Addressing the Sticky Issue of How to Consolidate Rehabilitation Counseling Professional Associations

T. Landon, B. Phillips, R. F. Kesselmayer, J. Bezyak, Paige N. Dunlap
{"title":"Addressing the Sticky Issue of How to Consolidate Rehabilitation Counseling Professional Associations","authors":"T. Landon, B. Phillips, R. F. Kesselmayer, J. Bezyak, Paige N. Dunlap","doi":"10.52017/001c.37910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the idea of consolidation has seemed to enjoy relative unanimity, the questions of who and how to consolidate have always proved a greater challenge. In this article, we describe rehabilitation counseling professionals’ thoughts about these more challenging questions. More specifically, we sought greater understanding about whether private rehabilitation counseling providers and educators would like to see their specializations represented in a consolidated association. We also sought participant perspectives about how to consolidate through a combination of quantitative and qualitative inquiry. Results suggest that most participants desired to see a more inclusive consolidated association. Opinions were more mixed on how to consolidate the existing associations, with the greatest frequency of participants being undecided. Implications and recommendations grounded in the business and professionalization literature offer insights into how the discipline can proactively move forward in an effort to sustain our preeminence among human service providers in the provision of counseling and vocational services to people with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":92715,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation counselors and educators journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation counselors and educators journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52017/001c.37910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although the idea of consolidation has seemed to enjoy relative unanimity, the questions of who and how to consolidate have always proved a greater challenge. In this article, we describe rehabilitation counseling professionals’ thoughts about these more challenging questions. More specifically, we sought greater understanding about whether private rehabilitation counseling providers and educators would like to see their specializations represented in a consolidated association. We also sought participant perspectives about how to consolidate through a combination of quantitative and qualitative inquiry. Results suggest that most participants desired to see a more inclusive consolidated association. Opinions were more mixed on how to consolidate the existing associations, with the greatest frequency of participants being undecided. Implications and recommendations grounded in the business and professionalization literature offer insights into how the discipline can proactively move forward in an effort to sustain our preeminence among human service providers in the provision of counseling and vocational services to people with disabilities.
解决如何巩固康复咨询专业协会这一棘手问题
虽然合并的想法似乎获得了相对一致的意见,但谁和如何合并的问题始终是一个更大的挑战。在这篇文章中,我们描述了康复咨询专业人员对这些更具挑战性的问题的看法。更具体地说,我们试图更好地了解私人康复咨询提供者和教育工作者是否希望看到他们的专业在一个合并的协会中得到代表。我们还寻求参与者关于如何通过定量和定性调查的结合来巩固的观点。结果表明,大多数参与者希望看到一个更具包容性的合并协会。在如何巩固现有协会的问题上,意见更为复杂,最多的参与者没有决定。基于商业和专业化文献的启示和建议提供了关于该学科如何积极向前发展的见解,以努力保持我们在为残疾人提供咨询和职业服务的人类服务提供者中的卓越地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信