Публичное и частное в налоговом праве России с учетом вызовов цифровой экономики

Olga Lutova
{"title":"Публичное и частное в налоговом праве России с учетом вызовов цифровой экономики","authors":"Olga Lutova","doi":"10.15290/acr.2018.11.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a changing world, which falls under the influence of two inextricably linked processes in the form of digitization and globalization, the issue of determining the position of the legislator in relation to the choice of the model of legal regulation becomes most relevant. At the same time, despite the active development of digitization processes of both the Russian and world economy, there is no single normative and/or doctrinal concept of cryptocurrency, both in economic science and in jurisprudence. We believe that this problem is of particular relevance in connection with the need to determine the state-power strategy of a public entity with regard to the development of Russian financial and tax legislation, considering current features of the financial system development in the digital age. In this regard, we consider the assessment of the “cryptocurrency” phenomenon taking into account the specifics of the Russian tax-legal regulation as one of the categories of taxation law, which is related to such fundamental notions as “object taxation” and “tax base”. Also, the development of the current concept of cryptocurrency significantly affects the most important notions of tax law-fiscal sovereignty, tax residency, legal personality, taxpayers and others. In addition, digitization requires, in the Author’s opinion, a revision of theoretical approaches to the system and structure tax law sources.","PeriodicalId":7334,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Computing Research","volume":"239 1","pages":"29-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Computing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/acr.2018.11.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a changing world, which falls under the influence of two inextricably linked processes in the form of digitization and globalization, the issue of determining the position of the legislator in relation to the choice of the model of legal regulation becomes most relevant. At the same time, despite the active development of digitization processes of both the Russian and world economy, there is no single normative and/or doctrinal concept of cryptocurrency, both in economic science and in jurisprudence. We believe that this problem is of particular relevance in connection with the need to determine the state-power strategy of a public entity with regard to the development of Russian financial and tax legislation, considering current features of the financial system development in the digital age. In this regard, we consider the assessment of the “cryptocurrency” phenomenon taking into account the specifics of the Russian tax-legal regulation as one of the categories of taxation law, which is related to such fundamental notions as “object taxation” and “tax base”. Also, the development of the current concept of cryptocurrency significantly affects the most important notions of tax law-fiscal sovereignty, tax residency, legal personality, taxpayers and others. In addition, digitization requires, in the Author’s opinion, a revision of theoretical approaches to the system and structure tax law sources.
考虑到数字经济的挑战,俄罗斯税法中的公共和私人
在数字化和全球化这两个不可分割的进程影响下不断变化的世界中,确定立法者在选择法律规制模式方面的立场问题变得最为重要。与此同时,尽管俄罗斯和世界经济的数字化进程都在积极发展,但无论是在经济科学还是在法理学中,都没有单一的加密货币规范和/或理论概念。我们认为,考虑到数字时代金融体系发展的当前特征,这一问题与确定公共实体在俄罗斯金融和税收立法发展方面的国家权力战略的必要性特别相关。在这方面,我们考虑对“加密货币”现象的评估,同时考虑到俄罗斯税收法律法规作为税法类别之一的具体情况,这与“客体税收”和“税基”等基本概念有关。此外,当前加密货币概念的发展显著影响了税法中最重要的概念——财政主权、税收居住权、法人人格、纳税人等。此外,笔者认为,数字化还需要对税收法律来源的制度和结构的理论思路进行修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信