{"title":"The Little Prince: The Big Lesson","authors":"Vineet Gairola","doi":"10.56011/mind-mri-114-202211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Little Prince, a theoretical parable in itself, is capable of evoking emotions \nrelated to oneself and the societal fabric of existence in an eloquent manner. This \nresearch paper talks about The Little Prince in terms of childhood, identity, and society \nin the Indian context. How being busy in modern times is confounded with being \nproductive is questioned in this paper. The notion of how development is usually \nunderstood is problematic. It is important to understand that a child is not something \nto be raised. Only learning from experience, freedom, and responsibility is to be fostered. \nThe Little Prince takes us from formality to authenticity. The way of the little prince is \nnot philosophy. His way of life is philosia, where philo means “love” and ousia means \n“truth.” The Little Prince reminds us that truth is not an escape, but rather the \nawareness of escape.It is to be noted that childhood as a cultural construction comes \nout to be a human choice, and the consciousness of childhood comes out to be cultural. \nMuch of childhood remains ununderstood in terms of playing and balancing the \ncathartic threads of psychoanalysis, culture, and society. Through a psychosocial lens, \nthis paper sheds light on how something hidden is always hyper-present, presenting \nitself by showing what it shows.","PeriodicalId":35394,"journal":{"name":"Mind and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-114-202211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Little Prince, a theoretical parable in itself, is capable of evoking emotions
related to oneself and the societal fabric of existence in an eloquent manner. This
research paper talks about The Little Prince in terms of childhood, identity, and society
in the Indian context. How being busy in modern times is confounded with being
productive is questioned in this paper. The notion of how development is usually
understood is problematic. It is important to understand that a child is not something
to be raised. Only learning from experience, freedom, and responsibility is to be fostered.
The Little Prince takes us from formality to authenticity. The way of the little prince is
not philosophy. His way of life is philosia, where philo means “love” and ousia means
“truth.” The Little Prince reminds us that truth is not an escape, but rather the
awareness of escape.It is to be noted that childhood as a cultural construction comes
out to be a human choice, and the consciousness of childhood comes out to be cultural.
Much of childhood remains ununderstood in terms of playing and balancing the
cathartic threads of psychoanalysis, culture, and society. Through a psychosocial lens,
this paper sheds light on how something hidden is always hyper-present, presenting
itself by showing what it shows.
期刊介绍:
Mind & Society is a journal for ideas, explorations, investigations and discussions on the interaction between the human mind and the societal environments. Scholars from all fields of inquiry who entertain and examine various aspects of these interactions are warmly invited to submit their work. The journal welcomes case studies, theoretical analysis and modeling, data analysis and reports (quantitative and qualitative) that can offer insight into existing frameworks or offer views and reason for the promise of new directions for the study of interaction between the mind and the society. The potential contributors are particularly encouraged to carefully consider the impact of their work on societal functions in private and public sectors, and to dedicate part of their discussion to an explicit clarification of such, existing or potential, implications.Officially cited as: Mind Soc