Assessment of Hyperacusis in Egyptian patients: Evaluation of the Arabic version of the Khalfa questionnaire

M. Shabana, M. Selim, Amr El Refaie, Tarek El Dessouky, R. Soliman
{"title":"Assessment of Hyperacusis in Egyptian patients: Evaluation of the Arabic version of the Khalfa questionnaire","authors":"M. Shabana, M. Selim, Amr El Refaie, Tarek El Dessouky, R. Soliman","doi":"10.3109/1651386X.2011.624684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: Hyperacusis appears to be a subjective phenomenon, which is not easily defined or quantified by objective measurements. The primary aim of this work was to evaluate the Arabic version of the Khalfa questionnaire for hyperacusis on a sample of normal hearing Egyptians complaining of hyperacusis. The secondary aim was to compare the audiological criteria of this group of hyperacusis patients (with or without tinnitus) with a control group of similar age and gender. Study design: The study group comprised 60 adult patients (age range 19–45 years) having normal hearing and complaining of hyperacusis with or without tinnitus. The control group comprised 20 normal hearing age and gender-matched individuals. All patients were subjected to full history-taking, otological examination, pure tone audiometry, immittance audiometry, uncomfortable loudness levels (ULLs) assessment, a transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) test and, in addition, to the Arabic version of the Khalfa hyperacusis questionnaire. Results: The uncomfortable loudness levels indicated a markedly contracted dynamic range in the hyperacusis group, with the majority of individuals showing ULLs less than 90dB HL. Hyperacusis patients with tinnitus showed significantly lower TEOAEs amplitudes, with overall echo level and reproducibility percent lower than for hyperacusis patients without tinnitus or for the control group. Hyperacusis patients had higher means of total, attentional, social, and emotional scores on the Khalfa questionnaire compared to the control group. The emotional parameter of the questionnaire had the highest score for the hyperacusis patients. Both the emotional and attentional dimension scores were higher in females, while attentional scores were higher for males. The total and social dimensions were affected by age. Conclusions: The emotional impact of noise exposure was more severe than the attentional and social impact in hyperacusis patients. There was a gender difference evident in the results of the Khalfa questionnaire in hyperacusis patients. The Arabic version of the Khalfa hyperacusis questionnaire seems to be a fairly effective tool for the assessment of hyperacusis patients.","PeriodicalId":88223,"journal":{"name":"Audiological medicine","volume":"144 1","pages":"127 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiological medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/1651386X.2011.624684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: Hyperacusis appears to be a subjective phenomenon, which is not easily defined or quantified by objective measurements. The primary aim of this work was to evaluate the Arabic version of the Khalfa questionnaire for hyperacusis on a sample of normal hearing Egyptians complaining of hyperacusis. The secondary aim was to compare the audiological criteria of this group of hyperacusis patients (with or without tinnitus) with a control group of similar age and gender. Study design: The study group comprised 60 adult patients (age range 19–45 years) having normal hearing and complaining of hyperacusis with or without tinnitus. The control group comprised 20 normal hearing age and gender-matched individuals. All patients were subjected to full history-taking, otological examination, pure tone audiometry, immittance audiometry, uncomfortable loudness levels (ULLs) assessment, a transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) test and, in addition, to the Arabic version of the Khalfa hyperacusis questionnaire. Results: The uncomfortable loudness levels indicated a markedly contracted dynamic range in the hyperacusis group, with the majority of individuals showing ULLs less than 90dB HL. Hyperacusis patients with tinnitus showed significantly lower TEOAEs amplitudes, with overall echo level and reproducibility percent lower than for hyperacusis patients without tinnitus or for the control group. Hyperacusis patients had higher means of total, attentional, social, and emotional scores on the Khalfa questionnaire compared to the control group. The emotional parameter of the questionnaire had the highest score for the hyperacusis patients. Both the emotional and attentional dimension scores were higher in females, while attentional scores were higher for males. The total and social dimensions were affected by age. Conclusions: The emotional impact of noise exposure was more severe than the attentional and social impact in hyperacusis patients. There was a gender difference evident in the results of the Khalfa questionnaire in hyperacusis patients. The Arabic version of the Khalfa hyperacusis questionnaire seems to be a fairly effective tool for the assessment of hyperacusis patients.
埃及患者听觉亢进的评估:Khalfa问卷阿拉伯语版的评估
摘要目的:听觉亢进似乎是一种主观现象,不容易通过客观测量来定义或量化。这项工作的主要目的是评估阿拉伯语版本的哈利法调查问卷的听力正常的埃及人抱怨听力亢进的样本。第二个目的是比较这组耳鸣患者(伴有或不伴有耳鸣)与年龄和性别相似的对照组的听力学标准。研究设计:研究组包括60名成年患者(年龄范围19-45岁),听力正常,主诉听觉亢进伴或不伴耳鸣。对照组由20名听力正常且性别匹配的个体组成。所有患者都接受了完整的病史记录、耳科检查、纯音听力学、听力听力学、不舒服响度水平(ULLs)评估、瞬态诱发耳声发射(teoae)测试,此外,还接受了阿拉伯语版本的Khalfa超听问卷。结果:不舒服的响度水平表明,超听组的动态范围明显缩小,大多数个体的ull小于90dB HL。伴有耳鸣的耳聋患者teoae振幅明显低于无耳鸣的耳聋患者或对照组,其总体回声水平和再现率均低于对照组。与对照组相比,听力亢进患者在Khalfa问卷上的总分、注意力、社交和情绪得分较高。听力亢进患者的情绪参数得分最高。女性的情感和注意维度得分较高,而男性的注意维度得分较高。总体和社会维度受年龄的影响。结论:噪声暴露对耳聋患者的情绪影响大于注意和社会影响。在听觉亢进患者的Khalfa问卷调查结果有明显的性别差异。阿拉伯语版本的Khalfa听力亢进问卷似乎是一个相当有效的工具,为听力亢进患者的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信