PATHOLOGY AND DISCRETE TYPING UNIT ASSOCIATIONS OF TRYPANOSOMA CRUZI INFECTION IN COYOTES (CANIS LATRANS) AND RACCOONS (PROCYON LOTOR) OF TEXAS, USA

C. Hodo, R. Bañuelos, Erin E. Edwards, E. Wozniak, S. Hamer
{"title":"PATHOLOGY AND DISCRETE TYPING UNIT ASSOCIATIONS OF TRYPANOSOMA CRUZI INFECTION IN COYOTES (CANIS LATRANS) AND RACCOONS (PROCYON LOTOR) OF TEXAS, USA","authors":"C. Hodo, R. Bañuelos, Erin E. Edwards, E. Wozniak, S. Hamer","doi":"10.7589/2019-03-071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Trypanosoma cruzi is a vector-borne, protozoal parasite of mammals. Infected humans, dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), and nonhuman primates may remain asymptomatic or may develop Chagas disease, most commonly characterized by lymphoplasmacytic myocarditis with myocardial degeneration and fibrosis, ultimately resulting in heart failure. Although wildlife species have important roles as sylvatic reservoirs, investigations into the pathology of T. cruzi in wildlife are limited to a few studies documenting histologic lesions in opossums (Didelphis spp.) and raccoons (Procyon lotor). Pathology in coyotes (Canis latrans) has not, to our knowledge, been described, despite their recognition as a reservoir and close genetic relationship to domestic dogs. Our objectives were to perform a detailed, comparative cardiac pathology study of sympatric, naturally infected coyotes and raccoons, to characterize the overall T. cruzi infection prevalence in the heart and blood of each species via PCR, and to identify infecting discrete typing units (DTUs). We sampled hunter-harvested coyotes (n=120) and raccoons (n=24) in a 28 county region of central and south Texas, US. Raccoons were significantly more likely to have positive PCR results (P<0.001) with a prevalence of 62% (15/24), comprising DTU TcIV exclusively, with mild to no evidence of cardiac pathology. In contrast, coyotes had a lower infection prevalence (8%, 10/120), comprising DTU TcI exclusively, with lymphoplasmacytic myocarditis observed in four of the six PCR-positive animals. Many raccoons had PCR-positive blood and heart tissue simultaneously, supporting previous reports that raccoons maintain parasitemia into chronic stages of infection; in contrast, none of the PCR-positive coyotes were positive in both heart and blood. Our findings demonstrate marked differences in T. cruzi infection dynamics between coyotes and raccoons, with important implications for reservoir potential and their role in transmission cycles.","PeriodicalId":22805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":"123 1 1","pages":"134 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/2019-03-071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract: Trypanosoma cruzi is a vector-borne, protozoal parasite of mammals. Infected humans, dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), and nonhuman primates may remain asymptomatic or may develop Chagas disease, most commonly characterized by lymphoplasmacytic myocarditis with myocardial degeneration and fibrosis, ultimately resulting in heart failure. Although wildlife species have important roles as sylvatic reservoirs, investigations into the pathology of T. cruzi in wildlife are limited to a few studies documenting histologic lesions in opossums (Didelphis spp.) and raccoons (Procyon lotor). Pathology in coyotes (Canis latrans) has not, to our knowledge, been described, despite their recognition as a reservoir and close genetic relationship to domestic dogs. Our objectives were to perform a detailed, comparative cardiac pathology study of sympatric, naturally infected coyotes and raccoons, to characterize the overall T. cruzi infection prevalence in the heart and blood of each species via PCR, and to identify infecting discrete typing units (DTUs). We sampled hunter-harvested coyotes (n=120) and raccoons (n=24) in a 28 county region of central and south Texas, US. Raccoons were significantly more likely to have positive PCR results (P<0.001) with a prevalence of 62% (15/24), comprising DTU TcIV exclusively, with mild to no evidence of cardiac pathology. In contrast, coyotes had a lower infection prevalence (8%, 10/120), comprising DTU TcI exclusively, with lymphoplasmacytic myocarditis observed in four of the six PCR-positive animals. Many raccoons had PCR-positive blood and heart tissue simultaneously, supporting previous reports that raccoons maintain parasitemia into chronic stages of infection; in contrast, none of the PCR-positive coyotes were positive in both heart and blood. Our findings demonstrate marked differences in T. cruzi infection dynamics between coyotes and raccoons, with important implications for reservoir potential and their role in transmission cycles.
美国德克萨斯州土狼(canis latrans)和浣熊(procyon lotor)克氏锥虫感染的病理和离散分型单位相关性
摘要克氏锥虫是一种媒介传播的哺乳动物原生动物寄生虫。受感染的人类、狗(犬狼疮)和非人类灵长类动物可能保持无症状或可能发展为恰加斯病,最常见的特征是淋巴浆细胞性心肌炎伴心肌变性和纤维化,最终导致心力衰竭。尽管野生物种在森林宿主中扮演着重要的角色,但对野生动物克氏锥虫的病理学研究仅限于在负鼠(Didelphis spp.)和浣熊(Procyon lotor)中记录组织学病变的少数研究。据我们所知,郊狼(Canis latrans)的病理学还没有被描述过,尽管它们被认为是一个宿主,并且与家养狗有密切的遗传关系。我们的目标是对同域自然感染的土狼和浣熊进行详细的心脏病理学比较研究,通过PCR表征每个物种心脏和血液中的总体克氏弓形虫感染流行率,并确定感染的离散分型单位(dtu)。我们在美国德克萨斯州中部和南部的28个县地区取样了狩猎收获的土狼(n=120)和浣熊(n=24)。浣熊更容易出现PCR阳性结果(P<0.001),患病率为62%(15/24),仅包括DTU TcIV,有轻微或无心脏病理证据。相比之下,郊狼的感染率较低(8%,10/120),仅包括DTU TcI,在6只pcr阳性动物中有4只观察到淋巴浆细胞性心肌炎。许多浣熊的血液和心脏组织同时呈pcr阳性,这支持了之前的报道,即浣熊将寄生虫血症维持到感染的慢性阶段;相比之下,没有一只pcr阳性的土狼在心脏和血液中都呈阳性。我们的研究结果表明,在土狼和浣熊之间,克氏t型虫感染动力学存在显著差异,这对水库潜力及其在传播周期中的作用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信