Prompting second language writers for productive reflection using narrative questioning prompt

Nugrahenny T. Zacharias
{"title":"Prompting second language writers for productive reflection using narrative questioning prompt","authors":"Nugrahenny T. Zacharias","doi":"10.25170/IJELT.V14I2.1465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to introduce a novel form of reflective tool ‘narrative questioning’ to facilitate students’ elaborate and graded reflection in two ESL composition classes in a university in the US. Little has been written about a reflective tool where students need to produce a graded and elaborate reflection and this paper will seek to narrow that gap. Narrative questioning is developed primarily from Barkhuizen and Wette’s (2008) narrative frames. Narrative frames employ “a series of incomplete sentences and blank spaces of varying lengths” (Barkhuizen, 2014, p. 13). Narrative questioning utilizes a series of questions through which students reflected on their perceived learning gain throughout the semester. This paper will first discuss research in narrative reflective tools. Then, it will describe the classroom pedagogical lesson that I conducted to introduce and guide students to write their reflection using narrative questioning. Thirdly, the data gathered through students' reflection and individual interviews of 10 students will be presented and discussed. The data illustrates the different ways of narrative questioning facilitate reflection. Limitations of the narrative questioning elicited from students' interviews will also be presented here along with the pedagogical implication of the study.","PeriodicalId":34238,"journal":{"name":"IJET Indonesian Journal of English Teaching","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJET Indonesian Journal of English Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/IJELT.V14I2.1465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper aims to introduce a novel form of reflective tool ‘narrative questioning’ to facilitate students’ elaborate and graded reflection in two ESL composition classes in a university in the US. Little has been written about a reflective tool where students need to produce a graded and elaborate reflection and this paper will seek to narrow that gap. Narrative questioning is developed primarily from Barkhuizen and Wette’s (2008) narrative frames. Narrative frames employ “a series of incomplete sentences and blank spaces of varying lengths” (Barkhuizen, 2014, p. 13). Narrative questioning utilizes a series of questions through which students reflected on their perceived learning gain throughout the semester. This paper will first discuss research in narrative reflective tools. Then, it will describe the classroom pedagogical lesson that I conducted to introduce and guide students to write their reflection using narrative questioning. Thirdly, the data gathered through students' reflection and individual interviews of 10 students will be presented and discussed. The data illustrates the different ways of narrative questioning facilitate reflection. Limitations of the narrative questioning elicited from students' interviews will also be presented here along with the pedagogical implication of the study.
使用叙述性提问提示提示第二语言作者进行富有成效的反思
本文旨在介绍一种新型的反思工具“叙事提问”,以促进学生在美国一所大学的两个ESL作文课上的详细和分级反思。很少有关于反思工具的写作,学生需要进行分级和详细的反思,本文将试图缩小这一差距。叙事质疑主要是从Barkhuizen和Wette(2008)的叙事框架发展而来的。叙事框架采用“一系列不完整的句子和不同长度的空白”(Barkhuizen, 2014, p. 13)。叙事性提问采用一系列的问题,学生通过这些问题反映他们整个学期的学习收获。本文将首先讨论叙事反思工具的研究。然后,它将描述我所进行的课堂教学课,以介绍和引导学生用叙事性提问来写他们的反思。第三,通过学生反思和对10名学生的个人访谈收集到的数据进行展示和讨论。数据说明了不同的叙事提问方式有助于反思。从学生访谈中引出的叙事问题的局限性也将在这里与研究的教学意义一起提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信