbidden place in the collective South Korean
雕塑现状Kŭmgangsan:玛雅·k·h·斯蒂勒(Maya K. H. Stiller)的前现代韩国精英涂鸦(回顾)
Kŭmgangsan的雕刻状态是玛雅·斯蒂勒在Kŭmgangsan的专门田野工作的成果,传统上被认为是朝鲜半岛最美丽的地方,但由于它在朝鲜的位置,韩国人无法进入。斯蒂勒对整座山进行了两次调查,拍摄了5000多幅雕刻的铭文,并通过交叉参考各种书面文件来确定大多数雕刻的签名,以便绘制雕刻的地点和时间。她原本打算在Kŭmgangsan检查佛教遗迹和宗教朝圣。然而,她在整个山上发现的岩石雕刻和一位学者留下的碑文(在Chosŏn儒家学者中很受欢迎)使她把注意力转向了最近Chosŏn前往Kŭmgangsan的旅行者的世俗动机。她以米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)和爱德华·索贾(Edward Soja)为基础,在引言中提出,Kŭmgangsan可能是韩国前现代时期的“异托邦”或“第三个地方”,与Chosŏn的阶级控制社会相对立。她还将皮埃尔·诺拉的“记忆地点”概念应用于Kŭmgangsan网站上旅行者留下亲笔题词的地方斯蒂勒调查了一次去Kŭmgangsan的旅行要花多少钱,以及这些旅行的资金来源。根据她的分析,这次旅行的花费是一个家庭一年所需食物的三分之一(第22页),而成功完成如此昂贵的旅行取决于旅行者的社会地位。这种对金钱、社会阶层和个人自我表达欲望的关注,以及对物质文化的洞察,是值得注意的,因为它克服了以往研究的局限性,这些研究通常没有从这个角度来看待Kŭmgangsan。这是因为在20世纪初的日本殖民统治下,Kŭmgangsan被赋予了神圣的地位,如赤叶Namsŏn(1924年)的《致Kŭmgang》(Kŭmgang yech ' s, jinjin)和高惠东在20世纪30年代的许多画作《致Kŭmgang-san》,从此成为韩国集体的一个特殊的禁区
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Koreana
Acta Koreana ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信