Ensayar desde el pensamiento retrospectivo: la multifotografía como metáfora del entrelazamiento entre ensayo, memoria y ficción en La invención de la soledad de Paul Auster
{"title":"Ensayar desde el pensamiento retrospectivo: la multifotografía como metáfora del entrelazamiento entre ensayo, memoria y ficción en La invención de la soledad de Paul Auster","authors":"E. Aguirre","doi":"10.15517/h.v10i1.39985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente articulo tiene por objeto establecer un tipo de lazo entre ensayo, memoria y ficcion. Intentaremos demostrar que su entrelazamiento no sucede unicamente porque la prosa se ficcionaliza puesto que el recuerdo es sospechoso y poco confiable (lugar comun de la critica), sino mas bien porque quien ensaya desde la memoria mistifica su objeto de estudio, multiplicandolo como quien pone dos espejos frente a frente, presentando la imagen multiplicada bajo la apariencia de la vivencia personal. Para ello, en primer lugar, indagaremos la proximidad entre ensayo y memoir; posteriormente, daremos cuenta de la manera en que se activa la escritura ensayistica a traves del recuerdo difuso y la memoria reconstruida; finalmente, como evidencia de nuestra premisa, mostraremos como se lleva a cabo este hecho en “Retrato de un hombre invisible” del norteamericano Paul Auster. EnglishThe purpose of this article is to establish a certain type of relationship between essay, memory and fiction. We will demonstrate that this particular combination doesn´t happen exclusively because prose is fictionalized since the writer’s memory is suspicious and unreliable (common place of criticism), that is to say that whoever engages in essayistic writing from memory tends to mystify its object of study, multiplying it as who puts two mirrors face to face, presenting the image multiplied under the appearance of personal experience. In order to do this, first we will inspect the proximity between essay and memoir’s; afterwards, we will exhibit the way in which essay writing is activated through diffuse and reconstructed memory. In the end, as evidence to our premise, we will attest how this is done in “Portrait of an Invisible Man” by American writer Paul Auster.","PeriodicalId":40128,"journal":{"name":"Revista Humanidades","volume":"26 1","pages":"68-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/h.v10i1.39985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEl presente articulo tiene por objeto establecer un tipo de lazo entre ensayo, memoria y ficcion. Intentaremos demostrar que su entrelazamiento no sucede unicamente porque la prosa se ficcionaliza puesto que el recuerdo es sospechoso y poco confiable (lugar comun de la critica), sino mas bien porque quien ensaya desde la memoria mistifica su objeto de estudio, multiplicandolo como quien pone dos espejos frente a frente, presentando la imagen multiplicada bajo la apariencia de la vivencia personal. Para ello, en primer lugar, indagaremos la proximidad entre ensayo y memoir; posteriormente, daremos cuenta de la manera en que se activa la escritura ensayistica a traves del recuerdo difuso y la memoria reconstruida; finalmente, como evidencia de nuestra premisa, mostraremos como se lleva a cabo este hecho en “Retrato de un hombre invisible” del norteamericano Paul Auster. EnglishThe purpose of this article is to establish a certain type of relationship between essay, memory and fiction. We will demonstrate that this particular combination doesn´t happen exclusively because prose is fictionalized since the writer’s memory is suspicious and unreliable (common place of criticism), that is to say that whoever engages in essayistic writing from memory tends to mystify its object of study, multiplying it as who puts two mirrors face to face, presenting the image multiplied under the appearance of personal experience. In order to do this, first we will inspect the proximity between essay and memoir’s; afterwards, we will exhibit the way in which essay writing is activated through diffuse and reconstructed memory. In the end, as evidence to our premise, we will attest how this is done in “Portrait of an Invisible Man” by American writer Paul Auster.
这篇文章的目的是在散文、记忆和小说之间建立一种联系。我们将试着证明交错情况不只是因为发生的散文ficcionaliza因为共同记忆是怀疑和不可靠(批评),而是更因为从记忆的检视他的研究对象,multiplicandolo像介绍,可以把两个镜子面对面multiplicada形象外表下的个人。在这篇文章中,我们将探讨记忆与散文之间的关系。在此之后,我们将解释散文式写作是如何通过模糊记忆和重建记忆来激活的;最后,作为我们前提的证据,我们将在美国保罗·奥斯特的《隐形人的肖像》中展示这一事实是如何发生的。这篇文章的目的是在散文、记忆和小说之间建立一种关系。我们将证明,这包括过分doesn t´发生exclusively普罗斯由于is以来fictionalized the writer ' s memory is应对and unreliable (common place of批评声音,that is to say that whoever engages in from memory日essayistic writing to mystify its object of study, multiplying it as who puts two mirrors face to face,印有the image个人multiplied under the appearance of experience。为了做到这一点,我们首先要检查论文和回忆录之间的关系;afterwards, we will exhibit the way in which essay writing is activated通过diffuse和reconstructed memory。In the end, as证据to our premise, we will attest how this is捐“Portrait of an Invisible Man”by Paul Auster American writer。