Biofilm formation in cutaneous wounds and its behavior in the face of interventions: an integrative review

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
E. Borges, J. Spira, Gilmara Lopes Amorim, Ana Carolina Silva Martins Coelho
{"title":"Biofilm formation in cutaneous wounds and its behavior in the face of interventions: an integrative review","authors":"E. Borges, J. Spira, Gilmara Lopes Amorim, Ana Carolina Silva Martins Coelho","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20222378112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to identify in the literature the biofilm formation and its behavior when faced with interventions in cutaneous wounds. Methods: an integrative review, carried out in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, EMBASE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library Collaboration, MEDLINE/PubMed and Science Direct databases, without temporal delimitation. Nineteen studies were selected. The information was evaluated descriptively, comparing it with the pertinent findings. Results: the sample studies were published in English and included three types of biofilm research: two clinical, six in vitro and 11 in vivo (animal). Three themes were included: biofilm model creation (n=4), biofilm assessment (n=3), biofilm behavior before interventions for its management (n=12). Conclusion: the detrimental effects of biofilm on wound healing have been confirmed. Several interventions were able to reduce and eliminate biofilm in in vitro and in vivo models. Contributions to practice: it was found that clinical evaluation of the lesion does not allow the identification of biofilm, even when present; it is below the surface of the lesion. This finding raises reflection on the part of nurses regarding the interventions adopted for the removal of biofilm.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222378112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to identify in the literature the biofilm formation and its behavior when faced with interventions in cutaneous wounds. Methods: an integrative review, carried out in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, EMBASE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library Collaboration, MEDLINE/PubMed and Science Direct databases, without temporal delimitation. Nineteen studies were selected. The information was evaluated descriptively, comparing it with the pertinent findings. Results: the sample studies were published in English and included three types of biofilm research: two clinical, six in vitro and 11 in vivo (animal). Three themes were included: biofilm model creation (n=4), biofilm assessment (n=3), biofilm behavior before interventions for its management (n=12). Conclusion: the detrimental effects of biofilm on wound healing have been confirmed. Several interventions were able to reduce and eliminate biofilm in in vitro and in vivo models. Contributions to practice: it was found that clinical evaluation of the lesion does not allow the identification of biofilm, even when present; it is below the surface of the lesion. This finding raises reflection on the part of nurses regarding the interventions adopted for the removal of biofilm.
生物膜在皮肤伤口的形成及其行为在面对干预:一个综合回顾
目的:从文献中了解皮肤创面生物膜的形成及其在干预下的行为。方法:在护理和相关健康文献累积索引、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献、EMBASE、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆协作、MEDLINE/PubMed和Science Direct数据库中进行综合评价,没有时间划分。共选择了19项研究。对这些信息进行了描述性评价,并将其与相关发现进行了比较。结果:样本研究以英文发表,包括三种类型的生物膜研究:两种临床,六种体外和11种体内(动物)。三个主题包括:生物膜模型创建(n=4),生物膜评估(n=3),干预前生物膜行为管理(n=12)。结论:生物膜对创面愈合的不利作用已得到证实。在体外和体内模型中,几种干预措施能够减少和消除生物膜。对实践的贡献:发现对病变的临床评估不允许识别生物膜,即使存在;它位于病变表面以下。这一发现引起了部分护士对采取干预措施去除生物膜的反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信