Orthodoxy and Customs the Basic Sources of Sadism: A Psychoanalysis of the Caretaker

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Muntazar Mahdi, Muhammad Sher Ali Khan, S. Rasool
{"title":"Orthodoxy and Customs the Basic Sources of Sadism: A Psychoanalysis of the Caretaker","authors":"Muntazar Mahdi, Muhammad Sher Ali Khan, S. Rasool","doi":"10.34154/2020-ASSJ-0202-24-32/EURAASS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary world, humans in social context recurrently ascend against the deliberate and inadvertent occurrences as they fall debilitated intellectually and experience the antagonistic effects of social issues. The current research paper tries to bring up the purposes for sadism issue with exceptional reference to social part of people's life, thinking about society and specialists as main thrusts behind pretty much every dejection by means of putting on Freud’s psychoanalytic assumption about mental issues (yet through a minute unorthodoxy) on an emotional character made from Pinter’s imagination in “The Caretaker”. This descriptive study highlights the core area of human life with respect to sadism and orthodoxy from the content of the play. The content has been undertaken to investigate, decipher and evaluate with reference to Freudian viewpoint in order to open up people's enormous job of making sadism issue within society through pushing them to choke themselves in specific manners. The study brings forth the feature that the communication gap and loneness is one of the major reasons of sadism and orthodoxy.","PeriodicalId":36474,"journal":{"name":"Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34154/2020-ASSJ-0202-24-32/EURAASS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary world, humans in social context recurrently ascend against the deliberate and inadvertent occurrences as they fall debilitated intellectually and experience the antagonistic effects of social issues. The current research paper tries to bring up the purposes for sadism issue with exceptional reference to social part of people's life, thinking about society and specialists as main thrusts behind pretty much every dejection by means of putting on Freud’s psychoanalytic assumption about mental issues (yet through a minute unorthodoxy) on an emotional character made from Pinter’s imagination in “The Caretaker”. This descriptive study highlights the core area of human life with respect to sadism and orthodoxy from the content of the play. The content has been undertaken to investigate, decipher and evaluate with reference to Freudian viewpoint in order to open up people's enormous job of making sadism issue within society through pushing them to choke themselves in specific manners. The study brings forth the feature that the communication gap and loneness is one of the major reasons of sadism and orthodoxy.
正统与习俗:施虐的基本来源:对看守人的精神分析
在当今世界,处于社会语境中的人类,在智力衰弱和经历社会问题的对抗效应的过程中,不断地在蓄意和无意的事件中上升。目前的研究论文试图通过对人们生活中社会部分的特殊参考,将社会和专家视为几乎每一次沮丧背后的主要推动力,通过将弗洛伊德关于精神问题的精神分析假设(但通过一分钟的非正统)放在品特在“看护者”中想象的情感角色上。这个描述性的研究突出了人类生活的核心领域,从内容的虐待狂和正统。内容是根据弗洛伊德的观点进行调查、解读和评估,以打开人们的巨大工作,通过推动他们以特定的方式扼杀自己,在社会中制造虐待狂问题。研究发现,沟通缺口和孤独感是虐恋和正统的主要原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies
Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信